You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Israel-Palestine-Jordan
George Soros: US Must Respect Hamas' Unity Regime
2007-03-21
NY Review of Books
On Israel, America and AIPAC
By George Soros

The Bush administration is once again in the process of committing a major policy blunder in the Middle East, one that is liable to have disastrous consequences and is not receiving the attention it should. This time it concerns the Israeli–Palestinian relationship. The Bush administration is actively supporting the Israeli government in its refusal to recognize a Palestinian unity government that includes Hamas, which the US State Department considers a terrorist organization. This precludes any progress toward a peace settlement at a time when progress on the Palestinian problem could help avert a conflagration in the greater Middle East.
Note the use of "liable" instead of "likely." That type of language is 2nd grade ebonics. "Liability" is a legal term that refers to the compensatory consequences of culpability. NYRB pinkos should proofread their deranged ideology.
The United States and Israel seek to deal only with the president of the Palestinian Authority, Mahmoud Abbas, in the hope that new elections would deny Hamas the majority it now has in the Palestinian Legislative Council. This is a hopeless strategy because Hamas has said it would boycott early elections, and even if their outcome would result in Hamas's exclusion from the government, no peace agreement would hold without Hamas's support.

In the meantime Saudi Arabia is pursuing a different path. In a February summit in Mecca between Mahmoud Abbas and Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal, the Saudi government worked out an agreement between Hamas and Fatah, which have been clashing violently, to form a national unity government. According to the Mecca accord, Hamas has agreed "to respect international resolutions and the agreements [with Israel] signed by the Palestinian Liberation Organization," including the Oslo Accords. According to press reports on March 15, the new government, like the present one, will be headed by Ismail Haniya, the Hamas prime minister, but Hamas will get nine of the government's twenty-four ministries, as well as an additional minister without portfolio; President Abbas and his Fatah party will control six ministries, and independent representatives—some said to be under the control of Hamas or Fatah—and other political factions will fill the nine remaining ministries.
They want unity, so that they can focus on attempting to destroy Israel.
The Saudi government views this accord as the prelude to the offer of a peace settlement with Israel, along the lines of the 2002 Arab Peace Initiative, a settlement to be guaranteed by Saudi Arabia and other Arab countries, based on the 1967 borders and full recognition of Israel. The offer was meant to be elaborated by Saudi King Abdullah at the Arab League meeting to be hosted by Saudi Arabia at the end of March. But no progress is possible as long as the Bush administration and the Ehud Olmert government persist in their current position of refusing to recognize a unity government that includes Hamas. The recent meeting between Condoleezza Rice, Abbas, and Olmert turned into an empty formality...
Any member of the parasitic House of Saud, is a born terrorist.
Posted by:Sneaze

#20  Fixed link

FOTSGreg: you forgot the single quotes around the URL.
Posted by: xbalanke   2007-03-21 21:37  

#19  If we all close our eyes and try real hard, Soros will have a spleen rupture and be dead within an hour. Ready ? ARG, grunt !
Posted by: wxjames   2007-03-21 20:33  

#18  It looks like Mr. Soros is starting to force a real separation between himself and any Democratic candidate with real intentions of winning the presidency. About bloody time.
Posted by: trailing wife   2007-03-21 16:56  

#17  The article, by George Soros, published in the New York Review of Books, asserts that America should pressure Israel to negotiate with the Hamas-led unity government in the Palestinian territories regardless of whether Hamas recognizes the right of the Jewish state to exist. Mr. Soros goes on to say that one reason America has not embraced this policy is because of the influence of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee.

Garsh, wouldn't that be caving in to the demands of those who wish to restart the Holocaust? Doesn't that violate a host of moral and ethical tenets all at once? Shouldn't Soros just go and piss the hell off?
Posted by: Zenster   2007-03-21 16:35  

#16  Er...Mods, what happened with that link? It seems to be circular.

Posted by: FOTSGreg   2007-03-21 16:27  

#15  Please see,

http://www.usimmigrationlawyers.com/content.cfm/Article/5821/What-is-Naturalization-Revocation--.html

for the process by which Soros can have his naturalization revoked.

Posted by: FOTSGreg   2007-03-21 16:26  

#14  But if you revoke his citizenship you cannot hang him as a traitor.
Posted by: Excalibur   2007-03-21 14:45  

#13  My guess = Hilary will press Obama to make a much stronger, much clearer disavowal of Soros. Not just the wimpy statement above.
Posted by: liberalhawk   2007-03-21 14:33  

#12  My guess = Hilary will press Obama to make a much stronger, much clearer disavowal of Soros. Not just the wimpy statement above.
Posted by: liberalhawk   2007-03-21 14:33  

#11  Ah, just as I said:

Billionaire's Comments on Aipac Are Scored

By ELI LAKE
Staff Reporter of the Sun
March 21, 2007

WASHINGTON — Leading Democrats, including Senator Obama of Illinois, are distancing themselves from an essay published this week by one of their party's leading financiers that called for the Democratic Party to "liberate" itself from the influence of the pro-Israel lobby.

The article, by George Soros, published in the New York Review of Books, asserts that America should pressure Israel to negotiate with the Hamas-led unity government in the Palestinian territories regardless of whether Hamas recognizes the right of the Jewish state to exist. Mr. Soros goes on to say that one reason America has not embraced this policy is because of the influence of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee.

Yesterday, Mr. Obama's presidential campaign issued a dissent from the Hungarian-born billionaire's assessment. " Mr. Soros is entitled to his opinions," a campaign spokeswoman, Jen Psaki, said. "But on this issue he and Senator Obama disagree. The U.S. and our allies are right to insist that Hamas — a terrorist organization dedicated to Israel's destruction — meet very basic conditions before being treated as a legitimate actor. AIPAC is one of many voices that share this view."

The Soros article puts Democrats in the awkward position of choosing between Mr. Soros, a major funder of their causes, and the pro- Israel lobby, whose members are also active in campaign fund-raising. Pressed by The New York Sun, some Democrats aired their differences with Mr. Soros.

Rep. Robert Wexler, a Democrat of Florida who sent out an e-mail to Jewish supporters in his home state last week vouching for Mr. Obama's pro- Israel bona fides, said he too rejected Mr. Soros's comments. " Senator Obama says until the Palestinian government fulfills all three of the quartet requirements, the United States should not and would not recognize the Palestinian government. Senator Obama is clear, Mr. Soros appears to have a different position," Mr. Wexler said. "I agree with Senator Obama and have felt that way for a long time."

Posted by: liberalhawk   2007-03-21 14:31  

#10  George:
1) Why?
2) Why do you care$$
3) Why should we give a fuck what you spew?
Posted by: 3dc   2007-03-21 13:42  

#9  "Respect" and "Hamass" don't belong in the same sentence.

Except in England, that is.
Posted by: mojo   2007-03-21 11:50  

#8  I'll ask what I always ask. What's in it for us, Georgie Boy? What are these fine folks gonna give us in return?
Posted by: tu3031   2007-03-21 10:35  

#7  Why doesn't Soros just buy the Palestinians. They could be his pet Pet Cause.
Posted by: SteveS   2007-03-21 10:18  

#6  1. The Hamas position, of refusing to accept the quartet position, combined with the Saudi initiative in its current form, would start negotiations on a very unfavorable basis for Israel.
2. Interesting that Soros thinks no negotiation can stick that Hamas opposes, but doesnt seem to hold the same view vis a vis, say, Likud. Ultimately if Fatah makes peace, and Hamas THEN attempts to undermine Fatah, it will be up to the international community to back up Fatah.
3. Its not surprising that Soros is taking this position. The question will be, how much does this make him untouchable in Dem politics?
Posted by: liberalhawk   2007-03-21 09:59  

#5  Soros can go take a flying fuck.
Posted by: danking_70   2007-03-21 09:54  

#4  "...I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic..."

I think Mr. Soros has fallen well within this range of the Army oath of enlistment. He is a enemy.
Posted by: DarthVader   2007-03-21 09:48  

#3  I already said, synagogue of satan.
Posted by: newc   2007-03-21 08:49  

#2  Someone needs to have a look at the early life of Soros.

He's suspect as hell.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles in Blairistan   2007-03-21 07:51  

#1  Riddle me this...

Why doesn't the United States have a mechanism in place by those who become naturalized citizens are reexamined as to their actions in regard to the beliefs they espoused to become citizens in the first place?

If the sum of your actions since being granted citizenship are to subvert the constitution and government of the United States there should be a way to revoke that citizenship and expel the offender.

Disgusting.
Posted by: DanNY   2007-03-21 07:45  

00:00