You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Short Attention Span Theater-
Today's Idiot
2007-02-11
Search called off for missing kayaker

Wellington - The search for a man who disappeared while trying to paddle a kayak 1,600 kilometres from Australia to New Zealand was called off Sunday night after it was revealed that he was not carrying an immersion suit.
Fricking genius...
Andrew McAuley's upturned kayak was found late Saturday night, about 80 kilometres off New Zealand's Milford Sound where he was due the next morning at the end of a journey that began in Tasmania's Fortescue Bay on January 11.
So he went 1500 klicks without an immersion suit. It's that last 100 that'll get you every time ...
Two helicopters searched the area on Sunday without finding any trace of the 39-year-old adventurer who was trying to complete the first solo kayak crossing of one of the world's roughest stretches of water.
And how much did the choppers cost? Less than the price of a DUI dry-suit, I reckon...
McAuley's wife Vicki and five-year-old son Finlay were awaiting his arrival at Milford, in New Zealand's South Island Fiordland.
I feel bad for them- seriously.
A Maritime New Zealand spokesman told Radio New Zealand the search had been called off and would be reviewed overnight. She said family members had advised that contrary to earlier information, McAuley was not carrying an immersion suit, which would have given him a better chance of survival.
In other words- IDIOT.
The helicopters searched a 10-square-kilometre area around where his kayak was found after a garbled emergency distress call was monitored on radio. His life jacket was not on the boat, raising hopes that he would have survived and be floating nearby. Radio New Zealand said McAuley had endured many capsizings, giant waves and the attention of sharks on his journey below the 40th parallel, an area that regularly produces some of the world's worst weather.

He was paddling a sea kayak fitted with a cockpit cover, offering some protection from the elements, and a solar panel to power instruments and communications equipment.
All of that, yet no dry-suit. What a fool.
Posted by:Free Radical

#9  Dave D.---Forget him, just focus on lovely Gracie of Rangerup fame. She is just over there off to starboard, like a siren. Heh.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2007-02-11 15:55  

#8  Damn Blogads... every time I get ready to comment on an article, I reach the bottom of the thread and there's that damnfool picture of Dippy Dennis The Moonbat with the big ears.

I forgot what I was gonna say.

Posted by: Dave D.   2007-02-11 15:47  

#7  "Please do not chum the wildlife!"
Posted by: Frank G   2007-02-11 15:32  

#6  why did he attempt the kayak 1,600 kilometres from Australia to New Zealand thingy?

motives?, likely for the adventure/challenge of putting his life on the line in a tiny kayak crossing a notorious patch of Sea.

And for the recognition he'd receive for surviving the dangerous voyage. Well he didn't make it.

Andrew McAuley did accomplish something though, I'd hazard a educated guess that the next adventure seeker is already making plans to kayak the very same Sea because it's even more famous now thanks to poor ole dead Andrew.
Posted by: RD   2007-02-11 14:48  

#5  This is a run of ocean where big racing yachts get into serious, and occasional fatal trouble. And now McAuley is telling Davey Jones all about his adventure, while he leaves his widow and a 5 year old son behind. What a selfish moroon.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2007-02-11 13:07  

#4  *snicker* BK
Posted by: Free Radical   2007-02-11 12:02  

#3  Right, then he'd only be as stupid as a guy that would try to cross the worlds roughest stretch of sea by himself, in a kazoo.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2007-02-11 10:55  

#2  There are now reports that he at least OWNED a dry-suit, and that reports that he wasn't wearing it were in error.
This would lower his idiocy level considerably.
Posted by: Free Radical   2007-02-11 10:30  

#1  Hell, a dry suit would have just prolonged the mistake.

It would be like bicycling across Baghdad with with a BeeBee gun.
Posted by: Shipman   2007-02-11 08:50  

00:00