You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
Right Under Their Nose
2007-12-29
By B. Raman

Since 9/11, there has been hardly any jihadi terrorist strike anywhere in the world in which there was no Pakistani connection. Since 2002, there has been hardly any jihadi terrorist strike in Pakistani territory in which there was no connection of the General Headquarters (GHQ) of the Pakistan Army. By GHQ, one does not mean the entire army. One means some elements in the GHQ.

The first wake-up call about the possible presence of one or more sleeper cells of Al Qaeda in Rawalpindi came in March, 2003, when Khalid Sheikh Mohammad (KSM), who allegedly orchestrated the 9/11 terrorist strikes in the US, was found living in the house of a woman's wing office-bearer of the Jamaat-e-Islami in Rawalpindi. She had relatives in the army, including an officer of a Signal Regiment.

The second wake-up call came after the two attempts to assassinate President Pervez Musharraf in Rawalpindi in December,2003.The Pakistani authorities have not so far taken their public into confidence regarding the details of the two plots. All that they admitted was that four junior officers of the Army and six of the Air Force were allegedly involved. One of the army officers named Islamuddin was court-martialed and sentenced to death even before the investigation was complete. Another army officer named Havaldar Younis was sentenced to 10 years rigorous imprisonment. Much to the discomfiture of the authorities, one of the Air Force officers, a civilian, who was being held in custody in an Air Force station, managed to escape.
Posted by:john frum

#4  Do they have Reserves (Civilian Soldiers) Like we do?
That could account for it.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2007-12-29 23:11  

#3  Lazy editor or proofreading.

The facts though are not clear...

His lawyer says he is a civilian and should never have been tried in a military court. Pak officials said that he was a "uniformed junior rank officer".
Posted by: john frum   2007-12-29 16:45  

#2  You know, it seems that whenever I read an article about Pakistan it makes as much sense as this quote from the article:
"one of the Air Force officers, a civilian,"
Now is the problem me? the English as a second language skills of the author? or is that just the way Pakistan is? Inquiring minds want to know...

Posted by: Lionel Thatch1345   2007-12-29 15:01  

#1  Right Under Their Nose B. Raman


Thanks, John I always put extra weight to any topic B. Raman emphasizes, Ima a bit tired and fading noding out... so will come back on this in the morrow....
Posted by: RD   2007-12-29 02:58  

00:00