You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Britain
Police photos show UK accused at camp
2007-01-19
THE men had chosen one of the highest fields on Baysbrown Farm, enclosed by stone walls and below the lakeland crags, as their campsite. They pitched their tents several hundred metres from the main campsite, in northwest England's Lake District. But something about their activities in May 2004 attracted the attention of a Scotland Yard surveillance team. Photographs of the camp taken by those officers show five of the six men now on trial, accused of plotting the July 2005 attacks, in which four rucksack bombs partially exploded on three Tube trains and a London bus.

Muktah Said Ibrahim, 28, Yassin Omar, 26, Ramzi Mohammed, 25, Hussein Osman, 28, and Adel Yahya, 24, are charged with conspiracy to murder and conspiracy to cause explosions on July 21, 2005. The first pictures of the men under surveillance were released yesterday after being shown to the jury in their trial at a London court. The group were beginning to pack up their tents when officers arrived in the area on the morning of May 3, 2004. The jury has previously been told that some of the defendants later attended camps in Scotland and in Kent, southeast England, and that one of them told friends he was "getting fit for jihad".

Detective Constable Philip Marshall, who took pictures as the group apparently did exercises, said: "They appeared to be running up and down in the area where they were pictured. They had rucksacks on."

Various police photographs showed Mr Omar, the alleged Warren Street Tube bomber, wearing a white hooded top and standing in prayer. Mr Mohammed, the alleged Oval bomber, was shown in camouflage trousers, in prayer and carrying a large rucksack. Mr Yahya, who is accused of helping to plan the attacks but was abroad when they occurred, is also shown praying in a line of other men. Mr Osman, accused of the Shepherd's Bush bomb attempt, was pictured wearing a white T-shirt, carrying a rucksack, walking with a stick. Mr Ibrahim, accused of trying to detonate a bomb on the top deck of a No26 bus, was caught on film carrying a heavy rucksack.

The third day of the trial revealed the extent of contact between the authorities and Mr Ibrahim, the alleged leader of the bomb cell. Five months after the camping trip, he was arrested outside Debenhams department store in London's Oxford Street, where he and two other men had set up a stall to distribute Islamic literature. Then on the night of December 11, 2004, he and two companions were detained at Heathrow airport as they waited to board a flight to Islamabad. Mr Ibrahim's luggage contained pound stg. 2000 in cash, a camera, sleeping bag and first aid kit. Rizwan Majiv, who was with Mr Ibrahim, also had a large amount of cash, a first aid kit in a camouflaged box and extracts from a manual on treating ballistics injuries. During questioning, Mr Ibrahim claimed he was going to Pakistan to attend Mr Majiv's wedding. But he did not know the name of the bride or the circumstances of the betrothal.

The court also heard yesterday that Mr Omar married with unusual haste just four days before the attempted bombings. All six defendants deny the charges against them.
Posted by:Fred

#8  Ex-Lib has that part right - most religions, even some cults (the nutty hari-krishnas come to mind), aren't engaged in trying to conquer the world and convert them to their religion by force. The death-cult of Islam needs to be rooted out and allowed to die an unnatural death - benefiting an unnatural "religion". Hell, even the Baptists, who are quite a militant sect, are far more peaceful than even the most pleasant muzzies. One of these days, we're going to have to come to terms with the fact that with Islam, it's either "us or them", and "they" smell.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2007-01-19 14:55  

#7  Always heard that when the big quake hits California, only JW's will survive. They're in everyone's doorways...
Posted by: Frank G   2007-01-19 14:34  

#6  Speak for yourself. I have long suspected a Quaker bid for global domination beneath all the thees and the thous and the pacificism and what-not.
Posted by: Excalibur   2007-01-19 12:47  

#5  C'mon, guys, ex-lib is good people. I think the point is that Jehovah's Witnesses are not attempting to violently take over the world. Try Quakers or Lutherans instead, and the point still holds.
Posted by: trailing wife   2007-01-19 11:35  

#4  I should imagine if the JW's really got organised they could kick the Mohamedans' ass in the information war.
Posted by: Howard UK   2007-01-19 08:50  

#3  That the world is being run around by the Mohammedan sect is just beyone me. Substitute Jehovah's Witnesses, and one can see how nuts it all really is.

wtf are you fucking nuts "ex-lib" , or smoking crack again?,
fyi, annoying as hell magazine sellers are not a threat to Western civilization. maybe you are though eh!
Posted by: RD   2007-01-19 07:59  

#2  Jehovah's Witnesses, and one can see how nuts it all really is.

AFAIK the Jehova's Wintnesses don't crash planes on buildings, don't fuck nine year olds and don't dream of nuking everyone who stands oin their path.
Posted by: JFM   2007-01-19 07:16  

#1  "The court also heard yesterday that Mr Omar married with unusual haste just four days before the attempted bombings."

Getting in practice for those 72 virgins, Omar? Disgusting.

That the world is being run around by the Mohammedan sect is just beyone me. Substitute Jehovah's Witnesses, and one can see how nuts it all really is.

Political enterprises masquerading as religion should be exposed as the cults they are, and the economic/power aspirations of such groups should be clearly spelled out. Follow the money.

When Americans think of religion, they generally think of respecting religion.

The "Islam" of the fanatic Mohammendans should not even be legitimized as "terror" by the civilized world, but should be exposed for what it really is--a dangerous quasi-religious sect using religious threats to accomplish sociopolitical goals.
Posted by: ex-lib   2007-01-19 01:58  

00:00