You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Israel attacked unfinished Syrian nuclear reactor
2007-10-14
More on the Sept. 6th raid.
The air raid on Syria conducted by Israel last month reportedly targeted a site that Israeli and US intelligence specialists believe was a partly constructed nuclear reactor that may have been modeled after one in North Korea.

Citing the usual unnamed US and foreign officials with access to the intelligence reports, The New York Times said it appeared Israel carried out the September 6 raid to demonstrate its determination to snuff out even a nascent nuclear project in a neighboring state.
You'd think the usual unnamed officials with access to serious intel could keep their mouths shut.
The facility that the Israelis struck in Syria appears to have been much further from completion than the Osirak nuclear reactor that Israel destroyed in Iraq in 1981, the paper said. Officials said it would have been years before the Syrians could have used the reactor to produce the spent nuclear fuel that could, through a series of additional steps, be reprocessed into bomb-grade plutonium, according to The Times.
Not a bad idea to neuter the Syrian nuke program early. The Israelis waited to near the last minute on the Osirak raid, and if they had failed it would have cost them dearly.
In Washington and Israel, the raid has been shrouded in secrecy and information restricted to few officials while the Israeli press has been prohibited from publishing information about the attack, the report said.

The administration of President George W. Bush was divided about the strike, and some senior policymakers still regard it as premature, the report said. The officials did not say that the Bush administration had ultimately opposed the Israeli strike, but that Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Defense Secretary Robert Gates were particularly concerned about the ramifications of a pre-emptive strike in the absence of an urgent threat, the paper said.
Posted by:Steve White

#5  Radical islam and aligned intend the WOT to be a battle/campaign to the death of Islam or Israel, etal - by this scope, unless democratic regime change takes place in so-called "rogue" nations, in the LT ISRAEL RISKS BEING INEVITABLY SURROUNDED BY Nuke/WMD-equipped hostile states. AS A MUSLIM POSTER SAID > PROLIFERATION + NO DEMOCRATIC/FAVORABLE REGIME CHANGE > IN LT, ISRAEL MAY WIN ALL THE BATTLES BUT WILL STILL LOSE THE WAR. IOW, Israel must conquer, or be conquered.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2007-10-14 22:20  

#4  In the NYT. Likely disinformation from some ax grinder.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2007-10-14 10:45  

#3  The administration of President George W. Bush was divided about the strike

Right down to Condi's forked tongue.
Posted by: Zenster   2007-10-14 10:07  

#2  So it seems like the cement wasn't just useless cover for the nuclear stuff that NorK was shipping them. Very efficient.
Posted by: gorb   2007-10-14 03:07  

#1   I suspect this delayed disclosure of the nature of the Syrian target was part of the whole operation, as a message to the Mad Mullahs.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2007-10-14 01:46  

00:00