You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Submit your comments on this article
Home Front: Culture Wars
San Francisco: Urination and Defecation OK
2006-12-17
From ChronWatch - CW...
Boy, talk about a city being caught up in liberal paralysis. CW has staunchly maintained that it is impossible for liberals to govern effectively. Governing requires decision-making, and the libs just can't do that for fear of hurting the feelings of some minority group If you have been looking for proof, what more does it take than the current indecision on a law banning urinating and defecating in public in S.F. The Chron sweeps through this story as though it is a normal story on a somewhat routine matter. The article notes the utter confusion without shock, dismay, or the realization that the SF world is upside down:
EXTRA: asylum run by wastes of skin
"Nothing is simple in San Francisco, not even a law about urinating in public. Suburban Walnut Creek's City Council, on the other hand, unanimously voted last month to outlaw public urination and defecation, going after rowdy young bar-hoppers.

San Francisco, meanwhile, is a complicated city with a growing homeless population and powerful homeless advocates. Politicians are more inclined to weigh the social problems that lead to public urination -- poverty on the streets, drug addiction, mental illness -- than the consequences'"
(Link)
oh well, maybe al-Q will nuke it
Ladies and gentlemen, this is a major metropolitan newspaper explaining away the liberals inability to get anything done, even a matter as obvious as this.

CW has often wondered why the homeless are only paid $320-390 per month. All good liberals know that this not a "living wage" in S.F. And, they are clearly employees of the City. They don't work for anybody else, for sure. Therefore, why aren't they paid the minimum living wage required of all firms doing business with the City?

Once known for "beauty and excellence," SF is now the smelly, joke-scene for the rest of the world.
Posted by:RD

#10  

I like San Francisco, to POOP on!!
Posted by: DMFD   2006-12-17 16:41  

#9  priceless snark Frank! LOL!

Posted by: RD   2006-12-17 14:03  

#8  Actually, I'd like to deficate and urinate on San Fransisco too.

Al
Posted by: Frozen Al   2006-12-17 13:46  

#7  now let me get this straight, (pardon the pun)
if your dog poops in the street you need to pick it up or be fined. But if a person does the same.....
Posted by: Jan   2006-12-17 12:35  

#6  Hummmmmm... joooooos (in the PC guise of NazIsraeloppressorofinnocentpaleos or the "lobby which doesn't exist") and catholics? That's what I'd answer for France, not sure for SF.
Posted by: anonymous5089   2006-12-17 11:47  

#5  Whites bad, all minorities good

A true liberal knows there are, at least, two exceptions here.
Posted by: gromgoru   2006-12-17 09:43  

#4  It goes on and on. Liberals are defective people, we need to wirehead them and get on with business.

Let's not be hasty. There is always nerve-stapling to consider.
Posted by: Excalibur   2006-12-17 08:52  

#3  Natural selection is just so slow.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2006-12-17 07:51  

#2  I have concluded that Liberals brains are wired backwards. The see bad as good, and good as bad. Extrapolate that reversed mentality to just about everything and it explains why they behave the way they do.

Examples:
Losing good, winning bad.
Criminals are victims, crime victims are guilty.
Peaceful religion bad, violent pseudo-religion good.
Whites bad, all minorities good.

It goes on and on. Liberals are defective people, we need to wirehead them and get on with business.

Posted by: Mick Dundee   2006-12-17 07:09  

#1  Maybe they'll have a big cholera epidemic. Problem solved!
Posted by: PBMcL   2006-12-17 02:41  

00:00