You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
White House rejects Democrats' offer on war spending bill
2007-05-19
(Xinhua) -- Democratic leaders in the U.S. Congress offered major concessions on Friday over a war spending bill that would provide money for the Iraq war, but the offers were rejected by the White House. After a close-door meeting with top White House aides on Capital Hill, Democratic leaders said the White House said "no" to everything they proposed. "To say I was disappointed in the meeting is an understatement," said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, a Democrat from Nevada.

Democratic leaders offered to strip from a war spending bill billions of U.S. dollars in domestic spending that was opposed by President George W. Bush, if the White House agreed to a withdrawal timetable in the bill. They also offered to give the president authority to waiver compliance with a timetable to pull out U.S. troops out of Iraq. But the offers were declined by the White House, and no agreement emerged.

White House chief of staff Joshua Bolten, who rejected the deal at the meeting, said any timetable would send the wrong signal to the enemies of the United States. "Whether waivable or not, timelines send exactly the wrong signal to our adversaries, to our allies and, most importantly, to the troops in the field," he said. Even without agreement with the White House, Democrats said they would try to pass a bill next week to provide funding to U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. But House Speaker Nancy Pelosi did not rule out the bill would contain a withdrawal timetable. "Nothing is off the table. The one thing that has to be on the table is accountability and this administration has never been willing to be accountable for this war in Iraq," she said.
Posted by:Fred

#6  FTB, bobby...
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2007-05-19 23:19  

#5  If Queen Nancy is accountable, as she says W is not, why will she not accept e-mails from anybody other than her district in California?

Harry does. Turban Durbin does. Bush does.

Why not Queen Nancy?

SHE'S NOT ACCOUNTABLE!

Apologies to Joe.
Posted by: Bobby   2007-05-19 18:07  

#4  "To say I was disappointed in the meeting is an understatement," said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, a Democrat from Nevada.

I imagine ol'Harry emerging from this meeting drenched in flop sweat and Pelosi blinkin' through the Botox an SOS in morse code. Hoist these bastards on their own petard, W.
Posted by: regular joe   2007-05-19 13:00  

#3  The Democrats didn't expext W to hold out this long, and it panics them. There will be a spending bill without a timetable before July 4th -- it's just a matter of the Democrats' finding a way to make it look like a victory. Nice to see W still has some fight left.
Posted by: Jonathan   2007-05-19 11:21  

#2  they keep beating this dead horse to try and satisfy their nutroots. Bush has the public behind him and Harry and Nancy'll eventually give in. I can't wait for the whackos to turn on the Donks....heh heh
Posted by: Frank G   2007-05-19 08:33  

#1  Harry & Nancy sent packing with their tails between their legs ? That does it. Now their dander is up.
Posted by: Woozle Elmeter2970   2007-05-19 01:01  

00:00