You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
International-UN-NGOs
Move to bring genocide case against Ahmadinejad as he repeats call to wipe out Israel
2006-12-14
Nice. My only contention is that he's not the true brain of the regime, IIUC, that would be rafsandjani and khameiny, he's the face of the MM, an angry, hateful midget's face, that is.
Robert Tait in Tehran, Ed Pilkington in New York
The outgoing US ambassador to the United Nations, John Bolton, is backing a call for the president of Iran to be charged with inciting genocide because of his speeches advocating the destruction of the state of Israel.
Great! Now, that's a classy exit!

Barely a week after he announced his resignation from the UN post, Mr Bolton will appear tomorrow among a panel of diplomats and lawyers calling for Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to be prosecuted. The panel has been convened by a Jewish umbrella group in the US, the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organisations.

Mr Bolton was forced to quit his post after his appointment was blocked by Democrats and several Republicans in the Senate foreign relations committee. President George Bush said he accepted the resignation but was unhappy about it.

The call for legal action came as Mr Ahmadinejad repeated his onslaught against Israel at an international gathering of holocaust deniers in Tehran. The president, who has dismissed the murder of six million Jews by the Nazis as a myth told up to 70 visiting speakers that the Israeli state would soon be wiped out.
Posted by:anonymous5089

#4  Not that he will be, but MOUD = MEMBER-STATE/STATE OF IRAN can technically already be referred to the UNSC for direct military action. Methinks Moud and legal advisors knows it which is why he does it. Russia is unlikely to repeat its famous mistake which led to UN action agzNorth Korea ala KOREAN WAR 1; and without Russia-China's approval, the present UNSC is unlikely to do or approve anything. Radical Iran can be attacked only what the MSM and anti-US agendists will proclaim is unilateral and indpendent US = US-led Allied action = interpreeted as proof of anti-UN, anti-UNSC, de facto singular US Internat aggression, bullying, and bellicosity, EVEN IFF DUBYA GETS MAJOR UNO STATES TO GO ALONG. MOUD LOSES NUTHIN BECUZ DUBYA-USA WILL GET BLAMED FOR EVERYTHING, INCLUD ANY NEW 9-11's AGZ USA IN "JUSTIFIED" RETALIATION, WHILE IRAN = RADICAL TERROR GETS ITS NUKES ANYWAYS. Does Dubya have the gumption to have the USA, etal. attack Iran despite knowing the Blame-game MSM outcome and despite knowing any such mil action will be spun around to justify new Terror agz America, including risk to his own life, GOP, + Washington NPE in general. As before and during the 2004 elex > CLINTONS-DEMS MANIA FOR POWER > PC "SAVING" AMERICA FROM MSM/LEFT-ALLEGED GOP-CAUSED/BLAMED NEW 9-11'S = TERROR = LIMITED [NUKE?] WAR = US-ONLY ARROGANCE + FASCISM + MALE BRUTE WARMONGER COWBOY IMPERIALISM, ETC = PC "SURVIVING" SAME. Hillary must be POTUS whether she lawfully wins, wins by Bill-style elex fraud, or survives a nuked Washington DC = destroyed NPE-NCA-USG or other WMD event, where most or all other Male Pols are either dead, too frightened, or too injured to govern.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2006-12-14 22:58  

#3  Bolton's commendable actions are merely the iceberg's tip. We need to begin taking all of these hate-spewing morons at their word and acting directly upon their meaning. It must be made clear that opening your mouth to blat out anti-American, anti-Semitic or terrorist claptrap carries a price tag. Preferrably, a .45 caliber one.
Posted by: Zenster   2006-12-14 15:04  

#2  ... Tony Blair condemned the conference as "shocking beyond belief" and singled out the decision to invite David Duke, a former leading Ku Klux Klan member, as proof of Iran's extremism.

So, we were lacking sufficient proof before? Now that they've invited a pathetic, has-been, wanna-be U.S. politician with virtually no political influence it puts them into a higher class of extremism? I guess having a head of state who's actively pursuing nukes and threatening to wipe another nation off the map wasn't quite extreme enough for some people.
Posted by: xbalanke   2006-12-14 13:09  

#1  God, I'm gonna miss Bolton.
Posted by: Perfesser   2006-12-14 08:26  

00:00