You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
International-UN-NGOs
Zimbabwe to chair major UN body
2007-05-13
Zimbabwe has been elected to head the UN's commission on Sustainable Development (CSD) despite strong objections from Western diplomats.
We're talking audible eye-rolling.
They had said Zimbabwe was unsuitable because of its human rights record and economic problems. It is suffering food shortages and rampant inflation.
Not to mention the fact that Zim hasn't been able to develop anything since Bob took over, much less sustain it.
But Zimbabwe has dismissed such criticism, calling it an insult.
"We're just so insulted!"
"Ah, go sustain something!"

The country was chosen by other African nations.
Really? Who'da guessed that?
The CSD post rotates every year between the world's regions.
I'm waiting to see who gets voted in when it's Antarctica's turn.
Zimbabwe was elected to lead the commission by a 26-21 secret ballot among CSD members at the UN headquarters in New York. There were also three abstentions. There was a brief round of applause as the result was announced.
"Hurray! Zim's gonna sustain the UN's development into a laughingstock!"
Developing nations appear to have voted for Zimbabwe, the BBC's Laura Trevelyan in New York says. They respected the decision of the African group to nominate the country for the post in the first place, and they have shown they cannot be pushed around, our correspondent says.
"Yeah! Ain't nobuddy pushes us around!"
"That's how we can tell you're impoverished, weak, ineffectual, and 'developing.' Only civilized countries get pushed around anymore."

Zimbabwe's Environment Minister Francis Nheme will now become chairman of the CSD.
Luckily the body doesn't actually produce anything except salaries for its staff.
Mr Nheme is the subject of European Union travel ban because he is a member of President Robert Mugabe's government. That means he cannot travel to the EU to meet ministers on commission business.
Guess he's gonna have to teleconference, huh?
Zimbabwe's Ambassador to the UN, Boniface Chidyausiku, said before the vote that his country was entitled to hold the chairmanship. "It's our right.
"Yeah! It's our Legitimate Right™!"
We're members of the United Nations and we're members of CSD, and the Africa group did make a decision and endorsed Zimbabwe," he told the BBC's Network Africa programme. He said the real objection came down to Britain's criticism of Zimbabwe's controversial land reform programme.
That and the fact that Zim's actually becoming undeveloped, and maybe sustainably so.
Zimbabwe was once a prosperous food exporter, but production has plummeted since land reforms in 2000 that saw thousands of white-owned farms seized. "We see it as a translation of a bilateral quarrel between London and Harare on the land reform programme," Mr Chidyausiku said.
The rest of the world sees it as the loons taking over the administration of the cackle factory.
He said the European countries should respect the decision of the African block. "When they tell the African group to change, it's an insult to our intelligence - that we Africans can't think," he said.
Posted by:Fred

#10  It's stupidity like this that makes savvy investors think there isn't a country in Africa worth investing fifty cents in. It's also one of the major reasons the African continent, as a whole, plays a lesser part in world trade in 2007 than it did in 1960. And it didn't play a real big part then. If Africa suddenly disappeared under the waves tomorrow, the world economy would barely notice.
Posted by: Mac   2007-05-13 18:22  

#9  Y'all are all wrong, Zimbob has found something to steal, that's all.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2007-05-13 12:48  

#8  Besoeker nails it.
Posted by: anonymous5089   2007-05-13 10:17  

#7  There was a brief round of applause as the result was announced.

That wasn't applause. That was the sound of collective heads banging against the table in disbelief from the members of developed countries.
Posted by: Thinemp Whimble   2007-05-13 10:02  

#6  He said the real objection came down to Britain's criticism of Zimbabwe's controversial land reform programme.

The key or bottom line is not the UK's "real objection" but the in-yo-face response to a western notions of white land and farm ownership in an African nation. How dare the west poke a finger at Afrian tribal land reform and redistribution?
Posted by: Besoeker   2007-05-13 09:16  

#5  Oh, well, it's just the african countries regional voting bloc (as UN members vote according to their affiliation, not as free-minded State-members) sticking it to whitey, just like the arabs did for darfur. But that won't prevent them for asking for having their debt cancelled, or for more aid money, of course. I mean, it's working fine for them that way, why should they ever change?
Posted by: anonymous5089   2007-05-13 04:18  

#4  What sort of "last comment" need apply? Everything in the entire article is an outrage. But who's counting?
Posted by: Zenster   2007-05-13 03:59  

#3  Zimbabwe has been elected to head the UN's commission on Sustainable Development (CSD) despite an economy so bad that their citizens beg visiting Ethiopians for pocket change.

Conclusive proof of the worthlessness of the U.N.
Posted by: Fliter Munster4929   2007-05-13 03:56  

#2  A masterpiece, Fred.

Everybody, just sit back, sip that good wine or cold beer or whatever, and try to fully appreciate this whole story, and especially that last quote.
Posted by: Verlaine   2007-05-13 02:40  

#1  Yeah, right. The UN Commission on Sustainable Development is supposed to be involved in worldwide activities, not just African.

I see this simply as a way for this particular bloc of nations, and ZimBob in particular, to siphon off funds from us evil colonialists.

Posted by: FOTSGreg   2007-05-13 02:10  

00:00