You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Signs, Portents, and the Weather-
Oxfam to U.S.: Pay Half of Global Warming Tab
2007-05-30
HT: FrontPageMagazine.com
Coping with the ravages of global warming will cost $50 billion a year, and the rich nations who caused most of the pollution must pay most of the bill, aid agency Oxfam said on Tuesday. The call, barely 10 days before a crucial Group of Eight (G8) summit in Germany which has climate change at its core, is likely to make already tense negotiations even tougher.

The United States, which Oxfam says must foot 44 percent of the annual $50 billion bill, is rejecting attempts by German G8 presidency Germany to set stiff targets and timetables for cutting carbon gas emissions and raising energy efficiency.
Hmmmm, no.
"G8 countries face two obligations as they prepare for this year's summit in Germany - to stop harming by cutting their emissions to keep global warming below two degrees Celsius and to start helping poor countries to cope," said Oxfam researcher Kate Raworth. "Developing countries cannot and should not be expected to foot the bill for the impact of rich countries' emissions," she said, echoing the position of the developing world.
We might help out some, but we're not going to give any money to the Oxfam types.
Some Scientists with an agenda say average temperatures will rise by between 1.8 and 4.0 degrees Celsius this century due to carbon emissions from burning fossil fuels for power and transport, causing floods and famine and putting millions of lives at risk.

The United States is the world's biggest producer of carbon emissions - although experts predict that boom economy China will probably overtake it within a year as it builds a coal-fired power station every four days to feed demand.

Oxfam has created a self-serving global warming adaptation financing index based on the responsibility, equity and capability of each nation. It said after the United States, Japan owed 13 percent of the bill, followed by Germany on seven percent, Britain just over five percent, Italy, France and Canada between four and five percent and Spain, Australia and Korea three percent.

Germany wants the leaders of the G8 along with India, China, Brazil, Mexico and South Africa at their summit from June 6-8 to agree to limit the temperature rise to two degrees this century and to cut emissions by 50 percent from 1990 levels by 2050.
"We'll let the grandkids figure out how to get it done."
But in a draft of the final communique to be presented to the leaders at the summit, Washington rejected these goals in decidedly undiplomatic terms. "We have tried to 'tread lightly' but there is only so far we can go given our fundamental opposition to the German position," the United States said in red ink comments at the start of a copy of the draft seen by Reuters on Friday. "The treatment of climate change runs counter to our overall position and crosses multiple 'red lines' in terms of what we simply cannot agree to."
Bravo. Can you imagine the progressive Left in this country if we went along with this? They'd be in court (looking for Carter and Clinton appointed judges) as fast as possible suing everyone for violations of the 'Global Warming International Law'. You just know they would.
The blunt language of the rejection sets the scene for a showdown at the summit. A source close to the negotiations described them as "very tense".
Get a clue, Angela, the answer will remain 'no'.
Posted by:FOTSGreg

#16  "Oxfam to U.S.: Pay Half of Global Warming Tab"

U.S. to Oxfam: Fuck you.

Said with all due respect - which is NONE.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2007-05-30 22:35  

#15  Another organizatiion that has outlived its usefulness and been thoroughly infiltrated by what in an earlier age would have been called Communists. Basically who cares what these twits who want to spend other peoples' money say or think?
Posted by: RWV   2007-05-30 20:11  

#14  Pay it and cut the aid budget.
Posted by: anonymous2u   2007-05-30 17:13  

#13  How about we eliminate the majority of world food aid that is provided gratis buy Americans? Why feed people who have both hands out and simultaneously scream "Death to America!"? Seems counterproductive to me. But if Oxfam and cohorts insist on sustaining those who would destroy western society, then it's cash on the barrelhead, dollars preferred, but Euros will do in a pinch. Put your money where your mouth is and consider it our contribution to reduce hot air.

DonorsÂ’ shares of global food aid
Year........ U.S. .EU. Japan Canada
1988-89 57.4 24.8 3.8 ... 7.6
1994-96 47.3 34.7 5.8 ... 5.8
2000-02 61.8 17.2 5.6 ... 2.4
Posted by: ed   2007-05-30 12:53  

#12  Exactly what do they do with $50 billion ?
If they would cut out $50 billion worth of activity, the globe will cool accordingly. Therefore, they should send at least $25 billion to us to offset our half of the warming.
Posted by: Grusosh Borgia9229   2007-05-30 12:23  

#11  tu you beat me too it
Posted by: sinse   2007-05-30 11:17  

#10  Oxfam money subsidizes Third World despots. I have personally seen Oxfam bagged food products being sold in Kenyan markets.
Posted by: McZoid   2007-05-30 11:16  

#9  US to Oxfam - FOAD!
Posted by: 3dc   2007-05-30 11:16  

#8  ...and a PONY!
Posted by: mojo   2007-05-30 10:45  

#7  How about we pay nothing and see what happens?
Posted by: tu3031   2007-05-30 09:11  

#6  Not just "no", but "HELL NO!" STFU tranzi wankers - what gives you the right to make these decisions?
Rantburg sez that Oxfam is responsible for 87% of goreball warming due to hot air emissions. Hit the tip jar a$$holes.
Posted by: Spot   2007-05-30 08:19  

#5  Let's take that money and invest it in R&D for fusion power and other truly green technologies then. Two for one punch. Green, cheap, renewable energy and the lack of funds for the Middle East despots and terrorists. Win/win!
Posted by: DarthVader   2007-05-30 08:12  

#4  Just send them a bill for the US Navy's suppression of piracy which would otherwise shut down the world economy - how many tankers with oil would arrive in your ports?

Anyone else have the means to project enough power to keep the lanes open?
Posted by: Procopius2k   2007-05-30 07:20  

#3  I'll bet Oxfam gets most of it's money now from Governments not donations.

Coincidentally that they recommend governments give more money to "charidee"
Posted by: Bright Pebbles in Blairistan   2007-05-30 06:58  

#2  keep global warming below two degrees Celsius and average temperatures will rise by between 1.8 and 4.0 degrees Celsius

So if we do nothing, there is at least a chance we will met their goal? Yeah, I'd bet $50 billion on that!
Posted by: Bobby   2007-05-30 06:48  

#1  One's confidence that the administration will do any more than its recent limp quasi-humoring of the global wormening fantasy must be low, given its general awfulness.

Let's see, is Oxfam talking about the same US (and a few other advanced nations) that produces most of the medical research and information technology and food and other products and services, not to mention trade and emigration and study opportunities, or investment and financial management options, for the "poor" nations? In fact, isn't Oxfam itself a product of the wealth, freedom, technology, and security provided primarily by the US for going on half a century?

Ya think it ever crosses anyone's mind at the WH how much adult morale in the US would be helped by our govt. just once bitch-slapping this sort of nonsense in public?
Posted by: Verlaine   2007-05-30 02:39  

00:00