You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa North
Chirac says West Sahara plan 'constructive'
2007-02-07
Any RB experts on West Sahara autonomy? If M. Jacques Le Weasel is for it, I think I ought to be against it, but I'm not sure.
French President Jacques Chirac praised a Moroccan plan to grant self-rule to the separatist region of Western Sahara as "constructive" after talks with Moroccan ministers here Monday. Chirac held talks in Paris with Morocco's Interior Minister Chabib Benmoussa and a delegation of officials from Rabat, who gave the French president an early look at the plan, which is due to be presented to the UN in April. A statement from Chirac's office thanked the Moroccan delegation for "reserving for France a first look at its considerations for the future of Western Sahara and of the plan accompanying it, which it characterises as 'constructive'".

Morocco annexed the desolate but phosphate-rich northwest African territory after the withdrawal of the region's former colonial power Spain and neighbour Mauritania in the 1970s. A war ensued with the armed Polisario Front independence movement which was set up in 1973 and established itself as the sole representative of the nomadic Saharan or Saharawi people. The conflict ended in 1991 with a UN-brokered ceasefire. Moroccan Communications Minister Nabil Benabdellah said the plan for the southern desert region rests on "three axes," namely "the sovereignty of Morocco... the social and cultural characteristics of the (Western Sahara) region and international criteria for autonomy."

But the plan was roundly rejected by Saharawi foreign minister Mohamed Salem Ould Salek, who declared it "null and void". Ould Salek, a member of the Saharawi government in exile, told journalists in Algiers the plan was dead in the water. "The occupier's plan is null and void. It is stillborn," he said. The minister warned that "the people are going to resist, fight and campaign against it until they get full satisfaction for their right of self-determination, whatever the cost." He said the "Moroccan regime, unfortunately comforted by France" would have to bear the "dangerous consequences" for the plan.
O dear. That sure sounds a lot like he's setting the table for a steamy hot serving of Legitimate Rights™, with a side order of Humiliation™ and perhaps a flaming dish of Dire Revenge Jubilee™ for dessert. Waiter, check please.
Of course he rejected it. Standard Middle East negotiating tactics 101: reject everything til you get what you want, or until someone threatens to pound the beejeebus out of you. The Moroccans can't do the latter (they tried and failed) so he'll wait for the former. It's only been 30-plus years, time is on his side.
A government source in Rabat, meanwhile, said that other UN Security Council members would also be given a look at the proposal. "After France ... government emissaries will be sent to the United States, Britain, Russia and China," the source told AFP. There will also be talks with Spain as well as non-permanent members of the Security Council such as Qatar, Peru and Italy, the source said.
Posted by:Seafarious

#10  Weeeellll - my bad, then!
Posted by: Secret Master   2007-02-07 21:40  

#9  IIRC, the Polisario is a far leftist organization more closely aligned with Libya and Syria than "anarcho-capitalists". The former Kingdom of Morocco was divided between the French and the Spanish, and teh Moroccans had little to say about it. Mauritania didn't exist until the French created it.

We've seen the disaster the French and British created in carving up the Ottoman Empire. It also exists in how the French, British, Portuguese, Spanish, and Belgians carved up most of Africa.

I wouldn't trust Shitrack to move my trashcan to the front of my house for pickup day.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2007-02-07 18:23  

#8   To do that, there were a couple of places where there was a 360-degree tunnel!

!
I would have made that a vacation destination, well, except that's more that 500 miles from my Opthamologist.
Posted by: Shipman   2007-02-07 18:11  

#7  If being yet another permanent "refugee" camp UN dependency with free education, free housing, water shipped in, etc. on the US tax-payer's dime makes you pro-democracy anarcho-capitalists then I guess that would be right. Of course, these folks get none of the press of the you-know-whos because they are no Jews involved. Neither does the 1700 mile wall Morocco built to keep the anarcho-capitalists out in the desert. Again, no Jews on either side so the "left", the Nazis and the muslims could care less.

http://www.wsahara.net/morberm.html
Posted by: Excalibur   2007-02-07 15:28  

#6  I read somewhere that the Polisario are pro-democracy anarcho-capitalists... or close enough for government work. Which would definately make them the good guys, right?
Posted by: Secret Master   2007-02-07 12:50  

#5  That's more Sahara xperience than I've had, so , yah, Bobby's our expert.

Thanks for the travelogue! Sorry about the railroad, I was looking forward to my trip on the Phosphate Mine Express.

Posted by: Seafarious   2007-02-07 11:12  

#4  Ship - Nah, too expensive. I tried to get the French engineers to lower their criteria to something more like the original transcontinental railroad - say a 35 mph speed thru the mountains. They hadda have 60 mph. To do that, there were a couple of places where there was a 360-degree tunnel!
Posted by: Bobby   2007-02-07 11:04  

#3  The the railway get finished?
Posted by: Shipman   2007-02-07 08:38  

#2  From my six-month stay in Morocco in 1976 -

Morocco always considered the northern half of Spanish Sahara to be Morrocan and when the Spanish pulled out, Morocco and Mauritania agreed to divide the former Spanish colony/protectorate. Some locals (Polisario) thought they should have the run of the country and Algeria supported them, because they didn't want the Moroccans to have it. There were several smaller Spanish enclaves in Morocco which were integrated into Morocco (Sidi Ifni, which I visited, comes to mind).

I was there to design a railroad from Marrakesh to El Layoon (the phosphate shipping port on the Atlantic)in the contested area. The King hoped the railroad would unify the portions like the transcontinental railroad united the eastern and western US. It was too expensive, of course, since the French set the design standards too high, and there wasn't much between Marrakesh and El Layoon - except a lovely and expensive mountain range, the popular beach resort of Agadir, and a whole lotta sand dunes.

Doezat make me an "expert"?
Posted by: Bobby   2007-02-07 06:44  

#1  I will always remember Chirac's words to CNN, shortly before the liberation of Iraq, desperately trying to prevent it: "I am sure Saddam Hussein loves the Iraqi people."

Don't trust one word this man pronounces. Don't trust his breath. Don't trust his power-lusting, vain shell.
Posted by: Kalle (kafir forever)   2007-02-07 02:19  

00:00