You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
House Democrats Unveil Anti-War Bill
2007-02-13
House Democrats rolled out their resolution opposing President Bush's troop increase in Iraq on Monday, setting up a likely rebuke in a political landscape turned upside-down since Congress' overwhelming 2002 endorsement of force against Saddam Hussein. Lawmakers are expected to vote on a resolution by week's end opposing Bush's decision to send 21,500 more troops to Iraq. The measure states simply that the House "will continue to support and protect" troops serving in Iraq but "disapproves" of the troop buildup.

Debate was to begin Tuesday, and the House vote will mark its first on the war since Democrats won control in the November elections. While the measure is not binding and would not affect the funding of the war, passage would be an embarrassing rejection of Bush's Iraq war policy and could force many Republicans to choose between backing the president or criticizing a deeply unpopular war. "What the American people want to know is: Does their member of Congress support the president's proposed escalation or do they not?" said House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer.

Hoyer, D-Md., told reporters he had heard from about 20 Republicans who said they opposed the troop buildup, and from one Democrat reluctant to support the resolution. The measure's simple language - it totaled just a few dozen words - was crafted to maximize the number of Republicans who would support it and to emphasize support for the troops

While Democrats predicted the measure would pass easily, Republican leaders tried to refocus debate on the measure in hopes of putting Democrats on the defensive. "This resolution is the first step in the Democrats' plan to cut off funding for American troops who are in harm's way, and their leaders have made this abundantly clear," said House Republican leader John Boehner, R-Ohio.
Posted by:Fred

#9  Americans are winners, and if and when they mistakenly elect losers to represent them, they will rectify the situation. We are only 20 and a half months from election day, 2008. Pelosi and her band of idiots have already buried their desire to impeach. By the time November, 2008 arrives, their lack of character will become unsustainable. They will also fail on the border issue.
Posted by: wxjames   2007-02-13 18:22  

#8  "What the American people want to know is: Does their member of Congress support the president's proposed escalation or do they not?"

Hoyer pretty much tips his hand with that statement. These disingenuous whores only care about politics. If not, why donÂ’t they allow any amendments or a Republican alternative to be offered and debated. SimpleÂ…they want to whip the Democratic caucus into lockstep so as to appear unified at the same time attempt to portray the Republicans as divided. DamnÂ…if these poseurs had any idea how transparent they really are they might actually act on principle for once.
Posted by: DepotGuy   2007-02-13 10:41  

#7  These demmhis are a silly, dangerously naive, traitorous bunch of assh*les.
Posted by: JohnQC   2007-02-13 10:07  

#6  Why ed... that would be 'politising the war'. Only Democrats such as Mumra Murtha, Kennedy and the MSM are allowed to do that.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2007-02-13 08:15  

#5  Way past time for commercials showing airliners slamming into the World Trade Centers, people jumping out of the burning skyscapers, decapitated African and Thai villagers, blown up shoppers, hijacked airliners.

Hear the words of Death to America ayatollahs, Saudi and Al Azhar imams and terrorists quoting surahs straight from the koran without the filter of the honey coated media.

Then show the faces of our appeasing Quislings. Come on you Republican leaders. Don't be such pussies.
Posted by: ed   2007-02-13 07:50  

#4  #2 -- Sen. Barack Hussein Obama (D-Jihad) certainly agrees with you. He said so as much in a campaign talk in Iowa last weekend.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2007-02-13 06:33  

#3  I like how ITAR-TASS's belabeling "GUIDED CHAOS", just substitute Dems in future OWG Amerika USSA = SSR/USR, in place of Iran in Iraq-ME. "GUIDED CHAOS" > befits CLINTONISM > "FASCIST" = both HATED DESPICABLE SHOOT-ON-SIGHT NAZI-HITLERIST as well as well-meaning but error-prone LIMITED COMMUNIST WHOM MUST BE TRAINED AND CORRECTED AND RE-EDUCATED BY MOM = GULAG. COMMIE SOCIALIST PERFECTIONISM > e.g. MAINSTREAM CHINESE livin' on a US$1.00+/- a day.

FREREPUBLIC POSTER > America under Dubya is moving towards Communism, etc. and - GOD HELP US ALL - the Commies, etc. don't know how to stop it.
D ***NG it, ITS AMERICA'S = AMERIKA'S FAULT THE COMMUNISTS DON'T KNOW HOW THEY CAN STOP COMMUNISM, HOW TO STOP WHAT THEY DESIRE. D ***ng it, JUST BECUZ THEY FOUGHT AND BETRAYED AND PROTESTED, etc .............@HARD FOR THEIR -ISM DOESN'T MEAN THEY WANNA LIVE UNDER IT. All together now, boyz, wid feeling, AND DON'T YOUSE FORGET IT.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2007-02-13 03:30  

#2  Todd Beamer, your sacrifice was in vain. Your valiant actions, and those of your fellow passengers, saved the lives of worthless men and women whom I'm ashamed to call my countrymen. Rest Peace Todd, God knows you did what you thought best.
Posted by: Robjack   2007-02-13 02:21  

#1  Maybe they should write a book about Great Congressional War Plans. Or Great Congressional Generals. Or Backstabbing is Fun and Easy.
Posted by: whatadeal   2007-02-13 00:11  

00:00