You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Court overrules Bush 'enemy combatant' policy
2007-06-11
Via Drudge.
RICHMOND, Va. - The Bush administration cannot legally detain a legal U.S. resident it believes is an al-Qaida sleeper agent without charging him, a divided federal appeals court ruled Monday. The case involves a Qatari national and suspected al-Qaida operative who is the only person being held in the United States as an "enemy combatant."

In the 2-1 decision, the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel found that the federal Military Commissions Act does not strip Ali al-Marri of his constitutional rights to challenge his accusers in court. It ruled the government must allow him to be released from military detention.

In a major setback for the administration, the appellate panel ruled that the government's evidence afforded no basis to treat al-Marri as an "enemy combatant." "The government cannot subject al-Marri to indefinite military detention. For in the United States, the military cannot seize and imprison civilians — let alone imprison them indefinitely," Judge Diana Gribbon Motz wrote.

Al-Marri has been held in a U.S. Navy brig in Charleston, S.C., for about four years without any charges.

The ruling sent the case back to a federal judge in South Carolina with instructions to direct Defense Secretary Robert Gates to release al-Marri from military custody within a reasonable period of time. The government can transfer al-Marri to civilian authorities to face criminal charges, initiate deportation proceedings, hold him as a witness in a grand jury proceeding or detain him for a limited period of time under the Patriot Act, an anti-terrorism law.
Sounds like he'll need to be charged.

This is a good thing. American citizens and legal residents are entitled to the protection of the Constitution, for good and bad: good in that they have constitutional protections, and bad because the Constitution does contain a specific treason clause.
Posted by:Steve White

#10  Yep, judge Motz, Clinton appointee in '94. May have a few aclu friends that influenced her 2-1 decision on 'habeus for all'. I hear the full 4th Circuit will be asked to rule on this travesty. Where's the investigative reporter that wants to find out who and how this miscreant Qatar al-Q got citizenship in the first place?
Posted by: Phineter Thraviger   2007-06-11 19:17  

#9  Judge Diana Gribbon Motz..., yes, a Billary appointment.
Posted by: Captain America   2007-06-11 18:05  

#8  Judge Diana Gribbon Motz..., yes, a Billary appointment.
Posted by: Captain America   2007-06-11 18:05  

#7  Click "Entire Post" and then click on "Comments"?

We'll see.
Posted by: Bobby   2007-06-11 17:25  

#6  Its the "comment" link in the comments.
Posted by: Ptah   2007-06-11 15:06  

#5  Fred, check the link for "comment": one of them has an HC=P, not HC=2. Your postgres statement is dying because of a non-numeric field, and it may by the HC parameter.
Posted by: Ptah   2007-06-11 15:04  

#4  It appears that commenters get irreparable syntax error messages unless they comment after clicking the "entire post" function. Interim site looks good. Nice planning.
Posted by: Pancho Gregum4996   2007-06-11 14:25  

#3  test getting syntax error messages
Posted by: Pancho Gregum4996   2007-06-11 14:18  

#2  test
Posted by: Pancho Gregum4996   2007-06-11 14:17  

#1  Sounds like we need to stop this messy business of capturing and keeping jihadis. Next time just line them up and shoot them. If somebody wimper about it just point them to Geneva and the un.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2007-06-11 14:10  

00:00