You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
My Response to Dinesh D'Souza
2007-01-22
By Robert Spencer

When I saw the above screenshot at Hot Air of a new Fox News promo, I immediately thought of Dinesh D'Souza, who in his new book The Enemy At Home says that "the cultural left in this country is responsible for causing 9/11." I do not believe that either the left or the right in America is responsible for causing 9/11, which I believe took place because of the expansionist and totalitarian jihad ideology and the renewed strength of some in the Islamic world to further its ends -- with, to be sure, a healthy sense of grievance against the West used for recruitment purposes. But I have long stressed, and continue to believe on the basis of numerous historical precedents, that those grievances, if redressed, would not end the jihad, which would simply continue to recruit on the basis of different grievances.

In any case, I just discovered, via referrals from Powerline, that D'Souza goes farther, and blames me also for Islamic terrorism. I have his book but haven't finished reading it yet -- when I wrote this and this about interviews he conducted, I didn't know this was in his book. But I just found this on page 278:

In order to build alliances with traditional Muslims, the right must take three critical steps. First, stop attacking Islam. Conservatives have to cease blaming Islam for the behavior of the radical Muslims. Recently the right has produced a spate of Islamophobic tracts with titles like Islam Unveiled, Sword of the Prophet, and The Myth of Islamic Tolerance. There is probably no better way to repel traditional Muslims, and push them into the radical camp, than to attack their religion and their prophet.

Posted by:ryuge

#5  "there is some confluence of purpose between leftists living in the West and radical Islam in terms of taking out the West"??? THEY'RE ALLIES.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2007-01-22 14:43  

#4  Indeed, a shame. Sounds like D'Souza lays out the right's version of the "neo-con conspiracy," with similarly spurious, overwrought, and stupid results. The left sucks for a lot of reasons -- but causing 9/11 is not one of them. Islamic supremacists caused 9/11, and conflating or diverting attention from that is never helpful.
Posted by: exJAG   2007-01-22 09:02  

#3  His book on abortion politics, Party of Death, was also spot-on.

This, on the other hand . . . well, what no mo uro said.
Posted by: Mike   2007-01-22 08:19  

#2  It's too bad. D'Souza's book about Gramscian political correctness and speech codes in the American education industry was an important book and still resonates today (witness the Heidi Cullen "make my ideological enemies unpersons" incident).

Unfortunately, he falls into the trap that many conservatives do, and confuses the hot war with radical Islam and its silent majority of supporters within the Islamic world with the cold war against cultural Marxism here at home. TO be sure, there is some confluence of purpose between leftists living in the West and radical Islam in terms of taking out the West, but they are NOT the same enemy and each will require different tactics to defeat.
Posted by: no mo uro   2007-01-22 07:51  

#1  D'Souza's d'nuts.
Posted by: Rob Crawford   2007-01-22 07:42  

00:00