| Submit your comments on this article | ||
| Europe | ||
| Sarko, Goracle unveil green master plan for France | ||
| 2007-10-26 | ||
| President Nicolas Sarkozy, with Nobel-winning climate crusader Al Gore at his side, was to launch a raft of measures Thursday aimed at sparking a green revolution in France. Chief among the platform of measures, Sarkozy was to announce whether France would introduce a "carbon tax" on fuel and other polluting products, in a speech wrapping up four months of tough negotiations between the government, industry and the green lobby. Former US vice president Gore, guest of honour at the Elysee Palace, is to start the proceedings with a speech on climate change, flanked by his fellow Nobel winner the Kenyan Wangari Maathai, and European Commission head Jose Manuel Barroso. Working groups have been holding two days of final round-table talks to agree on a plan to slash France's greenhouse-gas emissions, cut pollution and foster biodiversity, to be endorsed by Sarkozy.
Other plans include a nationwide push to improve the energy-efficiency of new and existing buildings, with a target of 20 percent energy savings by 2010. Tougher, unpopular measures to cut transport emissions, from a speed cap on highways to a fuel tax on domestic flights, did not make it onto the list. But the "carbon tax" &0151; a bold but contested measure, renamed "energy climate contribution" and left for Sarkozy to decide &0151; is seen by campaigners as a test of the forum's success. Environmentalists said the tax, calculated from the greenhouse gases emitted to produce and market goods, would be "painless" for consumers and business, starting at a few cents per litre of fuel. Gradually increasing each year, its proceeds would be used, for instance, to fund the transfer of freight from road to rail.
On another explosive issue, genetically-modified (GMO) crops, participants settled on a temporary freeze on the sale of GMO seeds to review the scientific evidence on contamination risks pending a new law in January &0151; a solution judged "insufficient" by the anti-GM camp. The round-table on agriculture agreed to halve the frequency of pesticide treatments but set no deadline under pressure from the farm lobby &0151; to the anger of green campaigners. The government also said it was prepared to ban 47 highly toxic pesticides. Organic food received a big boost, with plans to lift share of organic crops in Europe's biggest agricultural producer from two to 20 percent by 2020, and make 20 percent of school meals organic. France's reliance on nuclear power, which accounts for more than 80 percent of electricity production, was not up for discussion, since the government refuses to review its nuclear energy strategy. Sarkozy vowed following his election in May to put sustainability at the heart of his government and expectations were high from the summit. Greenpeace estimates that France, Europe's third-biggest economy, needs to slash greenhouse gas emissions by 30 percent by the year 2030. The Alliance for the Planet, bringing together 80 environmental groups, has said it is globally satisfied with results so far, but warns France, a laggard on many green issues, has to catch up with its neighbours before it can provide global leadership in the field. | ||
| Posted by:Seafarious |
| #4 France is small enough that High Speed Rail makes sense. Quicker point to point than air when you figure in all of the BS at the airports at either end. With the containerization of freight traffic I wonder just how much is aready moving on rail in France. The RRs in the US have been taking business from the trucking companies as far as long didtance container traffic is concerned for years. But the Carbon Tax will most likely not go for the infrastructure needed to expand rail networks but for social entitlements IMO |
| Posted by: Chedderhead 2007-10-26 17:08 |
| #3 Create a tax, build up a fund, and have no real plan for what to do with the money. They've already got a pretty damn good one with that VAT at 19%. |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2007-10-26 14:12 |
| #2 This is a typical Euro solution to a problem. Create a tax, build up a fund, and have no real plan for what to do with the money. We are talking billions of Euros here. It would be better to hone in on some issues that some real good could be done, like real alternative sources of energy, or higher efficiencies, and get some entrepeneurs going on it for some millions instead of billions. Sarkozy is jumping on the Al Gore Kool-Aid bandwagon. The issues are driven by feelings and buzzwords, and not on rational thinking. |
| Posted by: Alaska Paul 2007-10-26 14:05 |
| #1 Heh..heh...heh. Looks like he saw you comin, Nicky. Did he put his arm around ya and look into your eyes? he learned that move from Clinton. Come back and see us in a few years. Let us know how it works out... Environmentalists said the tax, calculated from the greenhouse gases emitted to produce and market goods, would be "painless" for consumers and business, starting at a few cents per litre of fuel. Gradually increasing each year, its proceeds would be used, for instance, ummmmmmmmmmm....to fund the transfer of freight from road to rail. Yeah! That's a good one! And you can trust them "environmentalists" because they're not like the others... |
| Posted by: tu3031 2007-10-26 10:54 |