You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
‘I Didn't Have an Answer'
2007-05-11
New York Sun Editorial
May 11, 2007

When we clicked yesterday morning on the Drudge Report's headline "Republican Congressmen Take It To Bush," it took us to a story in the New York Times about how Republican moderates had gone to warn President Bush that their support for the war was faltering. The Times quoted Congressman LaHood of Illinois as saying, "It was a tough meeting in terms of people being as frank as they possibly could about their districts and their feelings about where the American people are on the war."

At that, we reached for Lloyd Wendt's history of the Chicago Tribune, which begins with a chapter about what could have been called the Civil War Surge. It tells of an encounter, in 1865, between the young editor of the Tribune, Joseph Medill, and President Lincoln, the Illinois lawyer the Tribune had, to oversimplify the story a bit, essentially assigned to go down to Washington to run the country. "Some observers went even further," Mr. Wendt writes, "asserting that the Tribune had started the war, a compliment the proprietors were disinclined to accept."

The encounter Mr. Wendt describes between Medill and Lincoln started when a delegation comprising Medill and two other Chicagoans had gone to the war department to try to get Secretary Stanton to back off from drafting more men from Cook County. An angry Stanton rebuffed them, and they'd gone over his head, to the White House, and met with Lincoln in his office. Lincoln wouldn't back off, either; a dozen states were trying to get out of draft calls. But Lincoln agreed to walk back over to Stanton's office and "hear the argument on both sides."

"The War Department's blue-uniformed sentries came rigidly to attention as the president appeared," Mr. Wendt writes. Lincoln, he says, gave them a friendly "at ease" and led his visitors through the "chattering telegraph operations room," where he knew everyone by name, to Stanton's "vast cave of maps and charts," where Stanton glowered beneath dark oil paintings of Generals Knox and Dearborn. Stanton was none too pleased to see the same Chicagoans whom he'd shooed out of his office earlier in the day return with his boss. Medill made a game effort, reading from his own newspaper about how no other congressional district had put so many men into the war.

For months, Mr. Wendt explains, the Tribune had "acknowledged to its readers that after four years of the most brutal fighting known to man, even greater sacrifices would be required. The armies were devouring men on a scale not known before in military history, as new weapons outmarched generals' old tactics." Draft riots ensued, particularly in New York. The Tribune required an entire supplemental page, Mr. Wendt notes, just to list Illinois casualties among the more than 13,000 suffered by the Union at Shiloh.

When Medill finished his plea, Stanton nodded to his provost marshal, General Fry, who "read the sanguinary statistics of four years of fighting in a loud, sonorous voice," while Lincoln listened with his head bowed. Stanton then rejected the plea, saying, as Mr. Wendt paraphrases it, that there could be no city nor section nor state asking for special favor, not even Illinois. Medill left the meeting pledging to remain silent about it until the war ended. It would be 30 years before he could bring himself to write the account that Mr. Wendt quotes at some length.

"I shall never forget," Medill said of Lincoln, "how he suddenly lifted his head and turned on us a black and frowning face. ‘Gentlemen,' he said, in a voice full of bitterness, ‘after Boston, Chicago has been the chief instrument in bringing this war on the country. The Northwest has opposed the South as New England has opposed the South. It is you who are largely responsible for making blood flow as it has. You called for war until we had it. You called for Emancipation, and I have given it to you. … Now you come here begging to be let off from the call for men which I have made to carry out the war you have demanded. You ought to be ashamed of yourselves. … Go home, and raise your 6,000 extra men."

Then, in Medill's own account, Lincoln turned on the great editor. "‘And you, Medill, you are acting like a coward. You and your Tribune have had more influence than any [other] paper in the Northwest in making this war. You can influence great masses, and yet you cry to be spared at a moment when your cause is suffering. Go home and send us those men.'" Wrote Medill: "I couldn't say anything. It was the first time I ever was whipped, and I didn't have an answer. …"

***

That was how The Great Emancipator turned the tables on the Republicans who had gone weak-kneed in the middle of a war. Chicago did meet its draft call, sending, by Mr. Wendt's count, nearly a fifth of its population into the struggle for the Union. For nearly three decades, we have carried in our wallet a dog-eared passage of Medill's confession to share with aspiring young editors. There are those who will say that the circumstances are different today. But by our lights, it doesn't matter whether the pleaders are newspaper editors or congressmen. It is Bush who is in Lincoln's boots. The rest of the country knows in its heart the honorable course, which history will remember for generations after the encounters now taking place.
Posted by:Glaviger Creater9283

#8  FOTSGreg, I do write sometimes, and call sometimes. But my style works in this forum because so many here reason primarily on facts, not wishes. My best value outside this forum is talking to my children and their friends... and carefully with people in my circle. Both trailing daughters are persuaded that the Democrats are the party of stupid reactionaries and willfully blind pseudointellectuals, whereas the Republicans are where the truly intelligent and innovative put their vote. Both have spoken up in their circle and at school about the War on Terror, etc. And both, when they have time or hear me giggle, come look over my shoulder to read the latest at Rantburg (TD #1 saved Rantburg: The Movie to her favourites on her laptop). They've even been known to get homework help here on occasion. ;-)

You, my dear, and so many others here, are suited to make waves in the world. I'm more a pebble, hoping that my ripples spread wide across my little pond.
Posted by: trailing wife   2007-05-11 21:39  

#7  An aside about Secretary Stanton. Other than being a superb Secretary of War, Stanton made a decision that is influential even today.

Ironically, for the wrong reason.

He directed that every War Department record, and every record that passed through the War Department, be kept on file in perpetuity. In addition, he ordered that every single Confederate record captured by the Union army be carefully preserved in the archive.

He assumed that at the end of the Civil War, there was going to be litigation the likes of which was unimaginable. Lawsuits about the war running the length and breadth of the nation for 50 years.

Fortunately, as we know today, that did not happen. But such was the high esteem that Stanton was held that those records still exist today, and in amazing detail.

Listed are most of the names of the men who fought in the war, a treasure trove for genealogists matched only today with the Internet. Other historical data also abounds concerning commerce, technology, general history, war history, and statistics.

It was the first great snapshot of an entire nation, at the birth of the modern age. All due to a fear that the destruction of the war would be redoubled by lawyers.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2007-05-11 20:37  

#6  the fact that LaHood, et al - notified Tim Russert (D-NBC) of their tongue-lashing of Bush shows that it was nothing more than a cowardly public act of ass-covering - they deserve to be replaced by suitable REPUBLICANS in the next election. F&CKERS
Posted by: Frank G   2007-05-11 18:57  

#5  FOTSGreg:TW, don't wish it - do it.

Without my suggesting anything, but filling his head with my rantsopinions, my fifteen-year-old son is doing just that at school. He makes a point to speak up and argue when teachers start spewing their PC indoctrination, whether global warming, "racism" or the WoT. He gets the teachers so flustered all they can do is appeal to their authority or accuse him of changing the subject or going off on tangents, when they raised the issue int the first place. He recently did a speech (assignment: be persuasive, but include documented facts). He chose to highlight progress in the war, using centcom.mil as his primary source. We don't know what grade he got yet, but he got plenty of eye rolling and condescending sneers for his efforts - especially when he quoted Bush. He seems to take pride in that kind of reaction, though.

I'm so proud!
Posted by: xbalanke   2007-05-11 18:12  

#4  Also remember - a single voice can be lost in the din of the mob, but a thousand voices can drown out the mob and get their message heard.

Be one of those thousand voices.

Posted by: FOTSGreg   2007-05-11 17:35  

#3  TW, don't wish it - do it.

I've seen your writing and it's eloquent when you want it to be.

That's the problem with to many people - they see the problem, but don't think they're smart enough, eloquent enough, or guilty enough to do what they know they need to do.

Write your congresscritters. They may not listen, but they'll damn well know somebody spoke up.

Write your newspapers. They will listen and if they get enough letters to the editor they virtually have to print some of them on our side (they will print opposing viewpoints, but that's only to be expected and it's also the right thing for them to do).

Write the pollsters - tell them they don't speak for you when they poll 50% more Democrats in a poll than they do Republicans and they do it intentionally. Public pressure will work on them too.

Write your blogs and bloggers. Stand up to the Kos kiddies and the MoveOn.org morons. Support groups like Move America Forward. Let people know where you stand.

Write the news agencies - ABC, NBC, CBS, MSNBC, CNN, Fox and others need to know what the American heartland thinks more than anything else. Fox practically begs for watchers to write them. Do it. If they face enough public pressure, they must concede to it.

Finally, become a force to be reckoned with in your own communities. Write, distribute free newsletters, find a way to get your voice heard, print flyers, do anything you can - there's enough trash on telephone poles and bulletin boards that any voice of rationality, loyalty, patriotism, and more might just draw attention.

Organize. Without organization we stand idly by as the enemy takes us over and robs us of our freedoms.

Remember, those who will concede liberty for security deserve neither (Thomas Jefferson).

Posted by: FOTSGreg   2007-05-11 17:34  

#2  Today Medill would return to his office and write an editorial accusing Lincoln of hate speech, war mongering, and raising the "chill wind" of "supression of dissent".
Posted by: tu3031   2007-05-11 13:34  

#1  Wow. If I could write like that...
Posted by: trailing wife   2007-05-11 12:02  

00:00