You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
House Rejects Nine-Month Iraq Withdrawal
2007-05-11
WASHINGTON (AP) - The Democratic-controlled House defeated legislation Thursday to require the withdrawal of U.S. combat troops from Iraq within nine months, then pivoted quickly to a fresh challenge of President Bush's handling of the unpopular war.

The vote on the nine-month withdrawal measure was 255-171. The bill drew the support of 169 Democrats and two Republicans. There were 59 Democrats and 196 Republicans opposed.
I'm surprised about the 59 Democrats. Are the Blue Dogs sending a message?
On a day of complex maneuvering, Democrats said they would approve legislation funding the war on an installment plan, and Bush said he would veto it. But the president, under pressure from lawmakers in both parties, coupled his threat with an offer to accept a spending bill that sets out standards for the Iraqi government to meet. "Time's running out, because the longer we wait the more strain we're going to put on the military," said Bush, who previously had insisted on what he termed a "clean" war funding bill.

Bush's critics in Congress treated his willingness to apply benchmarks to the Iraqis as a concession, but said they wanted more. "Democrats are not going to give the president a blank check for a war without end," said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California. To buttress her point, Democrats advanced legislation for a vote later in the evening providing funds for the war grudgingly, in two installments. The first portion would cover costs until Aug. 1 - $42.8 billion to buy equipment and train Iraqi and Afghan security forces.

Under the bill, it would take a summertime vote by Congress to free an additional $52.8 billion, the money needed to cover costs through the Sept. 30 end of the fiscal year. "We reject that idea. It won't work," the president declared after a meeting with military leaders at the Pentagon.

Democratic officials, speaking privately, said Pelosi had agreed to allow the vote on the withdrawal measure in the hope that her rank-and-file would then unite behind the funding bill. But in an increasingly complex political environment, even that measure was deemed to be dead on arrival in the Senate, where Democrats hold a narrow advantage and the rules give Republicans leverage to block legislation.
Posted by:Steve White

#6  Texas and Tennessee Republicans voted for this?!?
They sound like real team players.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2007-05-11 17:01  

#5  My Blue Boy Boyd voted correctly.

Guns, Defense spending and Ag Subsidies, the third rails for blue dawgs.
Posted by: Shipman   2007-05-11 13:37  

#4  HR 2237 Roll Call Results

Looks like "Ron Paul (R - TX)" and "John J. Duncan, Jr. (R - TN)"
Posted by: Mullah Richard   2007-05-11 11:14  

#3  Anyone know who the 2 Republicans were?
Might save me some time looking it up.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2007-05-11 10:28  

#2  Errr...the Blue Dogs get an earful during the Spring Break? I'm sure the moonbats will offer up their Lamonts to show the real stand on the war by the electorate. Didn't float too well in Connecticut. Could start a new pool of 'independents'. 50 or so would be a good start. That'll help the Donks. Money, tv spin time, and emotion versus real seats. Tough choice.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2007-05-11 10:12  

#1  WND > TERRORISTS FORM A WESTERN BASE. Tri-Border/Frontier area [Brazil-Paraquay-Argentina]of South America. MUSLIM CAB DRIVER quote > "Iff Bush attacks Iran, IN TWO MINUTES HE WILL BE DEAD". Move along , boyz, clearly no "Terrorists in America's backyard" here, ala FORT DIX.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2007-05-11 00:14  

00:00