You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Democrats in daHouse – Hang onto your Wallets
2007-01-30
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Democrats have unveiled a massive spending bill combining the budgets of 13 Cabinet agencies with increases in aid for lower-income college students, while cutting President Bush's funding requests for foreign aid and closing military bases.
GoshÂ…whooda thunk it?
House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, Tuesday slammed Democrats' plans to advance the huge $463.5 billion measure through the House on Wednesday without giving Republicans or rank and file Democrats a chance to offer changes in an Appropriations Committee session or on the floor. Most lawmakers - and the public - were to get their first chances to read the budget tome Tuesday, barely a day before the House was supposed to vote it up or down. "If we're going to spend $463 billion of the taxpayers' funds, we ought to have more than an hours' worth of debate, Boehner said. "And maybe the (Democratic) majority ought to let Democrats and Republicans offer amendments."
There’s that Democrat pre-election pledge of “Spirit of Cooperation” in action.
But Democrats such as Appropriations Committee Chairman David Obey of Wisconsin had little sympathy, saying Republicans wouldn't make tough budget choices before the election and didn't try to clean up the mess afterward in a lame duck session.
HmmmÂ…looks like all those years of pouting have made it tough for good ole Dave to conceal his vindictive side.
The bill would freeze most federal accounts at 2006 levels, though there are numerous exceptions so agencies can avoid furloughs and hiring freezes, and for a few programs favored by Democrats such as health research and education. And politically sacrosanct programs such as medical care for veterans and active-duty military personnel eat up much of an approximately $10 billion-to-$12 billion pot scraped together by staff aides by freezing other accounts. Veterans would receive $3.5 billion over last year for medical coverage, while active duty fighters and their families would benefit from a 6 percent hike.
In other words: we loath the military butÂ…seeÂ…we toldjaÂ…in our own wayÂ…we support the troops.
Also among the beneficiaries is the National Institutes of Health, which would receive a $620 million budget hike, about 2 percent. The FBI, facing hiring curbs, would get a modest $200 million increase in its $6 billion budget. The maximum Pell Grant for lower-income college students would increase by $260 to $4,310. While modest, it's the first increase since 2003. Activists pressing for big boosts to combat AIDS, malaria and tuberculosis overseas won a $1.3 billion increase - to $4.5 billion. That's enough to fund the president's $225 million initiative to fight malaria and increase the U.S. contribution to the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria to $724 million.
Can you sayÂ…Special interest payoff?
But Bush's request for the Millennium Challenge Corporation, which channels foreign aid to countries implementing economic and political reforms, appears frozen. Some of Bush's initiatives, such as a $5.5 billion request to implement a round of military base closures passed two years ago, absorbed deep cuts. Deputy Defense Secretary Gordon England warned lawmakers last month that shortfalls for the base closing initiative "could result in postponing scheduled redeployments from overseas stations to the United States" as well as slow the Army's moves to boost overseas deployment in smaller, more nimble fighting units. Negotiators cut $3 billion from Bush's base closing request, but may look to make up some of the shortfall in the $100 billion-plus Iraq funding bill scheduled to advance this spring.
We donÂ’t need no steenkinÂ’ military re-alignmentÂ… not when we got our populist programs to advance! JeeezÂ…the 2008 election is just around the corner.
Posted by:DepotGuy

#9  Cyber Sarge is right. The "silver lining" to this is that the "O&M" and Salary budgets remained locked at the FY06 levels. It also (by some accounts) cuts out a LOT of pork.

The FBI, facing hiring curbs, would get a modest $200 million increase in its $6 billion budget.

That can't be right. FBI only gets $6 billion? I know it's a lot in terms of taxes, but to put it in perspective, the EPA gets $8-9 billion. Of course, a LOT of EPA's budget is "Special Appropriations" or what we call pork too.
Posted by: BA   2007-01-30 20:14  

#8  While I am not in favor of the Dems ramming this through I do like the part of freezing budgets. I would also favor SHRINKING some budgets and elimniating some agencies that exists for no reason what so ever (ie Indian Affairs, Education, etc).
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2007-01-30 17:26  

#7  Yep, she killed all the unborn baby ducks.
Posted by: Shipman   2007-01-30 16:13  

#6  Rachel Carson. The Al Gore of the 1950's.
Posted by: tu3031   2007-01-30 15:44  

#5  Rachel Carson

There's a Middle School near me by that name. I hadn't heard what she was known for before now.
Posted by: eLarson   2007-01-30 15:42  

#4  That's it. I'm moving to Australia.
Posted by: DarthVader   2007-01-30 13:48  

#3  A little background: this appears to be (though strangly, the article never mentions it) the appropriations bill for fiscal year 2007 which began Oct. 1, 2006. Uncle has been operating for 4 months on "continuing resolutions" that maintain spending levels at the prior year's level. This bill would essentially just make that policy official for the rest of the year. For many years now, Congress has not been able to pass appropriations bills prior to the end of the fiscal year, which results in a big "catch-all" bill with little discretion as to what to fund and why, but plenty of pork. More evidence of Congress blowing off their responsibilities (not that we need more evidence).
Posted by: Spot   2007-01-30 13:23  

#2  "Democrats have unveiled a massive spending bill."

May as well make a keyboard macro for that phrase, it's gonna be a long two years...

Posted by: Dave D.   2007-01-30 13:04  

#1  Ya' know how you can fight malaria?

BRING BACK DDT!!!

It has been scientifically shown that, Rachel Carson's accusations notwithstanding, DDT is effective and does not result in the massive ecological damage that Carson said it did.

Posted by: FOTSGreg   2007-01-30 12:44  

00:00