You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
Study: Americans Don't Understand Others
2007-07-18
Rugged American individualism could hinder our ability to understand other peoples' point of view, a new study suggests. And in contrast, the researchers found that Chinese are more skilled at understanding other people's perspectives, possibly because they live in a more "collectivist" society.

"This cultural difference affects the way we communicate," said study co-author and cognitive psychologist Boaz Keysar of the University of Chicago.

The study, though oversimplified compared to real life, was instructive. Keysar and his colleagues arranged two blocks on a table so participants could see both. However, a piece of cardboard obstructed the view of one block so a "director," sitting across from the participant, could only see one block. When the director asked 20 American participants (none of Asian descent) to move a block, most were confused as to which block to move and did not take into account the director's perspective. Even though they could have deduced that, from the director's seat, only one block was on the table.

Most of the 20 Chinese participants, however, were not confused by the hidden block and knew exactly which block the director was referring to. While following directions was relatively simple for the Chinese, it took Americans twice as long to move a block.

"That strong, egocentric communication of Westerners was nonexistent when we looked at Chinese," Keysar said. "The Chinese were very much able to put themselves in the shoes of another when they were communicating."

The results are detailed in the July issue of the journal Psychological Science.

Collectivist societies, such as the Chinese, place more value on the needs of the group and less on the autonomy of the individual. In these societies, understanding other peoples' experiences is a more critical social skill than it is among typically more individualist Americans. "Of course, these are very gross oversimplifications," said Keysar. "Even in America, you can find collectivist societies. For example, working class people tend to be much more collective."

Culture appears to direct our eyes to read others' emotions, too.

Psychologists at Hokkaido University in Japan have found that Japanese gaze at the shape of a person's eyes, while Americans focus on the mouth. When people from the two cultures interact, these crisscrossed sightlines can lead to miscommunication.

"We all know people from different cultures are different. This is not new. But what research is now showing is how they're different and what are the implications," Keysar told LiveScience. "If we are aware of how we think differently, this can go a long way toward not allowing these differences to get in the way of reaching mutual understanding."
Posted by:Seafarious

#20  The experiment also proves that Chinese are much more subservient to authority (aka "the director") and less likely to act on their own perceptions.

Americans will point out that the emperor has no clothes; or that there are two blocks even if the "director" doesn't know that.


Yeah, that's how I'd interpret it, too. If you interpret "move the block" to mean "the one I can see", when you know perfectly well there are two blocks, then you've got a problem.

If the Chinese are so much more capable of understanding the perspectives of other people, why is their history marked by a xenophobia/racism that makes the antebellum South look metropolitan?

Oh, and did they make sure the "director" didn't provide any subtle hints to the subjects?
Posted by: Rob Crawford   2007-07-18 19:56  

#19  From Bash.Org

A worldwide survey was conducted by the UN. The only question asked was:"Would you please give your honest opinion about solutions to the
food shortage in the rest of the world?"

The survey was a huge failure...

In Africa they didn't know what "food" meant.

In Eastern Europe they didn't know what "honest" meant.

In Western Europe they didn't know what "shortage" meant.

In China they didn't know what "opinion" meant.

In the Middle East they didn't know what "solution" meant.

In South America they didn't know what "please" meant.

And in the USA they didn't know what "the rest of the world" meant
Posted by: badanov   2007-07-18 18:07  

#18  yep, yep. It is not surprising that we Mericans rank below the Jihadist countries who all understand each other very well.
Posted by: AT   2007-07-18 17:59  

#17  Meanwhile, in Seattle, in an attempt to help us understand others, the Seattle Port Authority has permanently banned Christmas Trees after a fundamenalist Jewish Rabbi raised a fit.
You may have 'undecorated' conifers, but no garland, or lights, or other religious symbols.....
Posted by: USN, Ret.   2007-07-18 17:49  

#16  I agree with lotp that there are differences and Nisbett's book is fascinating. However, these comparisons in the popular press always focus on how Americans are so screwed up and others are so superior. When people start emigrating from the US to these countries and stop immigrating to the US from them, I'll start to care.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2007-07-18 17:46  

#15  I would like to do a study on whether a hammer causes professors to forget what they just read.
Preliminary experiments indicate that a hammer landing on ones head changes the subject radically. A hammer landing on other parts of the body cause reluctance and lack of cooperation. A hammer not landing causes fear and caution, and sometimes changes the debate to the need for a full scale study.
Posted by: wxjames   2007-07-18 16:45  

#14  We understand, we just don't give a crap.
Posted by: mojo   2007-07-18 16:40  

#13  This extends even to what people focus on in photos, for instance. The asians who were tested tend to remember the spatial relationship among object but not the details of the objects and, when asked to describe the situation being represented, talk about the scene as a whole. The westerners tend to describe someone doing something to someone/thing, i.e. individual actors who initiate their own actions and are responsible for the outcome.

This says to me two things. Either the asians in question are expecting a trick question or the pictures were badly chosen. I bet if they are shown a picture of their leader they would say it is a picture of the leader and not be distracted by the brick wall in the background, but in a photo of a fish in water they get distracted by the non-essentials? Sounds like a flawed study to me. I would expect many Asians would give whatever answer they felt pleased the questionaire rather then what they really thought.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2007-07-18 16:02  

#12  The study also noted that lemmings rated highest among mammals in their ability to understand the perspectives of those around them.
Posted by: Anon   2007-07-18 15:26  

#11  There are some pretty well-validated experimental data on cultural differences in perception and cognition. Nisbett's The Geography of Thought reports some of them.

Those who are culturally and linguistically grounded in western tradition see individuals who act and thereby both impact the situation and bear responsibility (positive or negative) for the outcomes. Those who are culturally grounded in the Chinese and related traditions see interconnected systems of ambiguous or diffuse responsibility and action.

This extends even to what people focus on in photos, for instance. The asians who were tested tend to remember the spatial relationship among object but not the details of the objects and, when asked to describe the situation being represented, talk about the scene as a whole. The westerners tend to describe someone doing something to someone/thing, i.e. individual actors who initiate their own actions and are responsible for the outcome.

FWIW. The cultural difference theory directly contradicts some evolutionary psychologists who think that cognition is just genetic and is more or less the same for all people everywhere.
Posted by: lotp   2007-07-18 15:18  

#10  Can I get a large salary to make people move blocks all day long? At least I won't write a paper to make everyone think its important!
Posted by: Oldcat   2007-07-18 13:31  

#9  I understand the rest of the world just fine.

They are all fucking idiots, much like the left here.
Posted by: DarthVader   2007-07-18 12:34  

#8  Left wing liberal scientist takes opportunity to bash America once again from the ivory tower in unbiased scientific study croc of horse pucky sophomoronic paper. It's Bush's fault.
Posted by: JohnQC   2007-07-18 12:21  

#7  "Pop Psych" strikes again! More droolin' blitherosity from self-righteous highbrows on how low Mairkuns are.

"You've never worked in the private sector! They expect results!" Ray, 'Ghostbusters'
Posted by: Almost Anonymous5839   2007-07-18 12:01  

#6  I don't understand this - is Boaz Keysar an American or not?
Posted by: Percy Snusotle2643   2007-07-18 11:54  

#5  Jeez, doc, looks like we need more data. Better put in for another grant. And park the Mercedes out back where no one can see it. Or maybe you could block it off with a piece of cardboard so us dumbass Americans can't see it...
Posted by: tu3031   2007-07-18 11:34  

#4  "collectivist", "working class" Typical commie bullsh*t self-justification.
Posted by: Spot   2007-07-18 11:29  

#3  I call BS on the whole thing. I've heard this over and over and have yet to hear anyone wonder why other people have so much trouble understanding Americans. This is typical quackery that equates agreement or tolerance with understanding. If you don't agree you don't understand.

The experiment also proves that Chinese are much more subservient to authority (aka "the director") and less likely to act on their own perceptions.

Americans will point out that the emperor has no clothes; or that there are two blocks even if the "director" doesn't know that.

Then, of course, there is the implication that collectivism is superior to individualism.

Bah to the whole damn thing.
Posted by: AlanC   2007-07-18 11:21  

#2  What. A. Crock.
Posted by: Rex Mundi   2007-07-18 11:19  

#1  The other side of the coin is Americans come from the rest of the world so we have a particularly good insite into the madness our forefathers left. We also have tourists and UN Ambassadors all over the place and a media constantly telling us how much better they are over there and how foul we are.

Compared to other nations like China that are insular and closed and have minimal exposure to other cultures.

I think perhaps American's understand others better than those others would like to think.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2007-07-18 11:10  

00:00