You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
Analysis: Russia-China military cooperation on the rocks
2007-08-25
China is running into problems in its military technology dealings with Russia. The country has postponed high-level military talks on defense technology and stopped all new military contracts until Russia delivers an overdue shipment of aircraft, according to industry sources in both countries.

China has also complained about the quality of Russian weapons. Russian dealers, on the other hand, are upset about blatant Chinese imitations of their products, built from designs supplied in the understanding that the weapons were to be purchased.

The aircraft issue involves a deal signed in 2005 whereby China agreed to purchase from Russia 30 IL-76 transport aircraft and eight IL-78 aerial refueling tankers. However, Tashkent Aircraft Plant, based in the capital of Uzbekistan, which was to have manufactured the IL-76 and IL-78, declared soon after the signing that the plant was unable to build the planes independently due to financial and technical problems.

To resolve this issue, Russia has given three proposals to the Chinese side, according to a source from Rosoboroonexport, a state-owned military trading company. One is to coproduce the plane's parts in Tashkent and Russian Ulianovsk or Voronezh aviation factories, with final assembly of the IL-76 in Voronezh. The second is to fully manufacture the aircraft in Russia. The third is to assemble all the planes in Tashkent with most of the parts produced in Russia.

Whichever solution is selected, additional investment will be required from the Russian side to add new equipment to the Ulianovsk and Voronezh aviation factories. Consequently, Rosoboroonexport has asked the Chinese partner to accept a higher price for the aircraft.

China's response has been to twice postpone an annual high-level conference on cooperation in defense technology. Beijing has indicated that the condition to restart the talks is for Russia to fulfill the aircraft contract. Russia contends that the existence of this problem is reason enough to hold new discussions, without any condition.

This Chinese tendency to set preconditions for political talks and other negotiations is well-known to U.S. and Japanese negotiators. Now the strategy is being applied to the Russians.

To add salt to the wound, China has also criticized the quality of some Russian weapons it previously purchased. For example, it has complained of the short service life of optical/electronic detection devices (IRST) for the SU-27SK fighter. The Russian factory has deflected the blame, saying the problems are caused by improper usage. Photos of the IRST used for the Chinese air force's SU-27SK show that they are used without protective coverings even in inclement weather.

One of the biggest buyers of Russian arms, the Chinese air force, or PLAAF, has purchased 100 advanced Su30MKK multipurpose fighters and 48 earlier version SU-27SK fighters. It also obtained license production rights for the 200 SU-27SK, which started in 1996. However, the contract was suspended after 95 China-made J11A were completed last year. Russia reportedly backed out of the deal due to technical reservations.

The Chinese navy also received 12 Kilo Class 877/636 diesel submarines and four Type 956E/EM missile destroyers, other naval subsystems for Chinese carriers, and new warships as well as more than eight battalions of S-300PMU/PMU-1 and another eight battalions of S-300PMU-2 long range surface-to-air missiles, deployed by the Chinese air force in recent decades.

For its part, Moscow is unhappy with China's massive production of imitation versions of Russian weapons. Many Russian arms manufacturers have told the Western press how surprised they were by the scale of China's copycat capabilities. In many cases, Chinese dealers will express their intention to purchase Russian arms, begin negotiations, ask as many technical questions as possible, take photos and videos of the weapons, request all available documents, come back to the table to "discuss" more technical issues, and after a few more "negotiations," the dealers disappear. Two or three years later, a Chinese copy of the weapon under discussion appears on the international market.

A typical example is the Chinese A100 multiple launch rocket system (MLRS), an imitation of the Russian SMERCH MLRS, without even superficial changes in shape. The Chinese PLZ05 155-mm self-propelled gun (SPG) system is also a copy of the Russian 2S19M1 SPG.

The same trick has been used by the air force and navy. In the mid-1990s, China asked the Russian Phazotron Radar Design Bureau to help the PLAAF to upgrade their F8II fighters. For this purpose, China purchased two ZHUK-8II airborne radars from Phazotron. Certainly many technical documents were transferred, as the Chinese had promised to buy at least 100 of the radar devices. But, the Chinese never came back. Two years ago, the new Chinese F8IIM fighter was released with the new "indigenous multi-function radar."

"That is a copy of our radar," the designer of Phazotrol told this author. "We were so inexperienced at that time."

Along with the Type 956E/EM missile destroyer, the Chinese navy received subsystems from Russia including the Fregat M2EM 3D radar and MR-90 tracking radar and sonar. The same radar system has been seen on China's domestic Type 054A missile frigate (FFG).

"This is our radar!" was the first comment by Russian designers from Salyut factory when they saw photos of the 054A FFG taken from far. After more careful examination, they added, "Unbelievable, the speed at which they were copied."

Italy and France had similar experiences during their military cooperation honeymoon with China in the 1980s. At that time, China purchased two sets of Sea Tiger shipborne radars, two sets of Crotale air defense missiles, and two sets of the TAVITAC naval command and control systems from France, and a few sets of the sonar and EW systems from Italy. Chinese versions of the above systems are fitted on Chinese navy battleships today.
Posted by:john frum

#7  LOL. Em Pot calling kettle darkie.
Tu-4 etc.
Posted by: Thomas Woof   2007-08-25 19:57  

#6  I wouldn't discount Chinese. If we had someone's elses designs on a superior weapon, we'd copy and steal just like we did off of Nazi technologies after the war and put it to maximum use. We've got to keep our secrets close!
Posted by: Boss Craising2882   2007-08-25 18:57  

#5  Well all those copys are functional. The Naval one are the big worry. We have a shrinking Navy and they have a growing one even crappy ships can be a threat if you have enough of them. Too few good ones are no protection against them.
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom   2007-08-25 18:46  

#4  Or, if you're Clinton and Gore, in exchange for campaign $$ flowing through Buddhist nuns.
Posted by: lotp   2007-08-25 15:57  

#3  The Russians shouldn't take it personally. When I was working in the aerospace industry, Boeing sold the Chinese a 707 as a sign of good will. A few years later the Chinese introduced a near exact copy. Fortunately the Chinese made a few mistakes in their measurements and their copy was dangerously unstable.

You give the Chinese anything at your own risk.

Al
Posted by: Frozen Al   2007-08-25 15:20  

#2  Neither nation has real power projection capabilities so the only kind of cooperation they could expect is transfering equipment/pilots to fight on the other sides team against an enemy. Since most Chinese equipment is Soviet based I should think they wouldn't require a whole lot of cooperation at all.

Me thinks the cooperation was simply for propoganda purposes.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2007-08-25 13:22  

#1  China has also complained about the quality of Russian weapons.

You know it's got to be bad when the Chinese complain about crappy quality.

Russian dealers, on the other hand, are upset about blatant Chinese imitations of their products, built from designs supplied in the understanding that the weapons were to be purchased.

Nobody saw that coming. Nosiree, Bob.

China's response has been to twice postpone an annual high-level conference on cooperation in defense technology. Beijing has indicated that the condition to restart the talks is for Russia to fulfill the aircraft contract.

Otherwise known as the "North Korean Gambit".

Russia contends that the existence of this problem is reason enough to hold new discussions, without any condition.

Otherwise known as "Hey, wait a minute! We're getting screwed, blued and tattooed!"

This Chinese tendency to set preconditions for political talks and other negotiations is well-known to U.S. and Japanese negotiators.

Who are all fed up with playing on the usual tilted pitch.

Now the strategy is being applied to the Russians.

Awww, poor baby!

To add salt to the wound, China has also criticized the quality of some Russian weapons it previously purchased.

To have chiseling cheapskate Chinese bastards diss your own garbage military gear has really gotta hurt.

For its part, Moscow is unhappy with China's massive production of imitation versions of Russian weapons.

Something China has never, ever done before.

Many Russian arms manufacturers have told the Western press how surprised they were by the scale of China's copycat capabilities. In many cases, Chinese dealers will express their intention to purchase Russian arms, begin negotiations, ask as many technical questions as possible, take photos and videos of the weapons, request all available documents, come back to the table to "discuss" more technical issues, and after a few more "negotiations," the dealers disappear. Two or three years later, a Chinese copy of the weapon under discussion appears on the international market.

So, they finally caught on to China's favorite ploy of buying only one of something?

"That is a copy of our radar," the designer of Phazotrol told this author. "We were so inexperienced at that time."

Translation: "We got taken like a couple of carnival marks!"

Cost of the Cold War with Russia: Untold gazillions of dollars.

Annual trade deficit with China: Over 120 billion dollars

Watching China screw Russia like a two-bit whore: Priceless!
Posted by: Zenster   2007-08-25 13:20  

00:00