| Submit your comments on this article |
| Olde Tyme Religion |
| UNICEF's photo of the year: This is wrong |
| 2007-12-18 |
| Posted by:anonymous5089 |
| #15 Eighteen or twenty to before forty, wxjames -- some girls probably as young as sixteen. It's not just because of the significant increase in the chance of Down's Syndrome that a woman should avoid pregnancy after that if possible. But before a girl's body is fully grown, it isn't physically big enough for the burden of a grown fetus. Bitches and cows that are bred too young suffer from the same problem. |
| Posted by: trailing wife 2007-12-18 20:45 |
| #14 As ascribed in IRAN-DAILY's article HAJ EMBODIES MUSLIM UNITY, Islam is once again indic or inferred as fighting its own internal "backwardness" = LT self-oblivion/obsolescence. FAITHFUL MUSLIMS MUST BE ASKED, AGAIN, HOW THEIR RELIGION/FAITH WILL REFORM ITSELF, WITH NO VIOLENCE OR AT A MINIMA OF VIOLENCE AGZ NON-MUSLIMS AND ESPEC WITHIN ITSELF??? |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2007-12-18 19:55 |
| #13 Whatsamatta, gramps? All your goats die? Of the clap? |
| Posted by: tu3031 2007-12-18 16:50 |
| #12 I'm no doctor, but I was told all this by a woman who breeds dogs and cows with excellent results. Better start ducking now cause the hairbrushes and spiked heels are flying your way. |
| Posted by: ed 2007-12-18 16:49 |
| #11 TW, while what you write is correct, it is not really advisable to give birth after thirty, when the body has hardened. 17 or even earlier would be about right for the body to bounce back. However, our civilization is complex and requires many years to learn enough to master the civilization. Else, we could start families at around 17 and stop birthing around 27. I'm no doctor, but I was told all this by a woman who breeds dogs and cows with excellent results. |
| Posted by: wxjames 2007-12-18 16:29 |
| #10 |
| Posted by: Anonymoose 2007-12-18 16:05 |
| #9 Nepal is either Hindu or Bhuddist, I can't recall. Child brides are common in India, too, at least in the lower classes. Same causes, mostly -- girls are a sunk cost to the family, and the men can't afford a wife until they've gotten much older. And, I believe, child brides are less expensive, because less well trained in the household arts, than those in their later teens. Sadly, giving birth so young is exceedingly damaging to the girl's body, and many are ruined for life -- not just the female organs, but the bladder and other organs as well, so that the girl may well need diapers the rest of her life. |
| Posted by: trailing wife 2007-12-18 15:55 |
| #8 Expect to see the libs express a new-found tolerance for pedophilia. |
| Posted by: KBK 2007-12-18 14:23 |
| #7 Surveys of five Afghan refugee camps on the Pakistan border of girls aged 8 to 13 indicate rates of marriage that exceed 50 percent, with the largest concentration of marriages occurring between 10 and 11 years. The Taliban and their ideological brothers are fighting for sex with children. They know women with the vote, women who can read, women who are able to leave the house and drive cars and work will destroy their rape cult(ure). |
| Posted by: Excalibur 2007-12-18 13:44 |
| #6 It's not clear from the article and accompanying text, but this child may be the first wife he could afford. In islam the graybeards get to lock up four wives apiece, leaving the young bucks to diddle little boys or go on jihad 'til they build up the extensive dowries and personal power necessary to get a wife. Young wives are the best 'cos they're pliable and more likely to survive giving birth multiple times. |
| Posted by: Seafarious 2007-12-18 12:09 |
| #5 and the protests from NOW, etc. were... |
| Posted by: mhw 2007-12-18 12:03 |
| #4 That girl looks absolutely terrified to me. Islam is intimately tied to Pedophilia. Its 'perfect man' was a pedophile, its holy book condones (even encourages) pedophilia and its the literal word of their [demented] god and therefore cannot be changed or re-interpreted. I'm sorry but a 9-year-old simply is not physically able to consumate a marriage. |
| Posted by: CrazyFool 2007-12-18 12:00 |
| #3 "Why does this man need a child, unless pedophilia is his thing?" Because all the 18 years olds are already married? When humans are regarded as property, there is a market in humans. We call it slavery and just abolished it in the U.S. about 142 years ago. Islam treats half the population as property and, anchored in the 7th century, Islam will not abandon such practices easily. |
| Posted by: Darrell 2007-12-18 11:52 |
| #2 Why does this man need a child, unless pedophilia is his thing? Why does his society condone it? His society condones this barbarism because his religion/political ideology condones it. |
| Posted by: Mark Z 2007-12-18 11:32 |
| #1 Islam is definitely the religion of pedophiles. |
| Posted by: DarthVader 2007-12-18 11:31 |