You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
The Democrats Blink
2007-05-23
When Democratic leaders dropped their demand for a withdrawal timeline this week, it was more than being outmaneuvered in negotiations. They left the president in firm possession of the moral high ground.

Only a short time ago, Democrats were cockily promising they would send the president a pullout bill as many times as it would take, until finally he would have to relent. Just last Friday, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi were insisting on a timeline in negotiations with the White House on a war funding bull.

But the tables have now been turned on congressional Democrats. All of a sudden, it is they who face a deadline: If Congress does not manage to pass a war spending bill that the president is willing to sign before the Memorial Day recess, Democrats become vulnerable to the charge of refusing to fund our combat troops.

And so, faced with the president's famous "stubbornness" (so often portrayed as a character flaw by liberal Democrats and the media establishment), Democratic leaders have been forced to blink, dropping their insistence that war funding be linked to a troop withdrawal timeline — even a nonbinding one.

Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards and others who pander to the party's liberal base are blasting the Pelosi-Reid cave- in. "Congress should send the same bill back to him again and again until he realizes he has no choice but to start bringing our troops home," Edwards said in a statement.

Democrats now have plans for a bill amenable to the president that would fund our forces in Iraq and Afghanistan up to the end of the fiscal year, a little more than four months from now. A minimum wage increase is likely to be included in the legislation.

This loss of nerve on the part of Reid and Pelosi amounts to a significant blow to Democrats for at least two reasons:

• Disunity in the Democrats' ranks. After portraying the congressional elections that brought them into power last year as a referendum on the Iraq War, those in charge of the new Democratic Congress cannot deliver a withdrawal, and have no stomach for repeated presidential vetoes of their funding cut-off bills.

Consequently, many of the 73 Democratic House members who make up California Rep. Maxine Waters' Out of Iraq Caucus have already begun to revolt against the Democratic leadership, announcing they will not vote for a bill not containing a deadline.

Rep. Lynn Woolsey, also from California and a caucus co-founder, warned that "This is a Republican bill, so it better be Republican votes that pass it."

Hard-core war opponents in Congress may soon be heard attacking Democratic leaders as much as they do the White House.

• Defeat is not a winning issue. Confronted with a president who will not back down in his support for victory in Iraq, it is now obvious the Democrats who run Congress are afraid to take him on toe-to-toe.

For all their rhetoric during last year's campaign about it being the will of the American people to cut and run, Pelosi and Reid were unwilling to make an explicit attempt to use Congress' power of the purse to follow through on their promises.

With Congress' poll ratings falling below 30% and registering lower than President Bush's, Pelosi and Reid may doubt the American public would be with them in trying to force a pullout.

It leaves the president looking committed and determined in his beliefs, while congressional leaders appear afraid to stand behind their own policies. Meanwhile, the liberal rank and file grow increasingly restless.

If nothing else, Pelosi's and Reid's concession gives Bush some political breathing space as America races against time to win in Iraq.
Posted by:ryuge

#5  Ya Barb, I know it's a stretch.
Posted by: 49 Pan   2007-05-23 17:16  

#4  You're assuming they have souls, Pan.

That's mighty optimistic of you....
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2007-05-23 14:09  

#3  Democracy is such a fragile thing and these idiots are taking for granted that they can toy with our nation in an all or nothing manner. The fabric of democracy is like rice paper, not dragon skin, and trampling on it will damage it forever. Reid, Pelosie, and Murtha have the potential to tear this nation apart if they trigger the right events. All three need to take a hard look into their souls to see where they are taking this country.
Posted by: 49 Pan   2007-05-23 12:38  

#2  Investors Business Daily has a wonderful editorial department, in its own way as good as that of the Wall Street Journal, I believe. And a readership desirable beyond mere advertising eyeballs...
Posted by: trailing wife   2007-05-23 08:58  

#1  . . . many of the 73 Democratic House members who make up California Rep. Maxine Waters' I [heart] Osama! Out of Iraq Caucus have already begun to revolt against the Democratic leadership, announcing they will not vote for a bill not containing a deadline. . . . Hard-core war opponents in Congress may soon be heard attacking Democratic leaders as much as they do the White House.

The Dems have shown remarkable ability to hold their noses and do what they need to hold power tactical discipline, but there's a simmering tension between the moonbats (Kos/DU) and the governing elite (Harry/Nancy) that could explode into fratricide. I hope it does, anyway. Red-on-red is always such fun to watch.
Posted by: Mike   2007-05-23 08:33  

00:00