You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa Subsaharan
Mugabe Regime to Grab 25 Percent Stake in Mining Firms
2007-11-21
The government on Monday published a draft bill that will give them the power to grab a 25 percent shareholding in mining firms, without paying a cent. This new bill is an addition to the general Indigenisation and Empowerment Bill passed in September this year, which provided for a 51 percent stake in foreign owned firms for locals.

Companies who will bear the brunt of the takeovers include the world's second biggest platinum producer, Impala Platinum (Implats). Anglo Platinum, the world's largest primary producer of platinum is currently developing a mine project near Gweru on the Great Dyke and will also be affected, as will diamond producer Rio Tinto. South Africa's Implats, who are the leading foreign owned firm, insist their structure already conforms to the requirements of the new bill. Their Chief Executive Officer David Brown told Reuter's news agency that they have not yet seen the, 'latest documentation,' and cannot comment until they have seen it.
And then they'll be too busy setting charges in the mines to have any comment ...
Analysts say the Mugabe regime is failing to address the real political and economic issues that are affecting the country and is engaging in publicity stunts aimed at trying to win sympathy from ordinary people in Zimbabwe and the third world in general. They argue the new policy will only scare away foreign investors, the majority of whom are already reluctant to invest in the country. Other countries with investor friendly climates are likely to benefit at Zimbabwe's expense.

Businessman Mutumwa Mawere who lost his Shabani Mashaba Mines (SMM) to a government company-grab, said the new bill was strange given that, '100 percent of all mineral exports are controlled by the same state so why take a shareholding when in fact you control access to earnings of all minerals?' Zimbabwe is reported to have 22 mining companies with 10 of them in the hands of foreigners.

According to the Reserve Bank, 42 percent of the country's foreign currency earnings come from the mining sector where diamonds, platinum, chrome, palladium and gold are produced. Any disruption of this sector will have catastrophic effects for the country, as happened with the violent farm invasions that disrupted and destroyed the entire agriculture sector.
Worked so well the last time let's just do it again ...
Posted by:Fred

#10  Ima just hoping Bob and Grace don't die of natural causes before they get the Ceausescu or Mussolini treatment
Posted by: Frank G   2007-11-21 21:01  

#9  They aren't taking 25%- they want 51%, an absolute majority shareholding. 25% will be simply confiscated and 26% 'paid for' however Bob chooses. This in an economy where a can of baked beans now costs $1.2 million.
Bob is already using his control of foreign currency and the inflation to strangle the miners. This move is the same deal the farmers got. It's ours now. Piss off.
There is a lot of ruin in a country, as someone said. And there is still a lot of ruin left for Zimbabwe.
Posted by: Grunter   2007-11-21 12:37  

#8  This will get him killed
Posted by: RWV   2007-11-21 11:22  

#7  It worked for agriculture.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2007-11-21 09:46  

#6  This would be a good time to shut the mines down for "re-tooling", when they come back there probably wont be a Bob to negotiate with.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2007-11-21 09:37  

#5  Mugabe will grab the mining properties, which will follow the farming industry into disaster. Then look around and see who will pick up the pieces - you will find them in Beijing. I suspect China is actually CAUSING ZimBob to do stuff like this, though senile fool that he is, he doesn't realize it.
Posted by: Glenmore   2007-11-21 09:22  

#4  Maybe the Zim economy ain't so bad, if there is still 25% of something to steal.
Posted by: SteveS   2007-11-21 09:09  

#3  "Jim, what happened to the bank?"
"Why Huck honey, that bank went bust!"
Posted by: Thomas Woof   2007-11-21 08:30  

#2  Reminds me of a one-legged man hacking away at his sole remaining kneecap.
Posted by: Zenster   2007-11-21 06:20  

#1  Shameless. No economy to siphon taxes off of, so they had to go for the throat.
Posted by: gorb   2007-11-21 01:33  

00:00