You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
Gore says media miss climate message- "too balanced"
2007-03-01
Journalists have leaned toward balance at expense of consensus data, he says

MURFREESBORO — After being the red-carpet darling of the Academy Awards, it was back to reality Tuesday for Al Gore, who resumed his usual role of hypocritical scold history-spouting wonk as he addressed a gathering of national media ethicists at MTSU.

Gore was the star of An Inconvenient Truth, which won best documentary feature at Sunday night's Oscars. The film showed the slide show presentation the former vice president has given countless times across the nation.
another replay by the GoreBot
Back in Tennessee on Tuesday, Gore told a crowd of about 50 people at the U.S. Media Ethics Summit II that the presentation's single most provocative slide was one that contrasts results of two long-term studies. A 10-year University of California study found that essentially zero percent of peer-reviewed scientific journal articles disagreed that global warming exists, whereas, another study found that 53 percent of mainstream newspaper articles disagreed the global warming premise.
zero percent, huh? Lying sack of sh*t
He noted that recently the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change released its fourth unanimous report calling on world leaders to provide grants and emergency police powers to the elites take action on global warming.

"I believe that is one of the principal reasons why political leaders around the world have not yet taken action," Gore said. "There are many reasons, but one of the principal reasons in my view is more than half of the mainstream media have rejected the scientific consensus implicitly — and I say 'rejected,' perhaps it's the wrong word. They have failed to report that it is the consensus and instead have chosen … balance as bias.
"you need to quit questioning!"
"I don't think that any of the editors or reporters responsible for one of these stories saying, 'It may be real, it may not be real,' is unethical. But I think they made the wrong choice, and I think the consequences are severe.
and he would know unethical
"I think if it is important to look at the pressures that made it more likely than not that mainstream journalists in the United States would convey a wholly inaccurate conclusion about the most important moral, ethical, spiritual and political issue humankind has ever faced."

Gore would not answer any questions from the media after the event.
he NEVER answers questions - too "inconvenient"
Posted by:Frank G

#14  "a crowd of about 50 people"

Now that's just pathetic.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2007-03-01 16:21  

#13  RC asked: Which journals? Ones about climatology, or ones about cosmetology?

Science, Nature, PNAS, PLOS, New Scientist, and about two hundred others.

Posted by: FOTSGreg   2007-03-01 15:53  

#12  DAMN IT - We're being thwarted!!!!!
Posted by: anonymous2u   2007-03-01 15:45  

#11  Question: Since there is an Albedo effect to particulates in the atmosphere (hence Nuclear Winter scenarios) that serves to cool the earth, what has been the effect of all the activity to reduce particulate emissions via stack scrubbers etc.? Not to mention the practice of putting out fires that have added particulates to the air in the past.

Remember how much Mt. Pinatubo effected the temps for a while?
Posted by: AlanC   2007-03-01 11:53  

#10  Al should consult with former Canadian defense minister Paul Hellyer.
Posted by: DepotGuy   2007-03-01 11:47  

#9  "too balanced"
Gore having become seriously unbalanced, I can see how he would make that kind of complaint.
Posted by: eLarson   2007-03-01 11:36  

#8  He might also consider walking more--his girth is getting a wee bit expansive.
Posted by: JohnQC   2007-03-01 11:09  

#7  If Al is really serious about that Nobel Prize, he'll invent a hybrid Gulfstream IV...
Posted by: tu3031   2007-03-01 11:07  

#6  Translation:

"They don't put my prophecy up 24 hours a day, seven days a week. You will all burn in the fires of Global Warming! Repent and follow me! Kill the heretics!"
Posted by: DarthVader   2007-03-01 11:04  

#5  Media Ethics ... did they serve Jumbo Shrimp?
Posted by: doc   2007-03-01 10:59  

#4  The Goracle neglects the obvious cause.
Posted by: doc   2007-03-01 10:47  

#3  Gore told a crowd of about 50 people at the U.S. Media Ethics Summit II...

Yeah that Academy Award really brings out the "crowds".
But it is a Media Ethics Summit...
Posted by: tu3031   2007-03-01 10:45  

#2  Which journals? Ones about climatology, or ones about cosmetology?

Astrology.
Posted by: Steve White   2007-03-01 10:32  

#1  A 10-year University of California study found that essentially zero percent of peer-reviewed scientific journal articles disagreed that global warming exists

Which journals? Ones about climatology, or ones about cosmetology?
Posted by: Rob Crawford   2007-03-01 10:04  

00:00