You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
US faced with Iraqi Army turncoats
2007-07-10
Foot soldiers and US commanders say Iraq's security forces include officers working with insurgents.

Khalis, Iraq - As the US military continues to move through Diyala Province to uproot Al Qaeda fighters hidden amid its villages, an emerging foe may be helping to erode many of the successes the Americans are having in the three-week-old operation "Arrowhead Ripper."

According to Iraqi soldiers and US officers, militants linked to Al Qaeda are using tribal and family connections and, in some cases, also providing financial incentives to members of the Iraqi Army to help them remain strong and evade capture.

Al Qaeda's position is also bolstered by a broader internecine sectarian struggle for survival, power, and resources between Sunnis and Shiites that has spilled into the Army itself. This fight within Iraqi security services often pits elements of the Army against the Shiite-dominated police force.

In interviews with Iraqi soldiers from the battalion based in Khalis, about 10 miles northwest of the provincial capital Baquba, some troops allege that Sunni and Shiite officers cooperate, respectively, with Al Qaeda-linked militants and Shiite militias. They say that this ranges from turning a blind eye to illegal checkpoints to actually facilitating the transit of weapons, ammunition, and cash through the checkpoints manned by the Iraqi Army.

A US Army officer, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter, goes even further.

"There have been reports of Iraqi Army units transporting weapons for militias and insurgents in military vehicles," he says, adding that some officers even receive money from truckers in return for assurances that the roads on which their convoys travel will be protected.

For example, six Sunni officers in the Iraqi Army battalion in Khalis hail from the prominent Sunni Arab Obeidi tribe. They are accused by Shiite officers in the battalion, and even by some fellow Sunni soldiers, of being on the payroll of fellow Obeidi Khaled Albu-Abali, a former senior officer in Saddam Hussein's army, who is suspected to have links to Al Qaeda in Iraq.

"Yes, some Sunnis in our battalion are sympathetic to these elements because they still cannot accept an Iraq where Shiites have power," says Maj. Hussein Kadhim.

In an interview, three of the Sunni officers deny the charges and accuse some of their Shiite comrades of running death squads and manning illegal checkpoints in cooperation with the recently formed Khalis Emergency Response Force (ERF), a mostly Shiite paramilitary group, and the Khalis Shiite mayor, Uday Adnan, to cleanse the whole area of Sunnis.

Maj. Wissam Hamid admits, though, that some Sunni villages in Diyala have sought the protection of Al Qaeda operatives against Shiite militias and warns that more will do the same if the militias are not reined in.

These competing interests and allegiances – that often get in the way of the American mission in Diyala to defeat Al Qaeda forces – were on full display here last Thursday.

While Iraqi officers were having lunch, Maj. Faisal Majid, a Sunni, received a call on his cellphone. The person on the other end told him that a mob, backed by a local paramilitary group, had descended on the homes of the Albu-Abali Sunni family. The group was about to loot and set the properties on fire, the caller said.

US Army Maj. Dom Dionne, who is part of the team working with the Iraqi battalion in Khalis, rushed to the scene. When he arrived with his men, not a single shop in the area was open. A police pickup truck blocked a side street where the Albu-Abali homes are located. Members of the ERF, a Shiite paramilitary group dressed in green camouflage and red berets, stood on street corners.

Major Dionne was greeted by the ERF leader Col. Hussein Hamham. One of Colonel Hamham's men showed off a sword that was found in the home of Khaled Albu-Abali. Many in Khalis say he's now a senior leader in the Islamic State in Iraq – an Al Qaeda umbrella group – who goes by the pseudonym Abu Walid al-Shami.

They used this to kill Shiites," says the policeman.

Hamham assures Dionne that his men had simply gone into the homes for a routine search. The next day, all six homes were looted and set on fire. Iraqi security forces did little to stop it.

Dionne suspects it was the work of the Mahdi Army militia of radical Shiite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr in retaliation for attacks on the homes of Shiites east of Khalis a few days before.

There is no proof that Albu-Abali is a member of Al Qaeda, says Dionne, but the episode is just one of many examples of the sectarian disputes involving Iraqi security forces that the US Army often finds itself having to navigate.

"The military goes through a vetting process to ensure that the soldiers are not known criminals or insurgents, but there is no process after that to screen them periodically to make sure they have not turned or started supporting criminals and terrorists," says Dionne.He says that is the responsibility of the sovereign Iraqi government and not the US Army. "With our current manning, it's not feasible," he adds.

Furthermore, the US military cannot put too much pressure on Sunni tribes in Diyala because, according to the Arrowhead Ripper commander, Gen. Mick Bednarek, it needs them to renounce Al Qaeda, provide intelligence, and encourage their sons to join the police and Army.




Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC

#11  Immediate death sentence.
Posted by: newc   2007-07-10 16:34  

#10  Oh, no! MORE doom and gloom? Poor Davey Petreaus doen't stand a chance!
Posted by: Bobby   2007-07-10 15:53  

#9  spys & corruption during war..

According to the ancient war oracles and secrete rumor mills...

During the course of all wars, all sorts of payoffs and bribes are made to the local indigenous enterprises, 'all varieties insurgent' and the local war lords, it's is a time honored tradition.

an example:
The rumor was [a few years ago] in the Republic of Vietnam, that the local VC chief/s were paid NOT to attack Brown and Root around the Chu Lai area during the Concrete Run Way project that replaced the temp aluminum matting..

sniper rounds and occasional mortars weren't counted.
Posted by: RD   2007-07-10 15:32  

#8  I'm sure the people actually in the field caught on pretty quickly to the fact that you can't turn your back on an Arab---twice. The fact that they're willing to talk about it, means the top brass is starting to caught on.
Posted by: gromgoru   2007-07-10 15:25  

#7  I would say, if you catch someone working with AQ, skin them alive in the town square and nail their hide to the side of the town hall as a warning to others. Then drop their body in the trash heap outside of town for the dogs to eat.
Posted by: DarthVader   2007-07-10 15:04  

#6  Screw that and the PC bullshit. Show them the bayonette.
Posted by: wxjames   2007-07-10 14:51  

#5  Counterintelligence guys live for just this. When they compile a dossier on a corrupt officer, at a particular point they turn it over to SOCOM and he has a fatal accident. Along with as many of his associates as possible. You know, group heart attacks and things like that.

Then they let it be known through back channels why.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2007-07-10 14:29  

#4  I'm rather surprised that they're mentioning the Army cooperating with AQ. The Army has a reputation for relative honesty and competence. Also the Army may has many Sunni officers, but the rank and file are Shia and Kurds. I can't see the enlisted puting up with this treason.

As for the Police, this is old news. Zarqawi was captured twice by the IP and managed to escape each time with a combination of bribes and threats.

Al
Posted by: Frozen Al   2007-07-10 14:19  

#3  My favorite dead horse rears its ugly head again. Still comes down to knowing/understanding the tribal culture and who is who. Something our gov't usually fails at w/every turn. They ain't westerners folks, quit treating them as such.
Posted by: Broadhead6   2007-07-10 14:09  

#2  What the story amounts to is a reporter recording a bunch of finger pointing and gossip as fact.
Posted by: Chuck Simmins   2007-07-10 14:08  

#1  I would consider this report good news for a couple of reasons. First of all it says that we are finally getting some good intelligence in learning who's who as far as corrupt officers are concerned. We have known about this problem for as long as we have been in Iraq but getting a clear picture of the problem has been elusive. We seem to be getting a grip on that.

And secondly, in some cases the connections between these offices and tribal groups can be exploited to bring those groups under the government umbrella as has been the case in Anbar and to some degree, Diyala.

So overall I would have selected a different headline. Something more along the lines of "US getting clearer picture of tribal alliances".
Posted by: crosspatch   2007-07-10 14:03  

00:00