You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
USS Stennis Now On Station
2007-02-20
Backed by a strike group with more than 6,500 sailors and marines as well as additional minesweeping ships, the Stennis joins the carrier USS Dwight D. Eisenhower in line with President BushÂ’s orders for the build-up as a show of strength to Iran.

Top US Navy commander in the Middle East Vice Adm. Patrick Walsh said Iran had brought its war games over the past year into the busy shipping lanes in the Straits of Hormuz, through which two-fifths of the worldÂ’s oil supplies pass.

The moves have alarmed US officials about possible accidental confrontations that could boil over into war. During maneuvers, Iranian sailors have loaded mines onto small mine-laying boats and test-fired a Shahab-3 missile into international waters, said the US vice admiral, very close to the straits.
Posted by:Anonymoose

#9  Grom: not only short on surface minesweeeping assets, but the MH-53D's of yore have been retired with, I believe, no effective replacements. They could tow a sled along at a pretty good clip and clear a lot of ocean. I do not think the -53E's have been rigged for this mission. If anybody knows otherwise, please update me, thanks.
Posted by: USN, ret.   2007-02-20 22:45  

#8  We can but hope that twice as much planning has gone into what to do with Iran *after* it has seven bells kicked out of it. We sure as hell don't want a situation like we had in Iraq for a decade after Gulf War I.

Unless it's a democrat president, that is. Having our military idle during one of those presidencies is the best you can hope for. Sucker would probably order them to surrender.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2007-02-20 18:30  

#7  I hope the Stennis brought a large number of minesweepers with it. But no, let me guess, as soon as any conflict starts, the USN is greatly surprised to find itself critically short of mine countermeasures.
Posted by: gromky   2007-02-20 18:19  

#6  The Great Satan is powerful but very, very stupid (look at them treating these Arab dogs as if they were people). Allah's will shall prevail!
Posted by: MM   2007-02-20 18:05  

#5  Halp us, Jon Kary! The satanic Americans are going to kick our islamo-heinies.
Posted by: SteveS   2007-02-20 17:37  

#4  LOL.

I think the MMs are nervous and they believe that the anti-war LLL and the Dems will keep this from happening.
Posted by: DarthVader   2007-02-20 17:27  

#3  Mike -- after enduring a day with a working co-hart in a foul mood (who knows why) I just LOL when I read that!

Thanks -- I love Rantburg!
Posted by: Sherry   2007-02-20 17:23  

#2  The ball is in Iran's court . . .

"Stennis, anyone?"

[ducks]
Posted by: Mike   2007-02-20 17:15  

#1  Well, the ball is in Iran's court. There would be no confrontations by Iran that would be accidental. We are talking about 40% of the world's oil supply. This is big time stuff with big time stakes. There is enough firepower in two US carrier groups to send the MMs down the well into hell. This isn't Hizb'Allah and a missile firing on an Israeli ship off the coast of Lebanon.

Like I said, ball is in Iran's court. Do they feel lucky today. They better think this over.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2007-02-20 17:08  

00:00