| Submit your comments on this article |
| India-Pakistan |
| Pakistan warns against nuclear weapons grab |
| 2007-11-12 |
| Pakistan warned Monday it had sufficient 'retaliatory capacity' to defend its nuclear weapons, after a report the United States had made contingency plans to stop them falling into the wrong hands. Denouncing 'irresponsible conjecture,' the foreign ministry said Pakistan was ready and able to defend its nuclear arsenal and there was no risk of the arms being taken. Its reaction followed a Washington Post report that with Pakistan in the throes of a political crisis, the US has drawn up contingency plans in case the Pakistani military risked losing control of the weapons. 'If there is any threat to our nuclear assets and sovereignty, we have the capacity to defend ourselves,' foreign ministry spokesman Mohammad Sadiq told Agence France-Presse. A ministry statement went further, saying in response to the daily's report that 'suffice it to say that Pakistan possesses adequate retaliatory capacity to defend its strategic assets and sovereignty.' The ministry strongly denied its weapons were at any risk. 'Our strategic assets are as safe as that of any other nuclear weapons state,' it said. A number of US officials and lawmakers have voiced concern that President Pervez Musharraf's government could lose control over its nuclear arsenal amid the crisis triggered by his imposition of a state of emergency. The Post cited several former US officials saying that the plans envision efforts to remove a nuclear weapon at imminent risk of falling into the hands of terrorists. However, it reported that US officials were worried their limited knowledge about the location of the arsenal could pose a problem. That was laughed off by the Pakistani foreign ministry. 'If they cannot locate Pakistan's nuclear weapons despite their satellites, how can people sitting on a mountain know where they are,' it said. Pakistan, a crucial Washington ally in the fight against Al-Qaeda and the Taliban, has amassed some 50 nuclear weapons since detonating its first atomic devices in May 1998. |
| Posted by:john frum |
| #6 "...there was no risk of the arms being taken." Taken - no. Given - ummmmmmmm mebbe. |
| Posted by: AlanC 2007-11-12 15:21 |
| #5 'If they cannot locate Pakistan's nuclear weapons despite their satellites, how can people sitting on a mountain know where they are,' it said. That's kinda the pink center of the roast ain't it? |
| Posted by: Thomas Woof 2007-11-12 15:16 |
| #4 'If they cannot locate Pakistan's nuclear weapons despite their satellites, how can people sitting on a mountain know where they are,' it said. Because there are people in your government who would tell them? |
| Posted by: Rob Crawford 2007-11-12 15:16 |
| #3 So "preempt in place" is the only strategy to pursue... |
| Posted by: M. Murcek 2007-11-12 14:53 |
| #2 The first Pakistan nuclear test was actually in 1984 at the Chinese Lop Nor test site. This was preceeded by both cold tests and simulations by the Chinese. It now appears that India didn't even have a deliverable weapon until 1988. The device tested in 1974 was not a weapon. It was only in 1984 that Rajiv Gandhi ordered weaponisation. Only then did was an air deliverable weapon produced and the IAF begin to perform bomb toss runs. If the Paks knew that the Indian weapon was existential, while Pakistan had a small arsenal of usable weapons.... |
| Posted by: john frum 2007-11-12 14:46 |
| #1 The ministry strongly denied its weapons were at any risk. 'Our strategic assets are as safe as that of any other nuclear weapons state,' it said. Phew! I was worried there for a minute. |
| Posted by: tu3031 2007-11-12 14:42 |