You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Britain
2 UK bomb suspects freed without charge
2007-07-16
Two men arrested in connection with failed car bomb attacks in London and Glasgow were released without charge on Sunday, British police said. The men, aged 28 and 25, were arrested early on July 2 by Strathclyde police at the residences of the Royal Alexandra Hospital in Paisley, Scotland, LondonÂ’s Metropolitan Police said.

Officers were given more time on Saturday to question a third man, Mohammed Asha, 26, who was arrested by counter-terrorism officers on the northbound M6 motorway in Cheshire, northern England, on June 30. His detention warrant will now expire on July 21. Three people have so far been charged over the attacks.

British police charged Sabeel Ahmed, 26, of Liverpool, on Saturday with failing to disclose information that could have prevented an act of terrorism. Earlier the same day, Australian Federal Police charged 27-year-old Mohamed Haneef, SabeelÂ’s cousin, with providing support to a terrorist organisation. Iraqi-trained doctor Bilal Abdulla, 27, was charged in Britain last week with conspiring to cause explosions.

A seventh man, Indian engineer Kafeel Ahmed, 27, who is SabeelÂ’s brother, is under police guard in hospital after being badly burned when a jeep was driven into an airport terminal building in Glasgow, Scotland, and set ablaze on June 30. That attack came 36 hours after the discovery of two cars packed with fuel, gas tanks and nails primed to explode in central London. Police think the two incidents were linked. All but one of the eight original suspects are medics from the Middle East or India.

Dana Asha — wife of Mohammed and the only woman among those detained in the case — was arrested at the same time as her husband, but was released without charge on Thursday.
Posted by:Fred

#1  Big difference between UK process and ours. Either they were hasty and fickled in nabbing at random with skimpy intelligence or they had the goods but want to see who they contact and where they go. It seems we stop this crap before it goes critical (Lackawana, Ft. Dix, JFK, etc.) and we keep them incarcerated until the ACLU can convince some Clinton appointee to scream Habeas Corpus! Then we can appeal until Gitmo freezes over. But there seems to be a strong difference between two great countries separated by a common language and law?
Posted by: Jack is Back!   2007-07-16 09:22  

00:00