You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
White House responds to N. Korea policy critics
2006-10-24
The White House fired back Monday at critics of its North Korean policy, saying direct talks with the North, which many are urging, would weaken efforts to confront the reclusive country's nuclear ambitions. J.D. Crouch, the White House's deputy national security adviser, also rejected claims that the North's explosion of a nuclear device on Oct. 9 represented a foreign policy failure for the administration President George W. Bush.

The United States and its allies, he said, are not responsible "for the decisions that are made in Pyongyang. They are. How we will be measured is by how we react to that, how we hold together, or whether we are seen as breaking apart as a result of this." Crouch said allowing separate talks between the United States and North Korea would eliminate crucial input from the other members of the so-called "six-party talks" - South Korea, Japan, China and Russia.

The North's nuclear program, Crouch told a gathering at the Center for Strategic and International Studies think tank, threatens "not just the United States but also the entire world. Other nations with influence in the region should be at the negotiating table."
Posted by:Fred

#11  I'm impressed the White House is finally publicly defending its policies and defusing some of the criticism. President Bush cannot be blamed for a foreign policy failure if the rest of the world, including China, oppose Kim's ambitions to unilaterally hold the world hostage to nuclear blackmail.
Posted by: Danielle   2006-10-24 10:33  

#10  I think Joe sends the local keyboard retailer's kids to college.
Posted by: mrp   2006-10-24 10:22  

#9  If I understand Joe's (rather impressive) analysis correctly, the Chinese are engaged in Gorbachev-like capitalism under communism, but need the Norks to act as their proxy in order to keep their hand in the Asian hegemony game. The Norks stay alive this way, but the Koreans as a whole are starting to suspect that the Chinese are marking them for absorption at some later point. (Joe, how'd I do?)

I used to be confused by Joe but his writing is getting more and more incisive, particularly with respect to the Chinese. If only he'd leave off the weird capitalizations...
Posted by: Jonathan   2006-10-24 10:10  

#8  We could ask CF for a translation... A CliffsNotes version would be best.
Posted by: .com   2006-10-24 09:19  

#7  it hurts my head...like the stripes in Ann Sheridan's pants
Posted by: Frank G   2006-10-24 09:18  

#6  I'll mine it for Caps and Punctuation.
Posted by: .com   2006-10-24 09:15  

#5  Yeah, Mr. Mendiola was unusually clear, and he made some good points... or perhaps we're just becoming used to it, I dunno.
Posted by: anonymous5089   2006-10-24 09:06  

#4  Good Analysis Joe...

...once I parsed it that is :).
Posted by: CrazyFool   2006-10-24 08:27  

#3  Kimmie can negotiate with the Japanese General Staff.
Posted by: ed   2006-10-24 01:03  

#2  Sorry, but I doubt the Chicoms = Commies won't agree to it becuz one, the decades-old, geo-potemkinist ideo facade that Communists + Leftists are NOT imperialists; second, the facade of the NorComs that they fought against any and all forms of European andor External rule and influnce, i.e. KOREA FOR KOREANS ONLY; and third, by all accounts China has not forsaken its ambitions for Chinese- + Commie-centric Asia-Pacific hegemony. China needs the NORKORS to PC threaten other Asian nations + West so that China can have PDeniability, i.e. "save face". China is still weak or vulnerable in comparison to several of its regional competitors espec JAPAN + including SCO. China, like Mikhail Gorbachev, wants MODERNIZATION BUT UNDER COMMUNISM-SOCIALISM, and hence needs to work in the shadows, i.e. subtlely or covertly for the most part. This is why China will do little or nuthin to stop Kimmie unless Chinese control of North Korea is being directly = overtly threatened + Kimmie or successor directs Norkie fury at any other regional-world state except China. North Korea is viewed by many credentialed pundits-analysts as already being a nuclear power long before the recent nuke tests, JUST THAT IT DOES NOT CONTROL ITS NUCLEAR WEAPONS NOR ITS OWN ARMY - CHINA DOES. IN HYPER-CORRECT, DIALECTIC CHICOM/COMMIE SPEAK, NORTH KOREA = KOREAS IS OFFICIALLY [ before the World] SOVEREIGN AND INDEPENDENT, BUT IN REALITY IS JUST A NON/UN-ANNEXED CHINESE PROVINCE(S). Even the latter is changing as both Koreas are complaining about Chinese books + maps which depicts the Koreas as geographically or ethnically part of mainland China. ITS GETTING HARDER AND HARDER FOR THE NOKORCOMS TO SAY OR PROVE THEY ARE NOT CHINESE = CHINESE-CONTROLLED! OOOOOOPPPPPPPPPPSSSIES, how does Kimmie Spears keep getting herself = himself = itself? into these thingys.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2006-10-24 00:49  

#1  How about 2-party talks? US and PRC. When you come right down to it, they are by far the biggest players in this opera.
Posted by: Jackal   2006-10-24 00:10  

00:00