You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
'NATO risks losing Afghan war'
2007-04-29

NATO risks losing the war in Afghanistan because of a “tremendous deterioration” in the popularity of the government of US-backed President Hamid Karzai, former US ambassador to the United Nations Richard Holbrooke said on Saturday. “Afghanistan represents the ultimate test for NATO,” Holbrooke, who recently toured the war-torn country, told the Brussels Forum, an annual transatlantic security conference. Holbrooke said he was struck during his visit by how unpopular Karzai’s government had become because of corruption caused by the country’s burgeoning drug problem. “I have heard increasingly that the government has lost its momentum,” he said. “I can sense a tremendous deterioration in the standing of the government. Afghans are now universally talking about their disappointment with Karzai. Let’s be honest with ourselves ... the government must succeed or else the Taliban will gain from it.”

At a news conference later, Canadian Foreign Minister Peter Mackay said the fate of the allied operation in Afghanistan - in which 54 Canadian soldiers have died so far - hangs by a thread. “While I don’t want to sound alarmist, I think there is going to be a tipping point unless we are able to stabilise (southern Afghanistan, especially), unless we are able to get on with” building the economy, rule of law and government institutions.

He said Canada had been disappointed by a lack of solidarity within NATO to share the burden of the Afghan operation. He also called on Pakistan to do more to secure its border with Afghanistan saying there were as many as 4 million refugees “just inside the Pakistani border and they are a source for recruitment” for Taliban guerrillas.

NATO Secretary General, Jaap de Hoop Scheffer added: “If we lose ... the consequences will be felt not only in Afghanistan but in all nations.” Holbrooke, who was instrumental in formulating US policy toward the United Nations, Africa, Asia and the Middle East, remains best-known for his role as the architect of the 1995 Dayton Peace Agreement which ended the war in Bosnia. Some have mentioned him as the next US secretary of state if a Democratic candidate wins the next presidential election. “We don’t want to see the kind of political chaos (in Kabul) that in Baghdad is destroying the coalition effort,” he said.
Posted by:Fred

#5  seems like the the war has pretty much been won just wrapping things up now
Posted by: sinse   2007-04-29 14:17  

#4  BS. Nato is the United States, period. Nothing gets done there unless we are doing the lifting. We do the plans, the strategy, the tactics, the equipment, the forces, et.al. Holbrooke is a weanie and always has been one. How could someone from the Clinton administration have any reference point to conflict, victory, etc.
Posted by: Jack is Back!   2007-04-29 12:30  

#3  Holbrooke wanted to be John Kerry's Secretary of State and was on his team. It should make anyone shudder to think of the utter chaos and genocide that would exist in such a circumstance. That is, utter dhimmitude and surrender.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2007-04-29 10:14  

#2  Holbrooke is Clinton's bitch. Seriously, “I have heard increasingly that the government has lost its momentum,” he said. “I can sense a tremendous deterioration in the standing of the government."? From whom did you hear this? What spider-sense set this off? A virtual sponge of info ensconsed comfortably in NY and his euro- apartment....
Posted by: Frank G   2007-04-29 06:51  

#1  NATO is still around? The west is no longer capable of waging war.
Posted by: JerseyMike   2007-04-29 06:32  

00:00