| Submit your comments on this article | |
| Home Front: WoT | |
| Gates of Vienna | |
| 2007-10-21 | |
| |
| Posted by:Seafarious |
| #7 The french (Napoleon) was out for his own conquests and was not part of this coalition. Same shit different day! |
| Posted by: Cyber Sarge 2007-10-21 15:43 |
| #6 Yup, they did. |
| Posted by: Nimble Spemble 2007-10-21 14:31 |
| #5 Dunno, #4 NA, but I know Charles Martel stopped the moslem invaders in (what is now) France around 800 AD. Of course, that was a looooooong time ago. Things might have changed.... |
| Posted by: Barbara Skolaut 2007-10-21 14:24 |
| #4 Whose side were the French on in that one? |
| Posted by: Nimble Spemble 2007-10-21 12:49 |
| #3 Agreed, CS! I know this here "Christian Coalition" member (of the VRWC) would go see it! |
| Posted by: BA 2007-10-21 12:26 |
| #2 RE: The siege of Vienna in 1683 I strumbled onto this blog a few weeks ago and love it. I also began to think what a GREAT movie that would make. That is if there is a modern market about a "Christian Coalition" stopping the violent expansion of Islam. |
| Posted by: Cyber Sarge 2007-10-21 09:27 |
| #1 Excellent! Glad to see someone finally made the connection. Then today, I read Jonah Goldberg’s essay on the issue. He brought it all back, as fresh as the day I put the final period to my conclusions: In death-penalty cases, “reasonable doubt” goes to the accused because unless we’re certain, we must not risk an innocent’s life. This logic goes out the window when it comes to abortion, unless you are 100-percent sure that babies only become human beings after the umbilical cord is cut. I don’t see how you can be that sure, which is why I’m pro-life - not because I’m certain, but because I’m not. [emphasis mine - D ] |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2007-10-21 08:59 |