You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa Horn
AFRICOM won't get new resources: Pentagon
2007-04-24
Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at PhotobucketThe creation of a new quasi-military command for Africa will not boost U.S. troops or resources for the continent, a senior official said. "They shouldn't look at this like, 'Here's another donor, here's another source of revenue,'" said Principal Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Ryan Henry at a Pentagon press conference Monday.

U.S. Africa Command, or AFRICOM, will be operational by September 2007, although its headquarters location has still not been determined. It will be based in Africa, but will likely have a small staff, with just over half military personnel. The remaining staff will be State Department and other government agency representatives who together will comprise a new kind of military combatant command -- not to plan and wage wars, but to train foreign militaries, help them coordinate their activities across country lines, and coordinate U.S. government diplomatic, humanitarian and military efforts with individual nations.

Unlike other regional commands, AFRICOM's deputy commander will be a civilian from the State Department. "We are looking at a different mission set for AFRICOM," Henry said. Its principal mission is security cooperation, Henry said. "It will not be in warfighting."

Henry denied that the creation of AFRICOM was a response to growing Chinese business and government involvement in Africa, expanding terrorist activity or Africa's known oil reserves and other natural resources. AFRICOM should be operating as a sub-unified command by September 2007, with full capabilities in September 2008, the U.S. official said.

Henry's comments highlighted the increasing concern that U.S. policymakers have towards the spread of extreme Islamism and other destabilizing forces in sub-Saharan Africa.
Posted by:Anonymoose

#2  Lest we fergit, various NET NEWS sites [e.g. ASIA TIMES/WORLDNEWS], in past and present, continue to have articles denoting the new geopol and trade relationships between RUSSIA, CHINA, and INDIA [plus several smaller nations], and its challenge = threat to both the USA + West. RUSSIA + CHINA have no qualms about adding AFRICA + CENTRAL-SOUTH AMERICAS, etal. to their anti-US/Western list. 9-11/WOT > WAR FOR THE WORLD + WAR FOR OWG-SWO + WAR AGZ USA/WAR FOR ANTI-US + WAR FOR ANTI-DEMOCRACY, etc. .............. + WAR TO THE DEATH, even it seemingly does not appear to be so. *Lest we fergit Part Deux, PRAVDA/
WORLDTRIBUNE > RUSSIAN GENERAL > WAR AGZ AMERICA BY YEAR 2015 [NOT counting other articles or sources denoting 2014-2020 +/-].
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2007-04-24 22:00  

#1  Just a note that the military operates with a manpower ceiling determined by Congress who for all their whining about 'not enough' soldiers haven't seen fit to do more than a temporary increase of about a division strength. Further command billets and flag officer positions are also limited in number by Congress. So any new formations or organizations in the DoD side of the house must be taken from some other resources. Looks like the Pentagon has determined that uniform manpower isn't there to play diplo games anymore. It doesn't mean that another Headquarters element doesn't have designated responsibility for planning and coordinating potential ops on the continent. Some part of the world is in some command's mission statement somewhere.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2007-04-24 08:52  

00:00