You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Pelosi Holds War Funds Hostage
2007-11-08
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Thursday she would bring a new Iraq measure to the House floor shortly to provide $50 billion in funds for the war, while requiring U.S. troops to begin redeploying out of Iraq immediately and conclude by the end of next year.

“In last year's election, the American people called for a new direction; nowhere was that direction more called for than in the war in Iraq,” Pelosi told reporters. “And so in the next day or so, we once again bring to the floor legislation that makes a distinction, a clear distinction: choose a new direction from the Bush foreign policy in Iraq.”

The California Democrat said the bill would leave a small force in the country to pursue Al Qaeda, protect U.S. interests and train Iraqi security forces. The bill would also require that U.S. interrogators abide by guidelines set forth in the Army field manual and that troops spend more time at home between deployments.

This measure, as with everything House Democrats have proposed to end the war in Iraq, would face significant hurdles in the Senate and would likely face a veto from the president.

The House could vote on the new measure as soon as Friday.
Posted by:Frank G

#12  SCUM.

Pelosi is a primary reason that in 2008 I will probably vote republican for the first time in my entire life. Hillary—or any other democrat for that matter—must be stopped.

I know many of you here at Rantburg are opposed to abortion. I remain pro-choice only because there is not yet realistic gender equality in our society. Once women enjoy true socioeconomic parity with men, then all bets are off and there had damn well better be some paternal influence over whatever right to abort or bear a child. Ultimately, the invention of an artificial womb will obviate the need for abortion so that if a father opposes abortion, the foetus can be brought to term ex-vitro. This would go a long way towards eliminating a lot of the inequity involved.

That said, I hope like Hell Giuliani gets the republican nomination. His pro-choice stance will enable me to vote for him with a clean conscience.

Please remember, I regard abortion as the absolute single worst form of contraception imaginable and non-medically justified late-term abortion as nothing but murder. Yet, I am still obliged to support the attainment of socioeconomic parity for women before I can countenance any illegalization of abortion. Women must have sufficient control over their bodies and lives to overcome this imbalanced social construct.
Posted by: Zenster   2007-11-08 22:40  

#11  And, yeah, that's my pet peeve.

Ya gonna lecture the whole country, Madame, ya ought to take messages from all of us.

Egotistical airhead.
Posted by: Bobby   2007-11-08 22:26  

#10  You could e-mail the Speaker, but like a first-term Congressman from Iowa, she only accepts e-mails from 'constituents'. So you'll have to send her a fax. A letter takes three or four weeks.
Posted by: Bobby   2007-11-08 22:24  

#9  Its her last chance to give aid and assistance to her allies before the general public realizes that we are actually *winning*.....

(P.S. Her allies are not on our side....)
Posted by: CrazyFool   2007-11-08 22:17  

#8  "pursue Al Qaeda, protect U.S. interests and train Iraqi security forces"

PArdon my language but jsut what the fuck does she thik we are doing now? And how the hell does she excpect us to do that with LESS troops and money?

Goddamned idiots!
Posted by: OldSpook   2007-11-08 20:47  

#7  Mental illness and Democrat Leadership© is defined by doing the same unsuccessful task the same way over and over again
Posted by: Frank G   2007-11-08 19:54  

#6  Someone should explain to her she's the speaker of the house, not the frigging President. She should also be forced to read the Constitution, especially the enumerated powers of each position. Then someone should kick her where her brains are - in the seat of her pants.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2007-11-08 19:02  

#5  Trapped by her own witlessness and her treasoness supporters.
Posted by: Phinater Thraviger   2007-11-08 17:58  

#4  C'mon and smell the $9 latte, Madam Speaker. If you want a new direction now, that can only be in a very bad direction for all involved.

If you had any political wits, you'd be taking credit for the surge AS the New Direction.
Posted by: eLarson   2007-11-08 17:39  

#3  I can't decide who's slower to learn; Nancy or this here dog:
Posted by: gorb   2007-11-08 17:38  

#2  Some one should explain to her that the Articles of Confederation were superceded and there was a reason.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2007-11-08 16:15  

#1  Setting yourself and the boys up for another big Democratic win, Mrs. Speakah?
The friggin dirty hippies are gonna be back on your lawn again pissin off the neighbors...
Posted by: tu3031   2007-11-08 16:06  

00:00