You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
China has gained and tested array of space weapons
2007-03-31
China is developing an "impressive" array of space weapons, including missiles and jammers, and is moving toward placing nuclear weapons in space to attack U.S. satellites, the commander of U.S. strategic forces told the Senate yesterday.
The Chinese military has "undertaken what we would call a very disciplined and comprehensive continuum of capability against ... our space capabilities," Marine Corps Gen. James Cartwright yesterday told the Senate Armed Services strategic forces subcommittee.
Their capabilities go "all the way from temporary and reversible effects -- [Global Positioning System] jamming, things like that, [communications] jamming, all the way through direct ascent ASAT," he said, referring to anti-satellite weapons. "Eventually, they'll probably be looking at co-orbital" weapons -- missiles that orbit near a satellite and then explode.
"Then, the one that you really worry about is introducing weapons of mass destruction into space on a missile," he said.
The testimony provided the first details from the Bush administration about China's space-weapons program.
Subcommittee Chairman Bill Nelson, Florida Democrat, said that China is expected to have enough ASAT weapons by 2010 to "basically knock out most of our satellites in low-earth orbit."
Gen. Cartwright said countering that threat will require the military to develop "prompt global strike" weapons -- missiles and bombers that can hit targets around the world very rapidly.
China's across-the-board program of ground-based jamming and ground-launched missiles shows the arms program is sophisticated in terms of science and technology, he said. China's Jan. 11 ASAT test, when a missile destroyed a weather satellite in orbit, was not a surprise and was Beijing's third attempt to destroy an orbiting satellite with a missile.
"What was for us impressive was that in three attempts, they made significant changes each time and were able to, in three attempts, come to a successful intercept -- on their third attempt," he said.
Additionally, China already has deployed weapons at the lower end of the anti-satellite scale -- weapons that jam or disrupt satellites.
In his testimony, Gen. Cartwright questioned whether the Chinese space-arms program should lead the United States to develop similar weapons.
"We have the technical capability," he said. "My belief right now is knowing what we believe we know about this threat after the demonstrations that it is premature to start thinking about an arms race in space. ...We do not have to have a space response to that threat."
However, the four-star general said it would be "prudent" to improve the U.S. space-defense posture and improve surveillance and intelligence on space threats. Also, U.S. national security satellites should be hardened with "passive-type defenses," such as lens shutters or turn-off systems, he said.
Gen. Cartwright's comments yesterday contrast with his remarks in October, when he said reports China had fired a laser at a U.S. satellite in an apparent ASAT test were "uncertain." Gen. Cartwright, who is in charge of U.S. nuclear-warfighting forces, also suggested the United States might choose to use nuclear missiles to stop a country such as China from using missiles fired from hard-to-reach interior bases to destroy U.S. satellites.
"If there are many targets that are out of the reach of our bombers, conventional forces ... in large countries, the question would be, as an example, how many satellites would we be willing to lose before we went to a nuclear alternative, because the only thing we have to reach those targets is nuclear," he said.
Posted by:Dave D.

#6  I think China is going to be in for a rude, rude surprise if they try any of this sh$$. The US military has capabilities we don't talk about, even among ourselves. China is trying to bite off something that will leave a VERY nasty taste in the dragon's mouth, probably for thousands of years.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2007-03-31 19:55  

#5   "If our pilots are ever in a Fair Fight, we haven't done our job."

Hot damn! Get 'em dawg!
Posted by: Shipman   2007-03-31 13:52  

#4  If the 'Rats in Congress approve anything at all, it will be a porkfest.

But, the major contractors themselves have better motives. I know that we really do want to help the warfighters. We host them several times a year and tell us how the products work and what they like and don't like. We really listen to them, too, and make improvements based on their input. A saying is "If our pilots are ever in a Fair Fight, we haven't done our job."

Granted, we want to get paid and make a profit off the work, but most (not all, but most) are patriots and want to create the best product possible. I remember putting in OT to get some product out the door just after 9/11 and before Afghanistan. They actually had a surfeit of volunteers (we weren't allowed to sign the weapons, though). Yes, we get paid more than the soldiers and work less dangerous conditions, but compare us to the people in the coffeehouses who bitch and gripe, yet contribute nothing themselves. (I can't say that about RB because so many people here were, or are, actual soldiers.)

Yes, there are cases of fraud and waste. But, compare it to any other government operation (say, Education) and you'll find we are models of honesty and efficiency.
Posted by: Jackal   2007-03-31 13:25  

#3  XieXie Clinton ZongTong!
Posted by: Danking70   2007-03-31 13:00  

#2  Yup, it's actually quite easy and cheap (comparitively) to knock out all our satellites. It's what I'd do if I were the enemy. We're helpless without all our space-based aids. Oh, sure, they haven't given up on the paper chart, but then we go back to an earlier age of capability.

And any "let's develop new space defenses" activity is just going to be yet another excuse for the defense contractors to raid the U.S. treasury.
Posted by: gromky   2007-03-31 05:14  

#1  see also LUCIANNE > RAND > CHINA CAN DEFEAT THE USA > over TAIWAN via ANTI-ACCESS/DENIAL strategies in case of naval conflict. IMO still comes down to Taiwan being overwelmed vv massive conventional first-strike, espec by asymmetric Airborne-Commando forces, wid China willing to ignore/absorb heavy casualties. Chinese redeployment of mil assets near HAINAN ISLAND + VIETNAM > PUTS THE PLA ON ONE [ROUGH]GENERAL STRATEGIC DIRECTION to overwhelm = control several Nations in one strike + enter WestPac-CentPac. WAFF POSTER > it is in China's interest in any US-Sino war over Taiwan to seek mil control of SUBIC BAY [PI Freeport], former CLARK AFB, and MANILA BAY, besides WESTPAC espec GUAM-Micronesia. We already know about the HAWAIIAN ISLANDS also.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2007-03-31 00:47  

00:00