You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa Horn
Egeland: China must do more on Darfur
2007-05-23
May 22, 2007 (NEW YORK) — China must do more to stop the Darfur conflict in Sudan, said former U.N. aid chief Jan Egeland, while the United States should focus on trying to build peace between the Palestinians and Israel. Egeland, now a special adviser to U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, also said he spent too much time in Washington instead of Beijing as he tried to draw attention to Darfur while he was U.N. emergency relief coordinator.
Call the Chicoms "stingy", Jan. I double-dog dare ya.
"Darfur — I don’t think the United States can unlock. In the Palestinian conflict I think they can," he told the Council on Foreign Relations in New York on Tuesday. "The U.S. and the U.K. did all the right things on Darfur and it had little effect. We should have had a wider coalition in the beginning and I blame myself for not going to Beijing more and less to Congress."
"The Merkins bow and scrape. The heathen Chinee just stare at me inscrutably. Of course I like going to New York and London!"
He said public campaigns for action should have earlier targeted countries who invest in Darfur, like China and India, to push them to pressure Sudan to resolve the four-year-old conflict in Darfur. The U.N. Security Council last year adopted a resolution to deploy a "hybrid" U.N.-African Union force of more than 20,000. But Sudanese President Omar Hassan al-Bashir has only agreed to the deployment of 3,000 U.N. police and military personnel to aid the African Union force of about 7,000.

Egeland said when China began to pressure the Sudanese government in 2006, it was too late, saying: "It is much more difficult to roll back a tremendous war rather than stop it from brewing." He also said the Group of Eight — the United States, Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and Russia — were failing in a promise to boost aid to poor countries. The G8 pledged in 2005 to double aid by 2010.
Posted by:Pappy

#1  Uh, China is up to its earlobes in causing the Darfur Devastation. As each new oil field is discovered there, the militia and irregular army forces are sent in to clear out and/or subdue the locals, and then the Chinese and Malaysian oil firms move in and begin drilling. The locals may get tiny amounts of spinoff for a while, but basically they're just in the way.

The oil is trucked to be offshored or refined in isolated new Chinese refineries in the north.

So, just what was it Egeland wanted the Chinese to do?
Posted by: Brian H   2007-05-23 04:45  

00:00