You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Iran ‘to try Britons for espionage’
2007-03-25
(Times) FIFTEEN British sailors and marines arrested by IranÂ’s Revolutionary Guards off the coast of Iraq may be charged with spying.

A website run by associates of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Iranian president, reported last night that the Britons would be put before a court and indicted.

Referring to them as “insurgents”, the site concluded: “If it is proven that they deliberately entered Iranian territory, they will be charged with espionage. If that is proven, they can expect a very serious penalty since according to Iranian law, espionage is one of the most serious offences.”

The warning followed claims by Iranian officials that the British navy personnel had been taken to Tehran, the capital, to explain their “aggressive action” in entering Iranian waters. British officials insist the servicemen were in Iraqi waters when they were held.
Related Links

* Iran raises the hostage stakes

* Keep up the pressure

* Hostage fears over servicemen seized by Iran

The penalty for espionage in Iran is death. However, similar accusations of spying were made when eight British servicemen were detained in the same area in 2004. They were paraded blindfolded on television but did not appear in court and were freed after three nights in detention.

Iranian student groups called yesterday for the 15 detainees to be held until US forces released five Revolutionary Guards captured in Iraq earlier this year.

Al-Sharq al-Awsat, a Saudi-owned newspaper based in London, quoted an Iranian military source as saying that the aim was to trade the Royal Marines and sailors for these Guards.

The claim was backed by other sources in Tehran. “As soon as the corps’s five members are released, the Britons can go home,” said one source close to the Guards.

He said the tactic had been approved by Ayatollah Khamenei, Iran’s supreme leader, who warned last week that Tehran would take “illegal actions” if necessary to maintain its right to develop a nuclear programme.

Iran denounced a tightening of sanctions which the United Nations security council was expected to agree last night in protest at TehranÂ’s insistence on enriching uranium that could be used for nuclear weapons.

Lord Triesman, the Foreign Office minister, met the Iranian ambassador in London yesterday to demand that consular staff be allowed access to the Britons, one of whom is a woman. His intervention came as a senior Iranian general alleged that the Britons had confessed under interrogation to “aggression into Iran’s waters”.

Intelligence sources said any advance order for the arrests was likely to have come from Major-General Yahya Rahim Safavi, the commander of the Revolutionary Guards.

Subhi Sadek, the Guards’ weekly newspaper, warned last weekend that the force had “the ability to capture a bunch of blue-eyed blond-haired officers and feed them to our fighting cocks”.

Safavi is known to be furious about the recent defections to the West of three senior Guards officers, including a general, and the effect of UN sanctions on his own finances.

A senior Iraqi officer appeared to back Tehran’s claim that the British had entered Iranian waters. “We were informed by Iraqi fishermen after they had returned from sea that there were British gunboats in an area that is out of Iraqi control,” said Brigadier-General Hakim Jassim, who is in charge of Iraq’s territorial waters. “We don’t know why they were there.”

Admiral Sir Alan West, the former head of the Royal Navy, dismissed suggestions that the British boats might have been in Iranian waters. West, who was first sea lord when the previous arrests took place in June 2004, said satellite tracking systems had shown then that the Iranians were lying and the same was certain to be true now.
Posted by:Ebbomong Cloting7438

#18  Where are the dreaded dolphins, pray tell? They're supposed to be awfully good at mines. ;-)
Posted by: trailing wife   2007-03-25 20:07  

#17  On the subject of a blockade - don't the Iranians have Sunburn anti-ship missiles? And if so, what defence do we have against them?
Posted by: Elmavith Sinatra5823   2007-03-25 17:53  

#16  Hey, folks. The Brits in their rubber-dub-dubbies were targets of opportunity. Iranians took 'em. The move is in the playbook. It was very succsssful in '79. By induction, do it again.

Ball is in Tony's court now. The US didn't set a very good example in the Embassy hostage thing. I hope that somebody on our side starts getting some good sense and a willingness to stop the MMs appropriately through a blockade with the threat of total annhilation.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2007-03-25 15:27  

#15  Iranian student groups called yesterday for the 15 detainees to be held until US forces released five Revolutionary Guards captured in Iraq earlier this year.

Bush must not let America be swayed by British interests in this situation. Somehow Britain must arrive at the conclusion that only military action will resolve this in a manner favorable to the West. Iran must not be allowed to constantly violate all international conventions without experiencing any actual consequences.

He said the tactic had been approved by Ayatollah Khamenei, Iran’s supreme leader, who warned last week that Tehran would take “illegal actions” if necessary to maintain its right to develop a nuclear programme.

Once again, when will the West take Ahmadinejad at his word. This fanatic has openly stated his intention to abuse every diplomatic form and negotiating tactic in the book. What further demonstration of bad faith is needed from this treacherous maggot?

Will we wait until Hizbullah detonates a nuclear device on American soil?

Only after Beslan in Brookline.

Should such a horrific day come, and our politicians certainly seem to be content with that prospect, our response, while non-nuclear, should be the destruction of whole cities in the MME (Muslim Middle East).

What is it that the West cannot bring itself to simply declare out loud that no further terrorist atrocities will be tolerated and that whole population centers will serve as reprisal targets for collective punishment of Islam's followers?

Dhimmitude is the epitome of collective punishment. We must find the moral fortitude to repay Islam in its own coin. Nothing less will gain their attention. Our continued boots-on-the-ground response to what is a broad international terrorist conspiracy remains laughable and Iran is laughing at us once again.

This is not a matter of typical Arab-style humiliation, although Iran will certainly play it that way. This is a matter of using the appropriate tools to obtain results that can only be gained through correct application of force. For all of our efforts, so far, we may as well be sending the Navy to fight a battle in Timbuktu.

Posted by: Zenster   2007-03-25 15:01  

#14  Introduce them to Ebola about 2 mins before releasing them in the Terhan airport.

Posted by: 3dc   2007-03-25 10:40  

#13  I wonder... does this escalation have anything to do with the recent House bug-out vote?
Posted by: mrp   2007-03-25 09:27  

#12  Make a deal. We will give them a nuke a day until the soldiers are released. We'll start with a nuke over your refineries.
Posted by: DarthVader   2007-03-25 09:18  

#11  The Russers took it seriously after Beslan, too. Then the attention span wore off.
Posted by: Fred   2007-03-25 08:54  

#10  When will the West take their words seriously and act in self-defense?

Only after Beslan in Brookline.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2007-03-25 08:08  

#9  After, Gladys, after.
Posted by: Bobby   2007-03-25 07:14  

#8  A sop to moonbats world wide.
Posted by: gromgoru   2007-03-25 05:52  

#7  I'm unclear on the timing of the latest events.

Did Ahmadinejad cancel his UN appearance before or after the abduction of the Brits?
Posted by: Gladys   2007-03-25 05:10  

#6  What we need to do now is make sure some bombs are emplaced in the Rev Guard leadships cars, snipe a few, take a fea wives and kids and send back ears and fingers.

Its like dealing with the mafia. Youhave to let them know you mean business.
Posted by: OldSpook   2007-03-25 04:37  

#5  "be held until US forces released five Revolutionary Guards captured in Iraq earlier this year."

OK. From 10,000 feet without a parachute, over the Amahdi'nejad's mansion
Posted by: OldSpook   2007-03-25 04:35  

#4  Iran has just crossed the line. Before this development it seemed likely that negotiations could have led to the return of the sailors - now this is blossoming into a potential military confrontation.

It was not that long ago that major Israeli operations were triggered by Iranian-backed Hezbollah's unprovoked attack and capture/abduction of several soldiers. Now Iran is repeating its use of this tactic.
Posted by: Grumenk Philalzabod0723   2007-03-25 03:52  

#3  The first treasonous kunt who calls these men "insurgents" in my presence is getting such a slap.
Posted by: Excalibur   2007-03-25 02:20  

#2  If Maggie was still in power she would give the Iranians exactly 24 hours to release the marines before eliminted the Iranian Navy. I wonder what Blair is planning?
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2007-03-25 00:52  

#1  The British soldiers wore uniforms. Hence according to Geneva Conventions they are BY DEFINITION not spies.

Expect loud, massive demonstrations across the West to denounce Iranian violations of the GC. Right?

Notwithstanding that aspect (and the lack of integrity on the part of leftist "human rights" groups in the West) all statements coming out of Iran in recent days are tantamount to a declaration of war.

When will the West take their words seriously and act in self-defense? are there no men left among Western leaders?
Posted by: Kalle (kafir forever)   2007-03-25 00:23  

00:00