You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Short Attention Span Theater-
Plane Carrying PM Blair Overshoots Miami Runway
2006-12-27
(CBS) MIAMI British Prime Minister Tony Blair was confirmed to be aboard the British Airways flight that overshot the runway at Miami International Airport Tuesday evening.

Flight 209, carrying 343 passengers and crew onboard luckily had no injuries. The plane did not sustain any damage, but some runway lights were broken by the plane. The plane was making an arrival from LondonÂ’s Heathrow Airport, with Blair traveling in first class.

No word yet on what caused it to slightly run off the landing area and onto the grass, said Laura Brown, a Federal Aviation Administration spokeswoman. The plane, with passengers inside, was towed to the terminal on its own power without incident.

A Downing Street official, speaking on condition of anonymity because he wasn't authorized to talk about Blair's travel plans, said the prime minister and his family were not hurt in the mishap. He did not say where the Blair family was going, but Blair and his family have taken vacation in Bermuda before.

The pilot stopped the plane at the end of the runway because he could not see the lights to the taxiway, British Airways spokesman John Lampl said. "Apparently they're doing some resurfacing work and relighting, so the lighting was poor. Just to err on the side of caution, the captain decided to stop at the end of the runway and called the tower," Lampl said.

The taxiway lighting met FAA standards, the agency's spokeswoman said.
Heh. Gotta be the Yanks' fault. Mr Lampl (lol), how many other flights overshot due to the "poor lighting", eh?
CBS sources would not comment further as to why Blair was traveling on the plane.
UK PM riding in FC on a commercial flight? Anyone else find this a bit surprising? I admit I presumed the security arrangements for the PM would be more, um, robust than this.
Posted by:.com

#10  Well, at least he's doin' his part to reduce greenhouse gases CO2, eh? I mean, Jimmuh wanted his OWN plane to Brandeis Univ. to speak about his new book, lol!

And, yes, I know CO2 is supposedly a greenhouse gas. Just tryin' to keep up with all the changing buzzwords in the enviro community.
Posted by: BA   2006-12-27 14:45  

#9  UK PM riding in FC on a commercial flight? Anyone else find this a bit surprising? I admit I presumed the security arrangements for the PM would be more, um, robust than this.

Maybe because there are other pressures? The Daily Mail's spin is:
"The Prime Minister's first-class tickets would have cost him more than £7,500 each. The flight bill for all his party would be almost £40,000 - but to pay for a week at a beachfront property similar to Gibb's would have cost about the same.

Shadow transport secretary Chris Grayling said: "Another year, another celebrity holiday. Next thing we know he'll be in Beverly Hills next to the Beckhams. Why can't he pay for his holidays in the normal way like the rest of us?"

When Mr Blair has stayed at holiday homes of other stars, he has insisted he makes a payment to charity."
Posted by: KBK   2006-12-27 13:24  

#8  As far as I can tell, the "runway" part of this is a complete non-story. They were taxiing around, missed the turn, came to the "official" (but still paved) end of the runway -- oopsie. And that was it. No drama, just an extra long time to the gate.

Blair travelling on a commercial aircraft -- now that's odd. On the other hand, people do vacation in Florida, you know. Does he fly commercial when he vacations at Sharm el-Sheikh? Probably figures he's somewhat less likely to blown up in Miami.
Posted by: Angie Schultz   2006-12-27 12:23  

#7  That's harsh Frank. And funny.
Posted by: Classical_Liberal   2006-12-27 12:22  

#6  not to fret about security - IIUC he wuz wearing a burqa
Posted by: Frank G   2006-12-27 10:35  

#5  Let's hope Iran. But I suspect "climate change" optics are just as likely. It would not do to take precautions with the leader of one of the free world's only great powers. I am only surprised they did not make a show of sitting him next to the four guys named Mohammed, Abdul, Mustafa and Muhammed.
Posted by: Excalibur   2006-12-27 10:28  

#4  Let's hope Iran. But I suspect "climate change" optics are just as likely. It would not do to take precautions with the leader of one of the free world's only great powers. I am only surprised they did not make a show of sitting him next to the four guys named Mohammed, Abdul, Mustafa and Muhammed.
Posted by: Excalibur   2006-12-27 10:26  

#3  UK PM riding in FC on a commerical flight? Anyone else find this a bit surprising? I admit I presumed the security arrangements for the PM would be more, um, robust than this.
Weird. Was he incognito? If so something's up, if not somethings really up.


Iraan
Posted by: RD   2006-12-27 08:09  

#2  Hey, Ship - how come you misspelled "commercial"?

Lol.
Posted by: .com   2006-12-27 08:04  

#1  UK PM riding in FC on a commerical flight? Anyone else find this a bit surprising? I admit I presumed the security arrangements for the PM would be more, um, robust than this.
Weird. Was he incognito? If so something's up, if not somethings really up.

Posted by: Shipman   2006-12-27 07:47  

00:00