You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
Interview: General Petraeus on the Iraq War
2007-07-10
Four pages of questions and answers. Here are two of them. Go read the whole thing. Hattip Lucianne.com

GEN. David Petraeus, our nation's senior soldier in Iraq and the commander of Coalition forces, this week took the time to ex plain to Post readers where he believes we are right now - and where Iraq is headed.

Ralph Peters: The current military operations in Iraq appear comprehensive and tenacious, part of a long-term, integrated plan. What can we realistically expect to achieve?

Petraeus: Our primary goal is to work with our Iraqi counterparts to improve security for the Iraqi people. This is intended to give Iraqi leaders the time to resolve the tough political issues they face and to pursue internal reconciliation.

We're working to eliminate the capability for al Qaeda and any other extremist groups to plan, assemble forces and mount attacks. We're clearing extremist sanctuaries in Baghdad, as well as in the belts around the city and in Diyala Province - while pursuing terrorist and extremist leaders throughout Iraq.

As to reasonable expectations, we can expect a reduction in sectarian deaths and the gradual spread of Iraqi government authority. The level of sectarian deaths in Baghdad in June was the lowest in about a year. Nonetheless, extremists still have been able to carry out car bomb and other attacks. Obviously, there's considerable work to be done to reduce that ability.

Q: The performance of Iraqi security forces still seems to be a mixed bag. What are their strengths and weaknesses? Do they really have a national identity?

A: There is a national identity in the Iraqi security forces, though it varies in intensity and some units still exhibit the sectarian behavior that was so destructive in late 2006.

The Iraqi security forces often reflect the quality of their leaders. There are some very good units that are largely operating on their own, and there are some that need considerable Coalition assistance.

Of course, their strengths include a level of cultural awareness that no amount of training can give us. They have knowledge of the local areas that's particularly helpful, and their human intelligence networks can be of considerable value. Beyond that, they've been willing to fight - especially when their leaders set the example. Their losses in June were three times ours.

Their key weaknesses are a lack of logistical self-sufficiency, heavy weaponry shortages (improving) and the lack of the infrastructure so important in modern warfare - all of which we're helping them build up.

In the case of the local police, recruits and their families can be vulnerable to intimidation and coercion, if the situation where they live gets tough.
Posted by:trailing wife

#5  Maybe someday we will get civilian leadership in Washington that is worthy of our military.
Posted by: JohnQC   2007-07-10 20:37  

#4  Q: Now that the surge is fully in place, what's your sense of the positives and negatives thus far? If you could have more of any one item, what would it be? Troops? Time? Iraqi unity?

A: I can think of few commanders in history who wouldn't have wanted more troops, more time or more unity among their partners; however, if I could only have one at this point in Iraq, it would be more time. This is an exceedingly tough endeavor that faces countless challenges.

None of us, Iraqi or American, are anything but impatient and frustrated at where we are. But there are no shortcuts. Success in an endeavor like this is the result of steady, unremitting pressure over the long haul. It's a test of wills, demanding patience, determination and stamina from all involved.


Send that to your representatives.
Posted by: KBK   2007-07-10 14:19  

#3  This is insane! We need to start a WIN THE WAR campaign or something like that. Start a group that promotes honorable victory in Iraq instead of this constant drumbeat of defeat and shame.

I wonder how popular something like that would actually be. Does some thing like this already exist?
Posted by: eltoroverde   2007-07-10 11:24  

#2  The lefty losers will build their margin in Congress on the backs of dead American and Iraqi soldiers and civilians. Then when al Qaeda comes here, it will still be Bush's fault.
Posted by: Bobby   2007-07-10 09:44  

#1  Dhimmicrats are trying to derail General Petraeus even before he submits his report in September. They are racing to pull out and snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. They do not want to win. A win will not fit into their play book. They will hang a defeat on the Republicans. They will hammer this home repeatedly during the 2008 elections.
Posted by: JohnQC   2007-07-10 09:29  

00:00