You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia
$20bn gas project seized by Russia
2006-12-12
Shell is being forced by the Russian government to hand over its controlling stake in the world's biggest liquefied gas project, provoking fresh fears about the Kremlin's willingness to use the country's growing strength in natural resources as a political weapon. After months of relentless pressure from Moscow, the Anglo-Dutch company has to cut its stake in the $20bn Sakhalin-2 scheme in the far east of Russia in favour of the state-owned energy group Gazprom.

The Russian authorities are also threatening BP over alleged environmental violations on a Siberian field in what is seen as a wider attempt to seize back assets handed over to foreign companies when energy prices were low.
It's not like they have the rule of law to restrain them.
The moves will alarm many investors in the City of London as Shell and other share prices are hit, but the news will also increase ministers' concerns about Britain's energy security.
Not to mention making it clear that you can't do business in Russia. In that way they're no better than any other thugocracy. You know, like Saddam.
Russia is becoming a key source of natural gas to the UK and Gazprom has already made clear it would like to buy a company such as Centrica, which owns British Gas. One third of western Europe's natural gas is supplied by Russia - a figure expected to rise over the next decade.
Boy howdy, the new Muslim rulers of Eurabia are sure going to have a problem figuring that one out.
The security of energy supply is now the main political issue between the EU and the Kremlin. Nervousness about the Russians was heightened last winter when the gas supply to Ukraine was cut off in the middle of a political dispute.
"Everyone in class paying attention? You there in the back, Nigel, see what we did to Mikhail here?"
Shell confirmed last night that its chief executive, Jeroen van der Veer, met Gazprom's chairman, Alexei Miller, in Moscow last Friday but would say only that the talks on Sakhalin-2 were "constructive". The Russian company said that "Shell did indeed make several proposals concerning Sakhalin-2" at the meeting which came after Shell was threatened with having its operating licence withdrawn.
I'll bet they became real constructive.
The energy minister, Viktor Khristenko, is expected to give details today of a deal under which Shell and its Japanese partners are likely to get a small cash payment in return for giving Gazprom a big stake in the project.

Dmitry Peskov, the official spokesman of Russia's president, Vladimir Putin, hit out yesterday at critics in the western media who implicated the Russian government in manipulating oil projects and the poisoning of dissidents. He said there was too much "anti-Russian hysteria". With reference to BP's oil spills in Alaska, he added: "If it's an environmental problem in Alaska it's environmental. If it's in Russia you call it politics."
Well yeah, 'cause there hasn't been a big oil spill in Russia.
But other senior politicians in Moscow had no doubt Shell was being harassed into reducing its 55% stake in Sakhalin-2 to something close to 25% through relentless pressure from ministries. "In the current situation Shell will not be able to defend its economic interests in a civilised process with the Russian authorities, ...
... since a civilized process doesn't exist ...
... so they will be obliged to give up control if they want to save at least some adequate part of the project," said Vladimir Milov, Russia's former deputy energy minister.

Bob Amsterdam, the lawyer of the jailed oil oligarch Mikhail Khodorkovsky, said the Kremlin was "once again" using legal pretexts to cover what was essentially an expropriation of private resources in the energy sector. "The Kremlin ought to cease this behaviour," he said.
That'll tell 'em.
The Sakhalin-2 project is scheduled to start operations in 2008 and involves finding and producing oil and gas near Sakhalin island, formerly known only as a penal colony during the tsarist and Soviet eras. The two fields that make up Sakhalin-2 have an estimated 1.2bn barrels of oil and 500bn cubic metres of natural gas. The gas is to be brought ashore, liquefied and frozen before being shipped to customers in Japan and elsewhere.

The scheme created almost immediate controversy with western conservation groups because it involves putting equipment close to breeding grounds of endangered western grey whales. There has also been criticism that sensitive salmon fishing areas are being hit by dumping of dredging spoil waste amid worries about oil spills from platforms in the Okhotsk and Japanese seas.

But even non-governmental organisations have expressed surprise at the way the Russian authorities have taken up environmental issues since the summer after taking little interest before. Mr Peskov said it was a coincidence of timing and that it was "a process that is natural for every country" to come to eventually. Mr Putin's spokesman said Russia wanted to encourage western investment and wanted closer links with west European countries to foster mutual "interdependence".
"We love our baby seals! We used a dozen of 'em on Mrs. Putin's coat, and lemme tell ya she thought they were great!"
Posted by:Steve White

#17  In the wake of the Chinese leasing a chunk of Siberia, the US should start buying it- start at the Bering Strait and work its way West. It would be money well spent and keep two enemies a bit further back. The political and population vacuum in Siberia will not last forever.
Posted by: Grunter   2006-12-12 23:18  

#16  Shell should get ALL of their people out of Russia.

And the last one to leave should set the gas field on fire just before his helicopter lifts off.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2006-12-12 15:40  

#15  But it is the water wars that will be really nasty.

If the North Pole icecap really does melt, watch the wells and reservoirs fill up from the increased rains.
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-12-12 15:07  

#14  Everything is proceeding to plan. All the 60's Leftists that were enraged and horrified at the collapse of the Soviet Union are diligently working towards our defeat.

Given that our politicians can't find the spine to resist the Islamists, should one expect them to fight the resurgent Russian Commies? It's a toss up as to whom the Lefties will deliver us to first.

CW-II, getting closer.

Posted by: Mick Dundee   2006-12-12 12:42  

#13  The Mexican government seized and then incorporated into the ruling family alliances nationalized the ‘foreignÂ’ oil assets in the 30s. We see today where that has led to. I guess the Chinese had better get working on refurbishing that Great Wall now in anticipation of the wave of illegals to be headed their way in another 30+ years. At least they have a wall in place.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2006-12-12 09:07  

#12  Look for other oil countries to 'renegotiate' contracts with the big oil companies. There's profit in those company coffers just waiting to be harvested. In the past the result has been cessation of investment of industry capital and expertise, but 1) they (oil governments) don't look that far ahead (goose - golden egg), and 2) now there's China just waiting (instigating?) to offer ITS capital and expertise. And the Chavezes of the world won't recognize the chains attached to the deals - tougher by far than any chains attached by Shell or even the US government.
Posted by: Glenmore   2006-12-12 08:35  

#11  But it is the water wars that will be really nasty.
Posted by: bombay   2006-12-12 08:25  

#10  With a growing world population, energy wars can't be far off.
Posted by: Icerigger   2006-12-12 07:05  

#9  It's Chinese government policy to regain all the territories lost under 'unfair' 19th century treaties. This includes most of Khabarovsk Krai and Sakhalin Island lost to Russia in the 1850/60s (although Chinese control of Sahkalin was never more than token).

Incidentally the background to my next novel, if I ever get around to finishing it.
Posted by: phil_b   2006-12-12 02:28  

#8  interesting times....stay tuned...

»:-)

Posted by: RD   2006-12-12 02:19  

#7  ASIA TIMES says it more succintly - Russia is using its post-Berlin Wall/1991/USSR newfound econ wealth and redirecting POL flows from the world unto itself + Asia [Asia = read, Russia]. Meanwhile, JAMESTOWN.ORG > BEIJING'S NEW GRAND STRATEGY > China ,for now, seeks to PC stay a THIRD-WORLD, "STATUS QUO" STATE-POWER while quietly or subtlely STRENGTHENING ITS GLOBAL = GEOPOL POSITION vv USA , by use of "extra-military instruments". IOW, like Dubya in IRAQ, will "stay the course" while simul BUILDING-CONTRUCTING ITS FUTURE DESTINY. JAMESTOWN - National Modernization is viewed by China as [temporarily?]more important than the Re-Unification Issue wid TAIWAN.

*NOTE wid JAMESTOWN.org article > USA ONLY, NOT AGZ RUSSIA.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2006-12-12 02:09  

#6  American jobs?
Posted by: .com   2006-12-12 01:38  

#5  This is what happens when you snuggle up with the Bear.( Bear gets hungry and swallows ya) Same is happening in China. All these turncoat bastards who moved all American jobs there are getting shafted. Motorola lost their ass and all their technical capital. Shit, same happened 30 years ago when Chrysler got f**cked over. These greedy numbnuts never learn. Have to get bashed right in the face again to get a friggin' clue.
Posted by: SpecOp35   2006-12-12 01:27  

#4  So whatcha gonna do Werld? And you, Nederlanders? Neener-neener. I am Tsar! I am invincible! I steal Super Bowl rings and companies and assets! Bwahahahaha! No bauble too small, no conglomerate too large! I have Po210! I can do anything!
Posted by: .com   2006-12-12 01:12  

#3  Doesn't matter.
All of eastern siberia will be part of either China or the New Manchu Peoples Republic within another 10 or 20 years...
Putie is playing a losing hand.
Posted by: 3dc   2006-12-12 00:55  

#2  The Empire is back.
Posted by: gromgoru   2006-12-12 00:53  

#1  Sakhalin island, formerly known only as a penal colony during the tsarist and Soviet eras.

Actually, Sakhalin was jointly ruled by Russia and Japan from the 1860s. Japan annexed the southern half of the island in 1905. Russia regained possesion by bravely invading 4 days before Japan surrendered in 1946
Posted by: phil_b   2006-12-12 00:33  

00:00