You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Ruh Roh: Russia Rushes 'Ranians Rockets
2006-11-24
Russia sends air defense system to Iran
Russia has begun delivery of Tor-M1 air defense missile systems to Iran, a Defense Ministry official said Friday, confirming that Moscow would proceed with arms deals with Tehran in spite of Western criticism.
The Tsar needs no approval, no friends, no allies, no nuthin'. He is Tsar.
The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to discuss the issue, declined to specify when the deliveries had been made and how many systems had been delivered.
Egggzactly eleventy-seven.
Ministry officials have previously said Moscow would supply 29 of the sophisticated missile systems to Iran under a US$700 million (€565 million) contract signed in December, according to Russian media reports.
Anything for a buck. Seen these pix of my seester?
The United States called on all countries last spring to stop all arms exports to Iran, as well as ending all nuclear cooperation with it to put pressure on Tehran to halt uranium enrichment activities. Israel, too, has severely criticized arms deals with Iran.
Bad Mullahs. Bad.
Tehran insists its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes, but the United States and its allies suspect Iran is trying to develop weapons.
The Little Engine That 'Sploded. Really good.
The UN Security Council, where Russia is a veto-wielding permanent member, is currently stalemated on the severity of sanctions on Iran for defying its demand to cease uranium enrichment.
Neener, neener!
The Tor-M1 deal, involving conventional weapons, does not violate any international agreements.
Just common sense.
Russian officials say that the missiles are purely defensive weapons with a limited range.
Yah, so?
According to the Interfax news agency, the Tor-M1 system can identify up to 48 targets and fire at two targets simultaneously at a height of up to 6,000 meters (20,000 feet).
We know.
Russian media have reported previously that Moscow had conducted talks on selling even more powerful long-range S-300 air defense missiles, but Russian officials have denied that.
Who, us? Why would you think that? Now whaddabout my seester?
AFP version here.
Posted by:.com

#9  Something needs to be flown up RasPutin's shorts damn soon.
Posted by: Zenster   2006-11-24 22:14  

#8  Various Mil Forum'ers believe that Iran is intent on setting up circa INTEGRATED, TIGHTLY CONTROLLED FIVE KILLING ZONES around Iran in case of a US invasion, as defended by well-equipped IRGC + asymmetric warfare guerilla = insurgent units. Iran is intent on acquiring S-300/400's, KILOS, ADVANS FLANKERS, + UPGRADED FENCER FIGHTER-BOMBERS, Missle-/Air Defense Radars. NOT JUST FROM RUSSIA, BUT ALSO FROM CHINA + EUROS [read, FRANCE]. RUSSIA > IRAN WILL HAVE NUKE BOMBS IN TWO YEARS [2008? Calling POTUS/CO-POTUS VEEP HILLARY]. Nuke bombs = meant as a last-resort, "take 'em all with us to hell" act agz ISRAEL = US Euro-Allies.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2006-11-24 21:13  

#7  Actually, I'm thinking that now we know why they say Iran's nuclear program is for peaceful purposes . . . .
Posted by: gorb   2006-11-24 19:21  

#6  So why bother owning them if they do nothing? Protection against another locust invasion or something?

Think Medicine Shirt
Posted by: Shipman   2006-11-24 18:36  

#5  Russian officials say that the missiles are purely defensive weapons with a limited range.

So why bother owning them if they do nothing? Protection against another locust invasion or something?

Russian media have reported previously that Moscow had conducted talks on selling even more powerful long-range S-300 air defense missiles, but Russian officials have denied that.

Well, any excuses that they came up with were so wretchedly flimsy all they had left was denial, I suppose.
Posted by: gorb   2006-11-24 16:46  

#4  What good is a missile with that range when we have GPS-guided iron bombs with greater range?
Posted by: Rob Crawford   2006-11-24 15:06  

#3  at: http://defense-update.com/products/t/tor.htm

is a description of the Tor-M1

It is advertised to be able to hit cruise missiles and other smaller targets with a high degree of accuracy.

I'm willing to believe the Tor-M1 could take out helicopters or most jets that got within 4 miles of the site but its hard to believe it could take out our best (or even 2nd best) air to surface missiles.

Anyone familiar with the Tor-M1?
Posted by: mhw   2006-11-24 14:05  

#2  Anybody who doesn't understand the effects of the Islamic meme on its victims.
Posted by: gromgoru   2006-11-24 11:39  

#1  Who gets the feeling China/Russia are the brains behind the terrorist states of Iran, North of Korea and Syria???!!
Posted by: Ebbolump Glomotle9608   2006-11-24 11:33  

00:00