You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Israel-Palestine-Jordan
Halutz quits
2007-01-17
In a surprise move two weeks after declaring that he would remain in the army Chief of General Staff Lt.- Gen. Dan Halutz submitted his resignation late Tuesday night to Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and Defense Minister Amir Peretz.
Going to spend more time with your family, Coach?
"Gosh. Sorry to see you go. Do you need help packing?"
The pile of cardboard boxes outside his office door should have told him something ...
In his letter to Olmert and Peretz, Halutz said that he felt a responsibility as the military's superior officer to remain in his position until the completion of the 50 internal probes into the performance of the military during the war, and until the IDF's workplan for 2007 was completed. Once this was done, Halutz asked to leave his job immediately.

Olmert expressed his "deep sorrow" over Halutz's decision. Olmert was aware of Halutz's intention before the official announcement was made and had asked the chief of staff to reconsider. Halutz, however, was deteremined, and the prime minister had no choice but to accept halutz's resignation.
Posted by:Fred

#5  I agree with grom.
Posted by: ex-lib   2007-01-17 15:32  

#4  Smart doesn't mean nada. Flyboys simply cannot grasp (on guts down level) how things work on ground level. Have no understanding of sustained combat. And Israeli, at least, don't understand logistics.
Posted by: gromgoru   2007-01-17 12:53  

#3  
Nothing personal---fly boys are perfectly OK in their place, but one shouldn't be RAMATKAL (head of joint staff).


It is perfectly Ok for an Air Force guy to be RATMAKAL... as long as he is smart. Smart enough to be undistracted by service loyalty and not try to solve a ground army problem with air for. Also, a chief of staff is less concerned with the planning of actual operations (remind it was NOT Colin Powell who designed the plan for Desert Stotm) but with defence policy, coordination between services, management of resources both between services (he must resist the temptation to strip other services and inflate his own) and between fronts so there is no reason at least in peace time that a Navy or Air Force man cannot become chief of staff. In war time I would tend to think that it is better to have a guy who know from teh inside, the neeeeeds, strenghts and weaknesses from the service who is most crucial for winning the war. 90% of time this is the ground army even if from time to time it isn't.
Posted by: JFM   2007-01-17 08:04  

#2  Nothing personal---fly boys are perfectly OK in their place, but one shouldn't be RAMATKAL (head of joint staff).
Posted by: gromgoru   2007-01-17 06:03  

#1  Damn. Guess there really are consequences to losing a war. Who knew?
Posted by: Elmotch Glomoling7166   2007-01-17 00:40  

00:00