You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
'Democrat Party' Is A GOP Slur, A Smear, 'Jarring Verging On Ugly'
2007-02-03
The amazing liberal vapors over President BushÂ’s use of the word "Democrat" to describe, er, Democrats, continues. In an NPR interview with Juan Williams, President Bush claimed it was a simple mistake in his State of the Union speech, but liberals quickly found more of these grievous offenses in searching speech texts at the White House website. Certain left-wing media critics who lay face down in worship at the feet of Hillary Clinton are now insisting that the word "Democrat" is a "smear" and an "oft-used Republican slur." The Washington Post and The New York Times each produced stories on Bush's denial of this microscopic scandal. (Clay Waters handled it at Times Watch here.)

But my favorite fuss comes from former Newsweek reporter and Carter speechwriter Hendrik Hertzberg at The New Yorker, who says the plain D-word is "jarring verging on ugly. It fairly screams ‘rat.’" He then imagined Republicans want to destroy the Democrats like Israel’s enemies want to wipe out Israel, and compared them to a street gang:
An alternative view is that it’s called the Democratic Party. The Democratic Party itself takes this view, and many nonpartisan authorities agree. The American Heritage College Dictionary, for example, defines the noun "Democratic Party" as "One of the two major US political parties, owing its origin to a split in the Democratic-Republican Party under Andrew Jackson in 1828." (It defines "Democrat n" as "A Democratic Party member" and "Democratic adj" as "Of, relating to, or characteristic of the Democratic Party," but gives no definition for—indeed, makes no mention of—"Democrat Party n" or "Democrat adj".) Other dictionaries, and reference works generally, appear to be unanimous on these points. The broader literate public also comes down on the "Democratic" side, as indicated by frequency of usage. A Google search for "Democratic Party" yields around forty million hits. "Democrat Party" fetches fewer than two million.

There’s no great mystery about the motives behind this deliberate misnaming. "Democrat Party" is a slur, or intended to be—a handy way to express contempt. Aesthetic judgments are subjective, of course, but "Democrat Party" is jarring verging on ugly. It fairly screams "rat." At a slightly higher level of sophistication, it’s an attempt to deny the enemy the positive connotations of its chosen appellation. During the Cold War, many people bridled at obvious misnomers like "German Democratic Republic," and perhaps there are some members of the Republican Party (which, come to think of it, has been drifting toward monarchism of late) who genuinely regard the Democratic Party as undemocratic. Perhaps there are some who hope to induce it to go out of existence by refusing to call it by its name, a la terming Israel "the Zionist entity." And no doubt there are plenty of others who say "Democrat Party" just to needle the other side while signalling solidarity with their own—the partisan equivalent of flashing a gang sign.
The WashPost account from Michael Abramowitz added this nugget, that Democrat-leaning White House reporters were hyperventilating in the briefing room:
White House press secretary Tony Snow seemed peeved with reporters asking about the Bush mispronunciation at his morning press "gaggle" yesterday, accusing the reporters of making "three mountains out of a molehill" and suggesting that the press was not much interested when Democrats bashed Bush with language calling him a "loser" or a "liar."
Posted by:Anonymoose

#13  Calls for another case of ammunition.
Posted by: SR-71   2007-02-03 20:32  

#12  Oh balls! That was brilliant! I never thought about what making the same gaff would do to the word republican!
Posted by: Mike N.   2007-02-03 20:26  

#11  GWB just joked in a meeting with members of Congress - "I have been accused of occasionally mangling the English language. And so I appreciate you inviting the head of the Republic Party." Apparently the meeting went pretty well.
Posted by: KBK   2007-02-03 19:49  

#10  I'm telling you people, DemocRAT and just plain 'Rat are hurtful and offensive terms that cause those offended to withdraw from all discussion. I much prefer the less inflammatory and more inclusive term "Rodent Party."
Posted by: Atomic Conspiracy   2007-02-03 17:35  

#9  So, how are they going to make me listen w/this "Fairness Doctrine?"

I guess I shouldn't buy and radio stocks.
Posted by: anonymous2u   2007-02-03 17:32  

#8  Dem-o-crats!
Eat fried rats!
Posted by: Mike   2007-02-03 17:10  

#7  "OK, folks. How long until they find someway to frame criticism of the Democrat Party to be a hate crime?"

Figure about two years from now; Hillary Clinton will put the Fairness In Speech Act before Congress less than a week after her inauguration, and it will be quickly passed by the House and Senate (with all 82 Senate Democrats and all 393 House Democrats voting yea). The only debate will be over whether enforcement authority should be in the hands of the FCC, which will honcho the New Fairness Doctrine (like the one we used to have, except on steroids + PCP) to kill conservative talk radio, or whether it should devolve to the new Federal Fairness Enforcement Administration, which will be created to ensure that everything is always fair, for everybody, everywhere, in every way, that all outcomes are equal and that nobody is unequal to anybody else (except for those who are more equal, of course). Barbara Boxer will try to get her pet project, the new Gender Equity Administration, involved, but will not succeed.

All of this, naturally, will be done For The Children™...

(Just thought I'd share the nightmare... heh, heh. Think it can't happen?)

Posted by: Dave D.   2007-02-03 16:52  

#6  OK, folks. How long until they find someway to frame criticism of the Democrat Party to be a hate crime?

Oh, BTW, Asshole Arkin, in his "apology" piece after he called US troops mercenaries, wrote the following:

They hide behind the constitution and the flag and then spew an anti-Democrat, anti-liberal, anti-journalism, anti-dissent, and anti-citizen message that reflects a certain contempt for the American people.

Huh. Why aren't any lefties hyperventilating over that? Probably because they're too busy shaking their heads in agreement with everything else he said.
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2007-02-03 13:53  

#5  Whatever they are, they certainly aren't democratic.
Posted by: Pappy   2007-02-03 13:34  

#4  "Democrat" with accent on the "rat" just isn't insulting enough. I've been using the term "Quislingcrat" in my blog comments for years...whaddaya think, Rantburgers?
Posted by: Ricky bin Ricardo (Albu Babaloo)   2007-02-03 12:56  

#3  Well then, Democrats they are!
Posted by: Steve White   2007-02-03 10:57  

#2  ThereÂ’s no great mystery about the motives behind this deliberate misnaming. "Democrat Party" is a slur, or intended to be—a handy way to express contempt.

There's no mystery at all - I say 'Democrat' all the time as a slur!
Posted by: Raj   2007-02-03 09:59  

#1  I'd a swore this was Scrappleface. Reality mirrors fiction. Skeery.
Posted by: Deacon Blues   2007-02-03 09:29  

00:00