| Submit your comments on this article |
| Syria-Lebanon-Iran |
| ABC: High Level Debate Stalled Syria Air Strike |
| 2007-10-06 |
| The September Israeli airstrike on a suspected nuclear site in Syria had been in the works for months, ABC News has learned, and was delayed only at the strong urging of the United States. In early July the Israelis presented the United States with satellite imagery that they said showed a nuclear facility in Syria. They had additional evidence that they said showed that some of the technology was supplied by North Korea. One U.S. official told ABC's Martha Raddatz the material was "jaw dropping" because it raised questions as to why U.S. intelligence had not previously picked up on the facility. Officials said that the facility had likely been there for months if not years. "Israel tends to be very thorough about its intelligence coverage, particularly when it takes a major military step, so they would not have acted without data from several sources," said ABC military consultant Tony Cordesman. U.S. Cautious After Flawed Iraq Intelligence A senior U.S. official said the Israelis planned to strike during the week of July 14 and in secret high-level meetings American officials argued over how to respond to the intelligence. Some in the administration supported the Israeli action, but others, notably Sect. of State Condoleeza Rice did not. One senior official said the U.S. convinced the Israelis to "confront Syria before attacking." Officials said they were concerned about the impact an attack on Syria would have on the region. And given the profound consequences of the flawed intelligence in Iraq, the U.S. wanted to be absolutely certain the intelligence was accurate. Initially, administration officials convinced the Israelis to call off the July strike. But in September the Israelis feared that news of the site was about to leak and went ahead with the strike despite U.S. concerns. The airstrike was so highly classified, President Bush refused to acknowledge it publicly even after the bombs fell. ABC's Martha Raddatz filed this report for "World News With Charles Gibson." Found via Glenn Reynolds/Instapundit, who also linked to this bit from Meryl Yourish. All I can say myself is, I wish we had had a CIA that was more interested in protecting the country than it was in playing "gotcha" by pretending Iraqi WMD being moved to Syria means it didn't really exist in the first lace. |
| Posted by:Abdominal Snowman |
| #2 Wow, three copies of the same article. Re contents, I've a suggestion to make. I wouldn't take MSM accusation against Bush administration (and as all the regulars know, I'm hardly a fun of theirs) without collaboration. |
| Posted by: gromgoru 2007-10-06 14:38 |
| #1 Re: the comments on the other two posts of this story... it seems the CIA has been busy training the administration to never do anything about WMD because whatever the CIA tells them about them existing isn't to be believed, and they'll be held accountable for "phony cooked intelligence for another misbegotten war..." |
| Posted by: Abdominal Snowman 2007-10-06 12:06 |