| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: WoT |
| Pentagon Halts Sale of F-14 Parts |
| 2007-01-31 |
| WASHINGTON (AP) - The Pentagon said Tuesday it had stopped selling surplus F-14 parts, announcing the step after congressional criticism of security weaknesses that had given buyers for countries including Iran access to the aircraft parts and other valuable gear. Sales of parts from the recently retired fleet were halted last Friday, Defense Logistics Agency spokesman Jack Hooper said, adding that marketing of the parts will remain suspended until a ``comprehensive review'' is completed. He did not immediately elaborate. The decision comes as a Democratic senator moves to cut off all Pentagon sales of surplus F-14 parts, saying the military's marketing of the spares ``defies common sense'' in light of their importance to Iran. Sen. Ron Wyden's bill came in response to an investigation by The Associated Press that found weaknesses in surplus-sale security that allowed buyers for countries including Iran and China to surreptitiously obtain sensitive U.S. military equipment including Tomcat parts. The Oregon Democrat's legislation would ban the Defense Department from selling surplus F-14 parts and prohibit buyers who have already acquired surplus Tomcat parts from exporting them. |
| Posted by:Steve White |
| #13 Mike K: where have you been? I thought I was the only one standing on the Grumman bandstand (notice the conspicuous absence of the Northrop part of the name). I got to work on the Bombcats @ PAX RVR and was hip deep in all the Skypig upgrades (plastic wing, SWIP Block 1A, etc). Agree 100% about the Lawn Dart being a political airplane and no legs. Go read "Pentagon Paradox." In my heart of hearts I believe that the Lawn Dart Mafia had a say in (then) SecDef Cheney's decision to pull the plug on the Dorito, also. Look at the bright side: lost the KA-6 gained the (K)S-3A ( buddy store on one side) "snort" Another plus: all the Florida scuba dudes have a neat new artifical reef, called " Intruder Reef." (guess what it is made from) |
| Posted by: USN, ret. 2007-01-31 22:07 |
| #12 It's almost as if someone really planned in advance to downgrade our seaborne airstrike capabilities, which had been built up steadfastly over many years. Let's see, just who was it who was in charge during the mid-90s, I seem to forget... |
| Posted by: Glunter Shise3857 2007-01-31 18:53 |
| #11 ...Almost forgot - the jigs were ordered destroyed a long while back, IIRC early 90s. Mike |
| Posted by: Mike Kozlowski 2007-01-31 17:01 |
| #10 USN and Mike- The late model Tomcats - especially the Bombcats -gave incredible service during the initial stages of the GWOT. Although their bombload wasn't quite what the F-18 can carry, it could do it a heck of a lot farther, faster, and more reliably - plus it still had the ability to be a world class dogfighter and carry the AIM-54 Phoenix. However, the USN had decreed that the Mike |
| Posted by: Mike Kozlowski 2007-01-31 16:57 |
| #9 What is really interesting is that it took a Dem senator to do something, when all the Trunks didn't. Mike: can you elaborate on the comment about the USN not ever wanting the Tomcat to come back? I know they destroyed all tooling for the P-6M and the USAF did the same to the B-35/-49 and various Blackbird version tooling, but not aware of anything like that for the -14. |
| Posted by: USN, Ret. 2007-01-31 15:32 |
| #8 the USN has a strong interest in NEVER seeing it come back, but that's another story Why's that? |
| Posted by: Mike 2007-01-31 15:29 |
| #7 If an Oregon Democrat wants it stopped, Then maybe, just maybe, this Oregon Dem had a campaign contribution from Soodies. |
| Posted by: gromgoru 2007-01-31 13:30 |
| #6 #5 There may be more here than meets the eye. If an Oregon Democrat wants it stopped, something useful may have been going on. Even a blind squrrel finds a nut now and then. |
| Posted by: Redneck Jim 2007-01-31 10:51 |
| #5 There may be more here than meets the eye. If an Oregon Democrat wants it stopped, something useful may have been going on. |
| Posted by: Grunter 2007-01-31 10:29 |
| #4 I'm all for selling them to Iran ..... With GPS embedded .... Self destruct embedded.... |
| Posted by: DarthVader 2007-01-31 09:49 |
| #3 ...This is without question one of the dumbest moves anybody has made in a long, long time, and I have no sympathy for anyone involved. The fact of the matter is that only one other nation on the planet flies the Tomcat, and they are our sworn enemies. We have no intention of bringing the 'Cat back into service (NOTE: When a US military aircraft leaves the inventory, every operational trace of it is literally erased from the inventory. In the case of the 'Cat, it was even more thorough, because the USN has a strong interest in NEVER seeing it come back, but that's another story)and every last one of those parts should have been de-mil'ed or destroyed, and THEN sold for their scrap value. Mike |
| Posted by: Mike Kozlowski 2007-01-31 08:59 |
| #2 Oregon Democrat's legislation Whoa! What's wrong with this picture? I thought the Dems were for giving the stuff away for free? |
| Posted by: Bobby 2007-01-31 06:24 |
| #1 C'est bon. Hehehehehe. |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2007-01-31 04:37 |