You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
70 Taliban killed in Afghanistan raids
2006-10-29
NATO’s force in Afghanistan said around 70 people were killed in raids targeting the Taliban this week but was still unsure how many were civilians after reports that scores of ordinary people died. The International Security Assistance Force admitted in a statement late on Friday that a “number of civilians were killed along with a large number of insurgents” in the October 24 air strike in Kandahar province. “ISAF believes that around 70 individuals were killed,” the statement said. “We are satisfied that we identified and targeted a group of insurgents, but it is uncertain how many civilians were among the dead. In addition, it is unclear how many of the civilians were killed as a result of insurgent fire.”

Residents of the Panjwayi area have said between 60 and 85 civilians were killed in the late-night bombing raid, which started on the second day of Eid. Some have said none of the dead were Taliban, but ISAF has said it believed 48 were militants, including from a group that attacked a base.

On Friday it said 12 of the dead were civilians, while the police put the figure at about 25, with a presidential-appointed commission and a separate ISAF and Defence Ministry team investigating the incident.
Posted by:Fred

#9  If but civilian, you mean they weren't in military uniform, then yes: all the casualties were "civilian".

Al
Posted by: Frozen Al   2006-10-29 13:19  

#8  Oh no we might have killed moderate followers of the the pedophile for profit Muhamhead.

By the way can anyone please explain to me how you can be a "moderate" follower of a man who was a murderer, terrorist and a common thief?

Silence........
Posted by: Icerigger   2006-10-29 10:46  

#7  Ugh *infiltrators*
Posted by: Lancasters Over Dresden   2006-10-29 10:35  

#6  Wow! Way up from the usual death toll of 20 Taliban Pakistani inflitrators.
Posted by: Lancasters Over Dresden   2006-10-29 10:34  

#5  PakiWaki Daily Slimes.
Posted by: .com   2006-10-29 10:12  

#4  There are no civilians in an insurgency.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2006-10-29 09:17  

#3  I recall an incident during the Vietnam War, where anti-war members of Congress complained of bombing of farm dikes. Then Melvin Laird, Defense Minister, held up pictures of Ack-Acks positioned feet away from dikes. Shut up time.
Posted by: Snease Shaiting3550   2006-10-29 02:35  

#2  Yup. bunches of ordinary people died. Some had RPG's. Some were carrying AK's. Some IED's. Others just grenades and ammunition. Nothing out of the ordinary, though.
Posted by: anymouse   2006-10-29 00:51  

#1  Why are we getting into this collateral damage debate? Paleos claim that nearly 100% of those killed by the IAF/IDF are "civilians." The truth wouldn't play on Arab or Euro-Street.
Posted by: Snease Shaiting3550   2006-10-29 00:33  

00:00