You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Europe
Muhammad cartoon: Sweden 'sorry for hurt feelings'
2007-08-31
Pakistan has added its voice to that of Iran in condemning the publication of a cartoon of the Prophet Muhammad in newspaper Nerikes Allehanda. Sweden has told Pakistan it is sorry if the publication hurt Muslim feelings. The protest concerned a cartoon by artist Lars Vilks, which showed the head of Muhammad on the body of a dog. In a statement, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Islamabad said Pakistan condemned the publication "in the strongest terms."

"Regrettably, the tendency among some Europeans to mix the freedom of expression with an outright and deliberate insult to 1.3 billion Muslims in the world is on the rise," the statement said.
Interesting that a senior government official of a predominantly Islamic country takes it upon himself to speak on behalf of all Muslims world-wide. No separation of mosque and state in the Caliphate, kuffr.
The Swedish Chargé d'Affaires in Islamabad, Lennart Holst, was given a dressing down on Thursday by Miangul Akbar Zed, a middle-ranking official at the Pakistani Foreign Office. The official protest was relayed during the course of a planned meeting.

According to the Pakistani statement, Holst said the Swedish government "fully shared the views of the Muslim community" and called the publication on August 18th "unfortunate."

Swedish Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Anna Björkander told The Local it had been a "misunderstanding" on the part of the Pakistanis to conclude that the government fully shared the views of the Muslim community. Björkander added, however: "The Chargé d'Affaires said he was sorry if the publication had hurt Muslim feelings."

She also said that Holst had told the Pakistani official that freedom of the press is strongly protected in the Swedish constitution. "Otherwise the Swedish government has no opinion on the matter," she said.

Nerikes Allehanda editor Ulf Johansson told The Local that it would be "strange" if the Swedish Chargé d'Affaires had apologized over the cartoon, and would contradict the Swedish government's previous line of not interfering with press freedom. "We have noted this and contacted the Swedish Foreign Ministry for an explanation," he said. Johansson said that he was not particularly concerned by Pakistan's intervention.

"The most important thing for me is our relations with the local community here. I am less interested in what foreign governments have to say."
Bravo. And in today's Sweden, that's a courageous statement.
A demonstration was held outside Nerikes Allehanda's headquarters in Örebro on Friday, and another is planned tomorrow. Johansson said that Friday's demonstration was peaceful, with demonstrators shouting slogans and brandishing placards.

The complaint from Pakistan comes several days after a Swedish diplomat in Teheran was summoned by the government there to face a similar protest.

Pakistan says it plans to consult with the Organization of Islamic Conferences to determine its future course of action when cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad were published.
Looney Tunes.
Posted by:mrp

#8  "Attack and dismantle" Islamic theocratic states? Sounds like something more than a "reprisal" to me. And once the theocratic governments are dismantled (assuming there's a Congress or Parliament willing to sign on for such a mission), who replaces the theocrats?

The Bush Doctrine already declares that the US holds the state sponsors of terrorism responsible for their actions. As Afghanistan and Iraq have profoundly demonstrated, that's a bloody tall order as is.
Posted by: mrp   2007-08-31 20:15  

#7  Doh! Dratted cookie monster. Post #6 was mine.
Posted by: Zenster   2007-08-31 19:38  

#6  A "unilateral reprisal"? What's that?

As in, "We don't need no steenking coalitions." Every single Western country should feel free to attack and dismantle any Islamic theocracy as it sees fit. Cooperation is encouraged to save time and effort, but there should be no need for concensus or outside approval in order to act against the threat of Islam.
Posted by: Black Bart Crereng4893   2007-08-31 19:30  

#5   Islam of nearly all stripes wants the West destroyed and we are doomed if we cannot deem that an underlying principal worthy of unilateral reprisal.

A "unilateral reprisal"? What's that?
Posted by: mrp   2007-08-31 19:20  

#4  "Regrettably, the tendency among some Europeans to mix the freedom of expression with an outright and deliberate insult to 1.3 billion Muslims in the world is on the rise," the statement said.

No "mix" about it. Free people have the absolute right to make "outright and deliberate" insults to Islam, Muslims, Mohammed and even their sacred Allah. In fact—even as I type this—I am farting in Mecca's general direction.

Interesting that a senior government official of a predominantly Islamic country takes it upon himself to speak on behalf of all Muslims world-wide. No separation of mosque and state in the Caliphate, kuffr.

The sooner that we finally treat Islam as a monolithic religious body, the more coherent our dealings with it will become. Islam of nearly all stripes wants the West destroyed and we are doomed if we cannot deem that an underlying principal worthy of unilateral reprisal.
Posted by: Zenster   2007-08-31 17:29  

#3  Johansson said that Friday's demonstration was peaceful, with demonstrators shouting slogans and brandishing placards.

"peaceful" yeah shuuuure. Just what slogans were being shouted? And what did those placards say?
Posted by: Thinemp Whimble   2007-08-31 12:41  

#2  If newspapers all over the world continue to publish cartoons that insult the so-called prophet (piss be upon him), will the muslims ever get tired of seething? Or will they eventually become desensitized? Maybe just a little bit of desensitization is exactly what they need as a first little baby step toward reaching some kind of tolerance and accommodation with the rest of the world. So maybe these little cartoons are actually doing them a favor. They should be grateful.
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2007-08-31 11:46  

#1  The protest concerned a cartoon by artist Lars Vilks, which showed the head of Muhammad on the body of a dog.

I demand an apology to for this vile offense to dogs.
Posted by: tu3031   2007-08-31 08:45  

00:00