You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Britain
'Rewrite British history to reflect other cultures'
2007-09-26
Parts of British history need to be rewritten to emphasise the roles played by other races and religions like Muslims, ...
who else?
... a prominent race relations campaigner has said. Trevor Philips, the village idiot chairman of the new Commission for Equalities and Human Rights, said the history of Britain did not properly reflect the contribution of other cultures.
Yet another PC/pomo 'human rights' commission that managed to focus on one thing and one thing only.
Rewriting the countryÂ’s history would demonstrate to Britons in the 21st century how other groups apart from Anglo Saxons shaped the nation.
The Roman, Celts, Normans, Vikings, ... oh, not them.
He told a fringe meeting at the Labour conference: "We may need to revisit our national story – we want to rewrite that story to tell the whole story."
I'll bet it was a 'fringe' meeting.
The rewriting should start with the story of how the English fleet led by Sir Francis Drake fought off the Spanish Armada in 1588, he said. The important role played by the Muslim Turks, who delayed the sailing of the Spanish fleet so that the English ships were better prepared, had been airbrushed out of the story however.
Pro'ly because it was less important than Sir Francis Drake putting steel into English spines when it was needed.
Mr Phillips said: "When we talk about the Armada, it was the Turks who saved us because they held up the Armada after a request from Elizabeth I.

"LetÂ’s rewrite that, so we have an ideal that brings us together so that it can bind us together in stormy times ahead in the next century."

Mr Phillips, the former chairman of the Commission for Racial Equality, declined to offer any other examples of parts of British history that should be rewritten.
So as not to make himself a bigger fool in public.
He also said that he supported a campaign by the musician Billy Bragg for a new written constitution to define what it means to be British in the 21st century.
Who needs a parliament anyways?
"We have to have an expression that is native and right for us," he said. "We have to have a more explicit set of understandings under which we can all live together."

Mr Phillips, who was educated at QueenÂ’s College Boys School in Guyana, also suggested that there should be a set celebration for when people were given British nationality. Nationality lessons were necessary because people were moving around the country more than ever before, providing less opportunities to integrate. Last year 6.5 million people moved house, he said.
And some of them never seem to integrate even when they stay in one place.
Earlier this week Mr Phillips said that economic migrants could be forced to make a bigger contribution to the cost of public services. Mr Phillips said that some migrants who stay in the UK only for a short time should pay more for the use of schools and hospitals.
Posted by:anonymous5089

#13  Not sharing the same reality as everyone else is, of course, a symptom of mental illness.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2007-09-26 18:51  

#12  "Mr Phillips, who was educated at QueenÂ’s College Boys School in Guyana..."

I'm not sayin'...just sayin.
Posted by: DepotGuy   2007-09-26 18:19  

#11  Mention the turks helping a bit in 1588 as long as you make it clear what happened during the Sepoy mutiny, or the Mad Mahdi events, and Muslim slave traders up through the modern era. Make it clear that the Turks fought for the other side in WW1, and simply display crime and economic statistics for the UK from the end of WW2 onward when the immigration floodgates were opened. Don't cherry-pick your history, show it all.

I think the muslims will be crying to censor history soon enough.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2007-09-26 18:18  

#10  This is the kind of perverse rewriting of history that the Marxist historians have achieved in India.

Great care is taken to portray Muslim rule as a time of enlightenment. These deliberate lies are peddled by "emminent" historians like Romila Thapar who view history through the Marxist lens. Ironically that gets them invited by the Library of Congress to work on projects in the US.

The Nobel Laureate VS Naipaul says that at least Pakistani textbooks are honest with regard to this. They actually quote the original accounts where Islamic invaders boasted of how many temples, libraries and cities they razed to the ground, of how many hundred thousand people they put to death and enslaved.
Posted by: john frum   2007-09-26 18:12  

#9  His story will be kinde to me, 'cuase Ima gonna write a shite loade of it

Teh guy in teh pickture.
Posted by: HalfEmpty   2007-09-26 17:35  

#8  Forget it, BP. These folks revel in their "Smorgasboard of Realities". It's the rest of us that only have one.
Posted by: Mullah Richard   2007-09-26 16:41  

#7  How about a bit of Accuracy?
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2007-09-26 16:32  

#6  The Battle of Lepanto (1571) took place a couple of years (seventeen by my count) before the English/Spanish confrontation and, if I remember correctly, the last Spanish/Turkish confrontation took place about 1580-81 off Morocco.

That was some 'delay'. Must have been pretty special (or ethereal) too as I don't believe a Turkish Sultan (who fancied themselves as the Caliph) would be even interested in taking requests from an infidel (of whatever stripe), much less a woman.
Posted by: Mullah Richard   2007-09-26 16:29  

#5  
Posted by: Zenster   2007-09-26 15:35  

#4  "And what happened then Grandfather?"

"Well my boy, England broke away from the shackles of Romanism and the Pope, and formed the Anglican Church of Islam, which through the blessings of Mohammed, peace and honor be on him, became the official Mosque of England."
Posted by: Hank   2007-09-26 15:21  

#3  How about you rewrite your own history to reflect your culture's pathetic ability to keep up with the modern, western world?

No?

Then fuck off.
Posted by: DarthVader   2007-09-26 14:48  

#2  I hear Churchill was really a Muslim.
Well, even though he wasn't, he's dead, so let's make him one...
Posted by: tu3031   2007-09-26 14:46  

#1  I thought at the time of the Armada the Turkish fleet was still recovering from the damage done to it at Lepanto.
Posted by: Abdominal Snowman   2007-09-26 14:45  

00:00