You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Senator Reid gets another Real Estate Deal
2007-01-29
HT-Instapundit: Story from the LA TIMES
BULLHEAD CITY, ARIZ. — It's hard to buy undeveloped land in booming northern Arizona for $166 an acre. But now-Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid effectively did just that when a longtime friend decided to sell property owned by the employee pension fund that he controlled.

In 2002, Reid (D-Nev.) paid $10,000 to a pension fund controlled by Clair Haycock, a Las Vegas lubricants distributor and his friend for 50 years. The payment gave the senator full control of a 160-acre parcel in Bullhead City that Reid and the pension fund had jointly owned [Reid already owned some of this via a 1980 deal]. Reid's price for the equivalent of 60 acres of undeveloped desert was less than one-tenth of the value the assessor placed on it at the time.

Six months after the deal closed, Reid introduced legislation to address the plight of lubricants dealers who had their supplies disrupted by the decisions of big oil companies. It was an issue the Haycock family had brought to Reid's attention in 1994, according to a source familiar with the events....
Posted by:mhw

#8  Yeah, gorb. How come?
You'd almost think that...Reid is crooked or corrupt or can be bought or something...
Posted by: tu3031   2007-01-29 14:47  

#7  How come this kind of thing never falls into my lap, yet it falls into his twice?
Posted by: gorb   2007-01-29 14:28  

#6  Icerigger, we might be able to figure this out. Get the address of the property and try zillow.com for the comparables. I know you can do houses this way, wonder if you can do undeveloped property?
Posted by: Steve White   2007-01-29 14:19  

#5  Good point, Icerigger. When we were small-time real estate magnates (very, very small time, but I learnt to use tools, and even got my very own hammer!) we valued properties based on "comparables sold", not comparable list prices. Generally comps sold were 10-20% lower than the list prices, which were often enough based on pride, need, and hope.
Posted by: trailing wife   2007-01-29 13:33  

#4  "The Culture of Corruption". Now under new management...
Posted by: tu3031   2007-01-29 09:26  

#3  I'm soo surprised.
Posted by: Mike N.   2007-01-29 08:57  

#2  one-tenth of the value the assessor placed on it at the time.

Right now I'm sitting in an appraiser's office (not assessor's) which was founded in 1940's. These guys are good and with that experience comes some observations.

The assessor's value is a red herring. What were comparable sales going for at the time? Anyone who wants to value their property based on an assessor's value is not coming to the party fully armed. Typically they are off by 20% (well below what we are talking about here). But what does undeveloped desert go for then and now? Just the facts Dan-o. It is entirely possible this was above board but it is also possible that the deal was even hotter.

That being said, if this was a sweet deal then Reid was part of a pension fund fraud scam. Would this be a Federal case? Could be but I'll let the lawyers on the board comment on this. Ether way it sounds like Harry got his cake.
Posted by: Icerigger   2007-01-29 08:57  

#1  Best Government money can buy.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2007-01-29 08:46  

00:00