You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia
Russian train derailed after "bang" on track
2007-08-14
A Russian express train heading from Moscow to St Petersburg was derailed late on Monday after the driver heard a loud bang under the wheels, overturning carriages and wounding dozens of passengers. The derailment occurred in the Novgorod region, about 500 km (300 miles) north of Moscow, near the village of Malaya Vishera. The line between Moscow and Russia's second city of St Petersburg is among the country's busiest.

Russian Railways said in a statement it was the result of "unauthorised interference in the functioning of the train". One eyewitness said the derailment was preceded by two explosions. "There was a bang under the train. Unfortunately that is the only way we can describe it until investigators and the FSB (state security service) ... reach their own conclusions," Sergei Mikhailov, an aide to Russian Railways chief Vladimir Yakunin, told Vesti-24 television station.

The train derailed just after crossing a bridge over a road, said a Reuters photographer at the scene.

A conductor on the train showed Reuters a video he recorded on his mobile telephone of a crater about 2 metres (6 ft) across that could be seen on the bridge, where the rails should have been. "We heard two explosions, then the train put on the brakes suddenly," one conductor, who did not want to be identified, told Reuters. "The train shook. A panic started," he said. "We smashed out the glass and helped the passengers out ... The worst damage was in the restaurant car. That is where most of the casualties were."

Viktor Beltsov, a spokesman for Russia's Emergencies Ministry, said 27 injured people were admitted to hospital. "Three are in a serious condition," he said. No one was killed. Russian news agencies said 60 people were hurt but most did not need hospital treatment. The Reuters photographer said nearly all of the carriages and the locomotive were off their tracks, while at least three carriages were tipped onto their side. Powerful lights had been set up at the trackside as FSB investigators inspected the site and railway workers with cutting equipment removed damaged rails.

"As a result of an explosion at 21:38 (1738 GMT) ... several carriages of passenger train No. 166 from Moscow to St Petersburg were derailed," Russian Railways said in an initial statement. Later statements removed mention of an explosion.
Posted by:Seafarious

#9  KOMMERSANT > PUTIN to personally supervise investigation and kept informed, + FSB to tighten security all over Russia. *Iff this were the Cold War I'd say Putin wants evidence and is getting ready to blame the USA, andor NATO = USA by extens.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2007-08-14 23:44  

#8  From the overhead power lines in the derailment pictures, it looks like that line had a single track, so the bombers were hoping to catch a train going onto the bridge (60 foot dropoff). The train was traveling at 118 mph.
Posted by: ed   2007-08-14 11:53  

#7  Well if the train would have been coming from the other direction the explosion would have been on the right side to cause the destruction that you talk about. Maybe they just got their timing of the train schedules off... instead of the south bound train they got the north bound train...

Blackvenom-2001
Posted by: Blackvenom-2001   2007-08-14 11:11  

#6  Who knew the Amish were so active in Russia?
Posted by: BA   2007-08-14 09:27  

#5  Sorta what I meant, TW. Either you blow the bridge, which is sometimes difficult, unless you're in Minnesota, or you derail the train before the bridge, so when it goes off the track, it tears down the bridge.

But after the bridge could be splodeydope logic.
Posted by: Bobby   2007-08-14 09:20  

#4  a crater about 2 metres (6 ft) across that could be seen on the bridge, where the rails should have been.

Perhaps the miscreants expected the bridge to collapse onto the road below, dumping the overturned train into oncoming traffic? Are there many cars on the roads 300 miles north of Moscow, nowadays?
Posted by: trailing wife   2007-08-14 08:18  

#3  well you can expect too much commn sense form the militants fighting in the Caucasus
Posted by: Jesus saves   2007-08-14 08:09  

#2  A bang on the track could've been a broken rail - either under the train, or before it got there. Broken rails do not usually leave craters, though.

But if you wanna blow up a train, you do it just before the bridge, not right after it!
Posted by: Bobby   2007-08-14 07:53  

#1  After "bang" on track? WTF kind of description is that? More like, "a train was blown up by IED". Jeez, who writes these?
Posted by: gromky   2007-08-14 07:41  

00:00