Submit your comments on this article | ||||
China-Japan-Koreas | ||||
Japan Says It Could Build a Nuclear Bomb | ||||
2006-12-01 | ||||
![]()
Prime Minister Shinzo Abe has asserted several times since the test that Japan would not stray from its non-nuclear policy, and he has refused to initiate a formal review of that stance. Several high-ranking government and ruling party members, however, including Aso, have argued for a high-level reappraisal of the nuclear policy in light of the North Korean threat.
"Possession of minimum level of arms for defense is not prohibited under the Article 9 of the Constitution," Aso said. "Even nuclear weapons, if there are any that fall within that limit, they are not prohibited."
| ||||
Posted by:Steve White |
#13 Japan has 45 000 kg of plutonium in stockpile. You only need 2-3 kg with a sophisticated design. While most of that is called reactor grade, (a) a sophisticated design can use reactor grade stuff and still have a reliable yield (b) a reactor core discharge produces a significant fraction that is actually weapons grade Pu, though not normally considered as such. The solid boosters they developed for their H1 space vehicle would have a tremendous throw weight. China, with its stocks of just 4000 kg of Pu, with its less accurate rocket tech has a lot to worry about... especially with Japan joining the US for the ABM program |
Posted by: john 2006-12-01 15:47 |
#12 Given that Japan also has some of the most powerful supercomputers in the entire world, I would say that it's safe to assume all of the critical subassemblies have gone through detailed dynamic performance verification modeling. |
Posted by: Zenster 2006-12-01 14:33 |
#11 I'd bet money that all the non-nuclear parts are manufactured, perhaps as many as 50 copies each, and some sub-assembly has taken place. All that would be needed would be the plutonium/u235 cores, depending on the type of bomb. I'd even be willing to bet the plutonium is "available". Thirty days maximum from the time a decision is made until the final product is ready for use. I'm sure China knows this, and I wouldn't be surprised if NKor knows this. I WOULD be surprised if either knew exactly WHERE that manufacturing and assembly would take place. |
Posted by: Old Patriot 2006-12-01 13:33 |
#10 And this time there would be an earth shattering kaboom |
Posted by: kelly 2006-12-01 10:53 |
#9 My guess is that most of the components are sitting on a shelf someplace. More likely designs are in a CAD program locked in a safe just waiting to be loaded into the manufacturing robots. Longest time would be to make the plutonium cores, I'd say 6 months. |
Posted by: Steve 2006-12-01 09:49 |
#8 Bet they could build the Toyota of bombs: small, efficient, reliable, always works. They could make some spares maybe for Canada. If they are sold as Toyota's we could make a good case for them. |
Posted by: Excalibur 2006-12-01 09:15 |
#7 Maybe even less than two weeks. My guess is that most of the components are sitting on a shelf someplace. |
Posted by: Chuck Simmins 2006-12-01 08:46 |
#6 They've also got a very nice solid-fuel space booster that's essentially a back-engineered Peacekeeper. Just the thing you'd put a nuke on if you had one, which Japan of course doesn't . . . yet. |
Posted by: Mike 2006-12-01 07:17 |
#5 The nearly silent hiss of a Samurai blade sliding from its scabbard. |
Posted by: Zenster 2006-12-01 02:53 |
#4 The Red Emperor strokes his lap dog and considers his response. |
Posted by: Slaviger Angomong7708 2006-12-01 01:59 |
#3 Heh heh heh. China, NorK, your responses, please? |
Posted by: gorb 2006-12-01 00:56 |
#2 "but has no immediate plans to do so, the foreign minister said Thursday" However, if the need arose, could probably have one ready for test in two weeks. Testing will be conducted over North Korea. |
Posted by: SpecOp35 2006-12-01 00:32 |
#1 Japan - next to India, the least-discussed, most important, positive strategic shift since 9/11 (from a different starting point, for different reasons). Aside from an AWOL political class and current Iraq hysteria, the larger picture has been positive for a long time. |
Posted by: Verlaine 2006-12-01 00:30 |